|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王永刚,左笑颖.飞行安全技术影响因素及其作用机制研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(4):186-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.029]
 WANG Yonggang,ZUO Xiaoying.Research on the factors affecting flight safety technology and its mechanism[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(4):186-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.029]
点击复制

飞行安全技术影响因素及其作用机制研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年4期
页码:
186-192
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the factors affecting flight safety technology and its mechanism
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-03-0186-07
作者:
王永刚1左笑颖2
(1.中国民航大学 安全科学与工程学部,天津 300300;2.中国民航大学 经济与管理学院,天津 300300)
Author(s):
WANG Yonggang1 ZUO Xiaoying2
(1.Division of Safety Science & Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;2.School of Economics & Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)
关键词:
飞行安全飞行技术安全绩效技术评价影响因素
Keywords:
flight safetyflight technologysafety performancetechnical assessmentinfluencing factors
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为通过管控飞行安全技术的影响因素提高飞行员飞行技术水平,从信息感知、信息处理、判断决策和反应行动4个方面分析了影响飞行安全技术的因素,并对影响作用做出假设。采用问卷调查获取数据,并应用结构方程模型定量分析各因素对飞行安全技术的作用。研究结果表明:判断决策相关因素、信息处理相关因素、反应行动相关因素、信息感知相关因素对飞行安全技术的影响程度依次递减;平衡觉、运动觉、视觉、震动觉、听觉通过作用于飞行员的信息感知进而影响飞行安全技术且影响程度依次递减;飞行经验、注意、理论知识、记忆通过作用于飞行员的信息处理进而影响飞行安全技术且影响程度依次递减;空间定向、风险感知、逻辑推理、快速运算通过作用于飞行员的判断决策进而影响飞行安全技术且影响程度依次递减;动作协调性、动作准确性、动作及时性通过作用于飞行员的反应行动进而影响飞行安全技术且影响程度依次递减。
Abstract:
In order to improve the flight technology level of pilots by controlling influencing factors of flight safety technology, the factors were analyzed from four aspects: information perception, information processing, judgment and decisionmaking and reaction actions. Hypotheses were put forward about factors’ action mechanism. The data were obtained by questionnaires and the actions of various factors on the flight safety technology were quantitatively analyzed by structural equation models. The results show that the degree of influence of judgment decisionmaking factors, information processing factors, reaction actions factors and information perception factors on flight safety technology decrease in turn. Balance, sensation, vision, vibration, and hearing affect the flight safety technology through the perception of information acting on the pilot, and the degree of influence decreases in turn; flight experience, attention, theoretical knowledge, and memory affect the flight safety technology through the information processing applied to the pilot, and the degree of influence decreases in turn; spatial orientation, risk perception, logical reasoning, and fast calculation affect the flight safety technology through the decisionmaking decisions of the pilot and the degree of influence decreases in turn; the motion coordination, motion accuracy, and timeliness of action affect the flight safety technology through the reaction actions on the the pilot and the degree of influence decreases in turn.

参考文献/References:

