|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈述,余迪,吴黎明.基于G1法的高危作业疲劳风险模糊综合评判[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):90-95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.016]
　CHEN Shu,YU Di,WU Li ming.Fatigue risk fuzzy evaluation for highrisk operations based on G1 method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(4):90-95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.016]
点击复制

基于G1法的高危作业疲劳风险模糊综合评判
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年4期
页码:
90-95
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2014-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Fatigue risk fuzzy evaluation for highrisk operations based on G1 method
作者:
陈述1; 2; 余迪1; 吴黎明1
(1.三峡大学 水利与环境学院，湖北宜昌443002； 2.三峡地区地质灾害与生态环境湖北省协同创新中心，湖北 宜昌443002)
Author(s):
CHEN Shu 1; 2;  YU Di 1;  WU Li ming 1
(1.College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China； 〖JP3〗 2. Collaborative Innovation Center for GeoHazards and Ecoenvironment in Three Gorges Area, Yichang Hubei 443002, China)
关键词:
安全管理工程; 风险评判; G1法; 作业疲劳; 模糊
Keywords:
safety management engineering;  risk evaluation;  G1 method;  operation fatigue;  fuzzy
分类号:
X932
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
疲劳严重威胁作业安全，许多事故都直接或间接由疲劳引发。针对高危作业疲劳风险评价问题，考虑作业疲劳致因，综合运用 G1法，提出高危作业疲劳风险的模糊综合评判方法。首先，根据疲劳的表现，系统分析影响高危作业疲劳的因素，以管理因素、岗位因素、作业环境、生理、心理等5个因素为准则，构建作业疲劳风险的评价指标体系。然后，应用G1法，确定指标权重,建立高危作业疲劳风险多级模糊综合评价模型，评判疲劳状况。最后,通过一个案例验证了模型方法的可行性与有效性，为综合评判高危作业疲劳发生可能性提供了一个新视角与方法。
Abstract:
Fatigue is the direct or indirect cause of many accidents and is a serious threat to work safety. For fatigue risk evaluation of highrisk operations, the causes of operations fatigue were considered and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was proposed according to comprehensive application of G1. First of all, a systematical analysis of the influencing factor was conducted based on the performance of fatigue, and an evaluation index system was constructed with criterion of management, job, environment, physiological and psychological factors. Then, the weights of indexes were determined by applying the method of G1 and the multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of highrisk operations fatigue risk was built to judge fatigue. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the method were illustrated by an example. It provides a new perspective and tool for the comprehensive evaluation on the likelihood of highrisk operations fatigue.

参考文献/References:


