|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]高扬,王向章.基于SPA-Markov的飞行安全态势评估与预测研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):87-91.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.014]
　GAO Yang,WANG Xiangzhang.Research on assessment and prediction of flight safety situation based on SPA-Markov[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(8):87-91.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.014]
点击复制

基于SPA-Markov的飞行安全态势评估与预测研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年8期
页码:
87-91
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on assessment and prediction of flight safety situation based on SPA-Markov
作者:
高扬; 王向章
（中国民航大学 飞行技术学院，天津 300300）
Author(s):
GAO Yang;  WANG Xiangzhang
(The Flight Technology College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)
关键词:
飞行安全; 动态评估; 集对分析; 马尔科夫链
Keywords:
QAR;  flight safety;  dynamic assessment;  set pair analysis;  Markov chain
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为提高航空公司飞行安全风险控制和预测水平，利用QAR数据作为支撑，结合集 对分析和马尔科夫理论建立飞行安全态势评估模型。该模型以QAR超限事件为评估指标 ，采用集对分析中的联系度来描述安全风险等级；运用马尔科夫理论确定安全状态的转 移概率矩阵，以预测飞行安全动态变化趋势。最后以某公司A320机队6个月发生频率最 高的7类超限事件对模型进行验证。结果表明：该公司2月、6月和预测月份的安全状态 为一般风险，其他月份为低风险；总体安全状态也为一般风险，并有增加趋势。
Abstract:
In order to improve the risk control and prediction level of flight safety for airlines, taking the QAR data as support, an assessment model of flight safety situation was established by combining set pair analysis (SPA) with Markov theory. In this model, the QAR transfinite events were taken as the assessment indexes, then the connection degree in SPA was adopted to describe the safety risk level, and the Markov theory was applied to determine the transition probability matrix of safety state, so as to predict the dynamic variation trend of flight safety. Finally, the model was verified based on the data of 7 kinds of transfinite events which occurred most frequently in A320 fleet of a certain airline within 6 months. The results showed that the safety status of this airline in February, June and the predicted month are general risk, and those in the other months are low risk. The overall safety status is also general risk, with an increasing trend.

参考文献/References:

［1］陈可嘉，金炼. 航空公司飞行安全灰色区间层次评价［J］. 中国安全科学学报， 2015，25（8）：146-150. CHEN Kejia, JIN Lian. Grey interval hierarchy evaluation of airline flight safety performance ［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(8):146-150.
［2］李靖. 基于QAR数据的飞行人员训练分析系统［D］. 成都：电子科技大学，2010.
［3］郑波. 基于QAR数据的民航发动机排故方法研究［J］. 中国民航飞行学院学报， 2015，26（1）：47-49. ZHENG Bo. Research on the aero-engine troubleshooting method based on the QAR data ［J］. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China. 2015, 26(1):47-49.
［4］曹海鹏，舒平，黄圣国. 基于神经网络的民用飞机重着陆诊断技术研究［J］. 计 算机测量与控制，2008，16（7）：906-908. CAO Haipeng, SHU Ping, HUANG Shengguo. Study of aircraft hard landing diagnosis based on neural network ［J］. Computer Measurement ＆Control, 2008,16(7): 906-908.
［5］祁明亮，邵雪焱，池宏. QAR超限事件飞行操作风险诊断方法［J］. 北京航空航 天大学学报，2011，37（10）：1207-1210. QI Mingliang, SHAO Xueyan, CHI Hong. Flight operations risk diagnosis method on quick-access-record exceedance ［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, 37(10): 1207-1210.
［6］高小霞，霍纬纲，冯兴杰. 基于模糊关联分类器的民机超限事件诊断方法［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报，2014，40（10）：1366-1371. GAO Xiaoxia, HUO Weigang, FENG Xingjie. Civil aircraft’s exceedance event diagnosis method based on fuzzy associative classifier ［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014, 40(10):1366-1371.
［7］唐卫贞. 基于物元模型的航空公司飞行安全风险综合评价［J］. 安全与环境学报 ，2015，15（2）：25-29. TANG Weizhen. Comprehensive evaluation for the airline flight safety risk based on the matter-elements model ［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2015, 15(2):25-29.
［8］Peter Brooker. Experts, Bayesian belief networks, rare events and aviation risk estimates ［J］. Safety Science, 2011.
［9］James T. Luxhoj, David W. Coit. Modeling low probability high consequence events: an aviation safety risk model ［C］. Proceedings of the reliability and maintainability symposium, Newport Beach, 2006.
［10］刘洋. 贝叶斯网络在民航飞行安全评价中的应用［D］. 南京：南京航空航天大 学，2012.
［11］赵克勤. 集对分析及其初步应用［M］. 南京：浙江科学出版社，2000：15-17.
［12］许智慧. 马尔科夫状态转移概率矩阵的求解方法研究［D］. 哈尔滨：东北农业 大学，2013.
［13］靖培星，卢明银，高明. 基于SPA的人力资源外包风险动态评估［J］. 数学的实 践与认识，2013，43（1）：48-53. JING Peixing, LIU Mingyin, GAO Ming. Dynamic assessment of human resources outsourcing risk based on SPA ［J］. Mathematics in Practice and Theory. 2013, 43(1):48-53.
［14］施红，王强. 基于熵权的集对分析模型的在航空维修安全评价中的应用［J］. 实验室研究与探索，2014，33（10）：274-278. SHI Hong, WANG Qiang. Aviation maintenance safety evaluation application based on entropy and set-pair analysis model ［J］. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2014, 33(10):274-278.
［15］亢永，许开立，刘家喜. 城市埋地燃气管道危险性SPA- Markov链评价预测模型 ［J］. 中国安全科学学报，2012，22（3）：147-152. KANG Yong, XU Kaili, LIU Jiaxi. SPA-Markov chain model for evaluating and forecasting urban buried gas pipeline risk ［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(3):147-152.
［16］蒋云良. 基于同异反态势排序的学生成绩分析［J］. 数理统计与管理，2001， 20（1）：26-29. JIANG Yunliang. Analysis of students’ scores based on IDC state sort ［J］. Application of Statistics and Management, 2001, 20(1):26-19.
［17］杨延延. 基于QAR数据的飞行品质综合评估软件系统设计［D］. 成都：电子科技 大学，2010.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙瑞山,刘〓露.中美两国民航事故发展趋势对比分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):154.
　SUN Rui shan,LIU Lu.Comparative analysis on accident trend of civil aviation between China and America[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(8):154.
[2]甘旭升,端木京顺,丛伟,等.基于支持向量机的飞行安全隐患危险性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):206.
　GAN Xu-sheng,DUANMU Jing-shun,CONG Wei,et al.Fatalness assessment of flight safety hidden danger based on support vector machine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(8):206.
[3]王永刚,苏明清.基于因子分析与突变级数法的飞行安全状态评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]
　WANG Yonggang,SU Mingqing.Research on evaluation of flight safety situation based on factor analysis and catastrophe progression method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(8):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]
[4]桂志敬,吴忠广,严琼,等.公路隧道施工安全风险评估方法优化研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(9):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.09.022]
　GUI Zhijing,WU Zhongguang,YAN Qiong,et al.Study on optimization of safety risk assessment method for highway tunnel construction[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(8):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.09.022]
[5]王永刚,左笑颖.飞行安全技术影响因素及其作用机制研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(4):186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.029]
　WANG Yonggang,ZUO Xiaoying.Research on the factors affecting flight safety technology and its mechanism[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(8):186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.029]
[6]陈勇刚,崔康,孙向东,等.运输航空飞行安全绩效模糊动态评估模型*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(8):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.028]
　CHEN Yonggang,CUI Kang,SUN Xiangdong,et al.Fuzzy dynamic evaluation model on flight safety performance of transport aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(8):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.028]
[7]王永刚,左笑颖,韩文娟.飞行员飞行作风内在影响因素及对策研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(9):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.027]
　WANG Yonggang,ZUO Xiaoying,HAN Wenjuan.Study on intrinsic influencing factors and countermeasures for flying style of pilots[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(8):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.027]
[8]孙瑞山,李重锋.基于随机森林的飞机长着陆预警方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(5):182.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.05.028]
　SUN Ruishan,LI Chongfeng.Early-warning method of aircraft long landing based on random forest[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(8):182.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.05.028]
[9]孙瑞山,李重锋.基于k-SC聚类的飞行操作模式及危险性分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(9):150.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.09.024]
　SUN Ruishan,LI Chongfeng.Analysis of flight operation patterns and risk based on k-SC clustering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(8):150.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.09.024]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
民航局安全能力建设项目（FSSA2016054）；中央高校基本科研业务费项 目（Y16-27）
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-08-30