[1]Barber M R, Jones C K, Sisk T R, et al. Anevaluation of the handling qualities of seven general aviation aircraft[M]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1966.
[2]Hart S G. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research[J]. Advances in Psychology, 1988, 52(6):139-183.
[3]刘嘉, 向锦武, 司守奎. 舰载机飞行员驾驶技术与飞行安全研究[J].飞行力学, 2016(6):6-9,19. LIU Jia, XIANG Jinwu, SI Shoukui. Research on pilot driving technology and flight safety of carrier-borne aircraft[J].Flight Dynamics, 2016 (6):6-9,19.
[4]HAYGOOD D H. Audio-visual concept formation[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965, 56(3):126-132.
[5]SHANNON C E. Amathematical theory of communication[J]. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 2001, 5(1): 3-55.
[6]HAYGOOD. Visual and auditory information processing aspects of the acquisition of flying skill[J]. Aircraft Pilots, 1974:63.
[7]GORDON H. The cognitive lateral specialization of cognitive function[J]. International Journal Neuroscience, 1986(29): 223-236.
[8]宗玉国,游旭群,叶万钧,等.认知特征与飞行技术水平关系的初步研究[J].海军医学,1997(1):15-16. ZONG Yuguo, YOU Xuqun, YE Wanjun, et al. Preliminary study on the relationship between cognitive characteristics and flight skill levels[J]. Naval Medicine, 1997 (1): 15-16.
[9]黄圣. 判断与决策对于飞行安全的影响[J]. 科技创新导报, 2017(9):181-182. HUANG Sheng. Impact of judgment and decision-making on flight safety[J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2017(9):181-182.
[10]武国城. 以认知心理学观点评定飞行能力[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志, 1995,6(2):120-124. WU Guocheng. Assessment of flight ability from cognitive psychological point of view[J]. Chinese Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 1995,6(2): 120-124.
[11]HARTMAN B O, SECRIST G E. Situational awareness is more than exceptional vision[J]. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine, 1991, 62(11):1084-1089.
[12]HU Y , LI R, ZHANG Y. Predicting pilot behavior duringmidair encounters using recognition primed decision model[J]. Information Sciences, 2017:S0020025516314773.
[13]张晓燕,薛红军.驾驶舱中飞行员信息处理时间预测模型[J].系统仿真学报,2014,26(7):1607-1610,1626. ZHANG Xiaoyan, XUE Honghong. Preditive time modelling for pilot information processing in flightdeck [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2014,26(7):1607-1610,1626.
[14]杜红兵,刘明,靳慧斌.基于信息处理和事故链原理的结构化飞行员差错模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(6):25-31. DU Hongbing, LIU Ming, JIN Huibin. Study on a structured pilot error model based on information processing and accident chain principle [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(6): 25-31.
[15]刘宇婕.飞机驾驶操纵安全性评估方法研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2017.
[16]王永刚, 孙睿韬. 飞行员驾驶水平、管理能力和身心素质对安全绩效的影响关系研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016,12(12):149-153. WANG Yonggang, SUN Ruitao. The research on the relationship between pilot's flight Level, management ability and physical and mental quality on safety performance[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016 12(12):149-153.
[17]丁邦昕.飞机驾驶学[M].北京:蓝天出版社,2004.
[18]PAYNE K H, HARRIS D. A Psychometricapproach to the development of a multidimensional scale to assess aircraft handling qualities[J]. International Journal of Aviation Psychology,2000,10(4):343-362.
[19]陈芳,孙亚腾,范丹红,等.飞行安全技术评价指标体系实证研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(9):146-151. CHEN Fang, SUN Yateng, FAN Danhong, et al. Empirical study on the evaluation index system of flight safety skill[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27 (9): 146-151.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙瑞山,刘〓露.中美两国民航事故发展趋势对比分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):154.
 SUN Rui shan,LIU Lu.Comparative analysis on accident trend of civil aviation between China and America[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):154.
[2]甘旭升,端木京顺,丛伟,等.基于支持向量机的飞行安全隐患危险性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):206.
 GAN Xu-sheng,DUANMU Jing-shun,CONG Wei,et al.Fatalness assessment of flight safety hidden danger based on support vector machine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(4):206.
[3]高扬,王向章.基于SPA-Markov的飞行安全态势评估与预测研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):87.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.014]
 GAO Yang,WANG Xiangzhang.Research on assessment and prediction of flight safety situation based on SPA-Markov[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(4):87.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.014]
[4]王永刚,苏明清.基于因子分析与突变级数法的飞行安全状态评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]
 WANG Yonggang,SU Mingqing.Research on evaluation of flight safety situation based on factor analysis and catastrophe progression method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(4):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-02-16
基金项目: 2015年民航科技项目(20150202)
作者简介: 王永刚,博士,教授,主要研究方向为系统安全管理,人因工程与行为管理以及质量、安全管理体系等。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-09