[1］陈述，胡志根，刘全 等. 水电工程施工安全管理激励机制设计［J］. 系统工程学报, 2012, 27(4): 474480 CHEN Shu, HU ZhiGen, LIU Quan, et al. Incentive mechanism design for safety management of hydropower construction［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2012, 27(4): 474480.
[2］Freudenberger Herbert J. Staff burnout［J］. Journal of Social Issues, 1974, 30(1): 159165.
[3］吴维库，余天亮，宋继文. 情绪智力对工作倦怠影响的实证研究［J］. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008, 23(S2): 122133, 144 WU Weiku, YU Tianliang, SONG Jiwen. An empirical study of the impacts of emotional interlligence on job burnout［J］. Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2008, 23(S2): 122133, 144.
[4］袁凌，魏佳琪，林菲. 企业中层管理者工作倦怠的成因及其干预措施［J］. 湖南大学学报：社会科学版, 2009, 23(1): 5255 YUAN Ling, WEI Jiaqi, LIN Fei. The causes and interventions of job burnout on middlelevel managers［J］. Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences), 2009, 23(1): 5255.
[5］江卫东，陈丽芬. 工作倦怠与工作压力源和工作满意度关系研究［J］. 南京理工大学学报：自然科学版, 2009, 33(4): 548554 JIANG Weidong, CHEN Lifen. Relationship between job burnout and job stressors and job satisfaction［J］. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology(Nature Science), 2009, 33(4): 548554.
[6］陈子彤，刘玉燕. 知识型员工工作压力与工作倦怠关系的实证研究［J］. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008, 29(12): 157161 CHEN Zitong, LIU Yuyan. Empirical study on relationship between job pressure and job burnout of knowledge worker［J］. Science of Science and Management oF S.&.T., 2008, 29(12): 157161.
[7］李乃文，牛莉霞，马跃. 高危岗位矿工工作倦怠影响因素的结构方程模型［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(6): 2733 LI Naiwen, NIU Lixia, MA Yue. SEM of factors affecting coal miners' job burnout［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(6): 2733.
[8］Cabon Philippe, Deharvengt Stephane, Grau Jean Yves et al. Research and guidelines for implementing Fatigue Risk Management Systems for the French regional airlines［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2012, 45(SUPPL.): 4144.
[9］类淑菊，孙佳，李彤, 等. 基于G1法的飞行疲劳风险模糊综合评判方法研究［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2013, 13(4): 244249 LEI Shuju, SUN Jia, LI Tong, et al. On fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on the flight fatigue risk based on G1 method［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2013, 13(4): 244249.
[10］王强，张晓明，杨涛, 等. 国内外油气管道人员疲劳风险管理标准对比分析［J］. 油气储运, 2013, 32(3): 270273 WANG Qiang, ZHANG Xiaoming, YANG Tao, et al. Contrastive analysis of fatigue risk management standards for oil and gas pipeline operators at home and abroad［J］. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2013, 32(3): 270273.
[11］张嬿，方卫宁，鄂明成, 等. 地铁列车司机轮班疲劳风险分析［J］. 铁道运输与经济, 2010, 32(4): 9094 ZHANG Yan, FANG Weining, E Mingcheng, et al. Analysis on fatigue risk of subway divers on shift［J］. Railway Transport and Economy, 2010, 32(4): 9094.
[12］高扬，靳珊珊，刘俊杰. 基于改进TOPSIS方法的飞行员疲劳风险评价研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(2): 4449 GAO Yang, JIN Shanshan, LIU Junjie. Study on pilot fatigue risk evaluation based on the improved TOPSIS method［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(2): 4449.
[13］郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及应用［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007 .〖FL)〗〖HJ〗〖HT〗〖ST〗〖WT〗

相似文献/References:

[1]王永刚,董保健.管制员人为差错影响因素及指标权重分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):28.
　WANG Yong gang,DONG Bao jian.Analysis of human error influence factors and evaluation indexes weights determination for air traffic controller[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):28.
[2]郑霞忠,望运龙,陈述,等.水电工程高危作业风险影响因素的SEM模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(8):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.021]
　ZHENG Xia-zhong,WANG Yun-long,CHEN Shu,et al.SEM model of hydropower high-risk operation on affecting factors[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(4):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.021]
[3]陈述,余迪,郑霞忠.水电工程施工作业安全管理能力集对分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):56.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.010]
　CHEN Shu,YU Di,ZHENG Xia-zhong.Set pair analysis on safety management ability in construction operation of hydropower project[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(4):56.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.010]
[4]张勇,王祥宇.基于DEMATEL-ISM-BN的施工人员不安全行为致因研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(11):110.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.017]
　ZHANG Yong,WANG Xiangyu.Study on causes of unsafe behaviors of construction workers based on DEMAREL-ISM-BN[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(4):110.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.017]
[5]林新奇,栾宇翔,赵国龙.领导风格与员工安全行为关系的元分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(10):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.001]
　LIN Xinqi,LUAN Yuxiang,ZHAO Guolong.Meta-analysis on relationship between leadership style and employee safety behavior[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(4):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.001]
[6]王保云,王婷.一种改进的疏散节点踩踏风险评估算法*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(4):218.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.031]
　WANG Baoyun,WANG Ting.An improved algorithm for stampede risk assessment of evacuation nodes[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(4):218.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.031]
[7]陈述,鲁世立,王建平,等.融合Unity3D的缆索起重机安全运行数字孪生模型构建方法*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(1):154.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.01.023]
　CHEN Shu,LU Shili,WANG Jianping,et al.Construction method of digital twin model for safe operation of cable crane by integrating Unity3D[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(4):154.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.01.023]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51379110),三峡大学科学基金(KJ2013B073)
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-04-28