|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王永刚,苏明清.基于因子分析与突变级数法的飞行安全状态评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):187-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]
 WANG Yonggang,SU Mingqing.Research on evaluation of flight safety situation based on factor analysis and catastrophe progression method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(3):187-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]
点击复制

基于因子分析与突变级数法的飞行安全状态评价研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年3期
页码:
187-192
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2018-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on evaluation of flight safety situation based on factor analysis and catastrophe progression method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-03-0187-06
作者:
王永刚1苏明清2
(1.中国民航大学 安全学部,天津300300;2. 中国民航大学 经济与管理学院,天津 300300)
Author(s):
WANG Yonggang1 SU Mingqing2
(1. Safety Division, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China; 2. College of Economics and Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)
关键词:
QAR飞行安全因子分析突变级数法
Keywords:
quick access recorder flight safety factor analysis catastrophe progression method
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为合理评价航空公司的飞行安全状态,利用QAR超限事件作为原始数据,运用因子分析法确定评价指标及其重要程度。针对飞行运行的动态性,引入无需确定指标权重的突变级数法构建评价模型;利用某航空公司2015和2016年24个月的QAR数据,使用该模型进行评价,所得的评价结果与该公司的实际飞行安全状态基本相符合。结果表明:基于因子分析与突变级数法的飞行安全状态评价模型可用于实际评价工作中,且评价结果较为真实可靠。
Abstract:
In order to evaluate the flight safety situation of the airlines reasonably, the evaluation indexes and their importance degree were determined by using the factor analysis method through taking the quick access recorder(QAR) exceedance events as the original data. Aiming at the dynamics of the flight operation, an evaluation model was established by introducing into the catastrophe progression method without determining the weights of the indexes. The QAR data of a certain airline in 24 months from 2015 to 2016 were evaluated by the model, and the evaluation results were basically consistent with the actual flight safety situation of the airline. It showed that the evaluation model of flight safety situation based on the factor analysis and catastrophe progression method can be used in the actual evaluation work, and the evaluation results will be relatively true and reliable.

参考文献/References:

[1]LIOUA J J H, TZENGB G H, CHANGA H C. Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2007, 13(4):243-249.
[2]AHMADI A, SODERHOLM P. Assessment of Operational Consequences of Aircraft Failures:Using Event Tree Analysis[J]. 2008, 76(4):1-14.
[3]唐卫贞. 基于物元模型的航空公司飞行安全风险综合评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(2):25-29. TANG Weizhen. Comprehensive evaluation for the airline flight safety risk based on the matter-elements model [J]. Journal of Safety & Environment, 2015, 15(2):25-29.
[4]陈可嘉, 金炼. 航空公司飞行安全灰色区间层次评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(8):146-151. CHEN Kejia, JIN Lian. Grey interval hierarchy evaluation of airline flight safety performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(8):146-151.
[5]JAVENSIUS SEMBIRING, LUDWIG DREES, FLORIAN HOLZAPFEL. Extracting unmeasured parameters based on quick access recorder data using parameter-estimation method[C]//Aiaa Atmospheric Flight Mechanics,2013.
[6]WANG L, WU C, SUN R. An analysis of flight quick access recorder(QAR) data and its applications in preventing landing incidents[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014(127):86-96.
[7]高扬, 王向章. 基于SPA-Markov的飞行安全态势评估与预测研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(8):87-91. GAO Yang, WANG Xiangzhang. Research on assessment and prediction of flight safety situation based on SPA-Markov [J]. Journal of Safety Science & Technology, 2016, 12(8):87-91.
[8]周长春, 胡栋栋. 基于灰色聚类方法的航空公司飞机进近着陆阶段安全性评估[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(7):99-102. ZHOU Changchun, HU Dongdong. Safety assessment of aircraft during approach-landing stage based on grey clustering method [J]. Journal of Safety Science & Technology, 2012, 8(7):99-102.
[9]甘旭升, 端木京顺, 高建国. 基于相关向量机的飞行安全评价方法[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(12):143-148. GAN Xusheng, DUANMU Jingshun, GAO Jianguo. Flight safety evaluation method based on relevance vector machine [J]. Journal of Safety Science & Technology, 2012, 8(12):143-148.
[10]刘得一,张兆宁,杨新涅. 民航概论[M]. 北京:中国民航出版社, 2011.
[11]WANG W, LIU S, ZHANG S, et al. Assessment of a model of pollution disaster in near-shore coastal waters based on catastrophe theory[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222(2):307-312.
[12]金佩剑, 王恩元, 刘晓斐,等. 冲击地压危险性综合评价的突变级数法研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(2):256-261. JIN Peijian, WANG Enyuan, LIU Xiaofei, et al. Catastrophe progression method on comprehensive evaluation of rock burst [J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2013, 30(2):256-261.
[13]郭云涛, 贾永, 白思俊. 基于突变级数法的科技园区项目选择决策研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(5):164-169. GUO Yuntao, JIA Yong, BAI Sijun. Project selection of science and technology park based on catastrophe progression method [J].Science and Technology Management Research, 2017, 37(5):164-169.
[14]THOM R, FOWLER D H. Structural stability and morphogenesis:An outline of a general theory of models.[M]. London:Benjamin, 1975.
[15]周绍江. 突变理论在环境影响评价中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2003, 34(2):52-54. ZHOU Shaojiang. Application of catastrophe theory in environmental impact assessment[J]. Yangtze River, 2003, 34(2):52-54.
[16]骆方, 刘红云, 黄崑. SPSS数据统计与分析[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2011.
[17]赵鹏, 倪文, 韩峰. 如何预防飞行过程中的不安全因素[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(4):57-61. ZHAO Peng, NI Wen, HAN Feng. How to prevent unsafe factors during flight [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2006, 16(4):57-61.
[18]施玉群, 刘亚莲, 何金平. 关于突变评价法几个问题的进一步研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2003, 36(4):132-136. SHI Yuqun, LIU Yalian, HE Jinping. Further study on some questions of catastrophe evaluation method [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Hydraulic & Electric Engineering, 2003, 36(4):132-136.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙瑞山,韩文律.基于差异检验的飞行超限事件参数特征分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):22.
 SUN Rui shan,HAN Wen lv.Analysis on paremeters characteristics of flight exceedance events based on distinction test[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):22.
[2]周长春,胡栋栋.基于灰色聚类方法的航空公司飞机进近 着陆阶段安全性评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(7):99.
 ZHOU Chang chun,HU Dong dong.Safety assessment of aircraft during approachlanding stage based on grey clustering method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(3):99.
[3]孙瑞山,刘〓露.中美两国民航事故发展趋势对比分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):154.
 SUN Rui shan,LIU Lu.Comparative analysis on accident trend of civil aviation between China and America[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(3):154.
[4]甘旭升,端木京顺,丛伟,等.基于支持向量机的飞行安全隐患危险性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):206.
 GAN Xu-sheng,DUANMU Jing-shun,CONG Wei,et al.Fatalness assessment of flight safety hidden danger based on support vector machine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(3):206.
[5]高扬,王向章.基于SPA-Markov的飞行安全态势评估与预测研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):87.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.014]
 GAO Yang,WANG Xiangzhang.Research on assessment and prediction of flight safety situation based on SPA-Markov[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(3):87.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.014]
[6]王永刚,左笑颖.飞行安全技术影响因素及其作用机制研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(4):186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.029]
 WANG Yonggang,ZUO Xiaoying.Research on the factors affecting flight safety technology and its mechanism[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(3):186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.029]
[7]王永刚,左笑颖,韩文娟.飞行员飞行作风内在影响因素及对策研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(9):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.027]
 WANG Yonggang,ZUO Xiaoying,HAN Wenjuan.Study on intrinsic influencing factors and countermeasures for flying style of pilots[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(3):173.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.027]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
2015年民航科技项目(MHRD003)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-11