|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]林新奇,栾宇翔,赵国龙.领导风格与员工安全行为关系的元分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(10):5-10.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.001]
　LIN Xinqi,LUAN Yuxiang,ZHAO Guolong.Meta-analysis on relationship between leadership style and employee safety behavior[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(10):5-10.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.001]
点击复制

领导风格与员工安全行为关系的元分析*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
17
期数:
2021年10期
页码:
5-10
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2021-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Meta-analysis on relationship between leadership style and employee safety behavior
文章编号:
1673-193X(2021)-10-0005-06
作者:
林新奇; 栾宇翔; 赵国龙
（中国人民大学 劳动人事学院，北京 100872）
Author(s):
LIN Xinqi;  LUAN Yuxiang;  ZHAO Guolong
(School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
关键词:
安全管理工程; 安全行为; 领导风格; 变革型领导; 元分析
Keywords:
safety management engineering;  safety behavior;  leadership style;  transformational leadership;  meta-analysis
分类号:
X921
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为更好地比较不同领导风格对员工安全行为的影响，采用元分析方法，基于34篇独立实证研究的15 032个样本，对常见的领导风格与员工安全行为关系进行定量分析。结果表明：对于安全遵守，相关系数从低到高分别为伦理型领导、变革型领导、领导-成员交换以及交易型领导；对于安全参与，相关系数从低到高分别为伦理型领导、变革型领导、交易型领导、领导-成员交换；年龄、经济发展水平、行业以及研究设计调节了领导风格与员工安全行为之间的关系。
Abstract:
In order to better compare the influence of different leadership styles on the safety behavior of employee,the meta-analysis method was used to quantitatively analyze the relationship between common leadership styles and employee safety behavior based on 15 032 samples from 34 independent empirical studies.The results showed that for the safety compliance,the correlation coefficients from low to high were the ethical leadership,transformational leadership,leader-member exchange,and transactional leadership.For the safety participation,the correlation coefficients from low to high were the ethical leadership,transformational leadership,transactional leadership,and leader-member exchange.The age,level of economic development,industry and research design moderated the relationship between leadership style and employee safety behavior.

参考文献/References:

［1］KRAUSE T,SEYMOUR K,SLOAT K.Long-term evaluation of a behavior-based method for improving safety performance:a meta-analysis of 73 interrupted time-series replications ［J］.Safety Science,1999,32(1):1-18.
［2］MENG X,CHAN A H S,LUI L K H,et al.Effects of individual and organizational factors on safety consciousness and safety citizenship behavior of construction workers:a comparative study between Hong Kong and Mainland China ［J］.Safety Science,2021,12(1):135-147.
［3］KALTEH H O,MORTAZAVI S B,MOHAMMADI E,et al.The relationship between safety culture and safety climate and safety performance:a systematic review ［J］.International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics,2021,27(1):206-216.
［4］THOLN S L,POUSETTE A,TRNER M.Causal relations between psychosocial conditions,safety climate and safety behaviour:a multi-level investigation ［J］.Safety Science,2013,55(1)：62-69.
［5］CHRISTIAN M S,BRADLEY J C,WALLACE J C,et al.Workplace safety:a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors ［J］.Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,94(5):1103-1126.
［6］FERNNDEZ-MUIZ B,MONTES-PEN J M,VZQUEZ-ORDS C J.Safety leadership,risk management and safety performance in Spanish firms ［J］.Safety Science,2014,70(1):295-307.
［7］SHEN Y,JU C,KOH T Y,et al.The impact of transformational leadership on safety climate and individual safety behavior on construction sites ［J］.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2017,14(1):45-57.
［8］SMITH T D,ELDRIDGE F,DEJOY D M.Safety-specific transformational and passive leadership influences on firefighter safety climate perceptions and safety behavior outcomes ［J］.Safety Science,2016,86(1):92-97.
［9］董保宝,曹琦,罗均梅.元分析方法在国内外创业研究中的应用述评［J］.管理学报,2020,17(6):937-948. DONG Baobao,CAO Qi,LUO Junmei.The overviews of meta-analysis application in entrepreneurship research in China and abroad［J］.Chinese Journal of Management,2020,17(6):937-948.
［10］HUNTER J E,SCHMIDT F L.Methods of meta-analysis:correcting error and bias in research findings ［M］.Thousand Oaks,California:Sage,2004.
［11］MOTOWIDLO S J,VAN SCOTTER J R.Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance ［J］.Journal of Applied Psychology,1994,79(4):475-480.
［12］GRIFFIN M A,NEAL A.Perceptions of safety at work:a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance,knowledge,and motivation ［J］.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,2000,5(3):347-358.
［13］CROPANZANO R,MITCHELL M S.Social exchange theory:an interdisciplinary review ［J］.Journal of Management,2005,31(6):874-900.
［14］BLAU P M.Exchange and power in social life ［J］.American Sociological Review,1965,30(5):789-790.
［15］BASS B M.Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership ［J］.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,1999,8(1):9-32.
［16］BROWN M E,TREVIO L K,HARRISON D A.Ethical leadership:a social learning perspective for construct development and testing ［J］.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2005,97(2):117-134.
［17］ROCKSTUHL T,DULEBOHN J H,ANG S,et al.Leader-member exchange (LMX) and culture:a meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries ［J］.Journal of Applied Psychology,2012,97(6):1097-1130.
［18］NAHRGANG J D,MORGESON F P,HOFMANN D A.Predicting safety performance:a meta-analysis of safety and organizational constructs ［C］// The 22nd Annual Conference of The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.New York:Poster Session,2007:1-21.
［19］MACKENZIE S B,PODSAKOFF P M.Common method bias in marketing:causes,mechanisms,and procedural remedies ［J］.Journal of Retailing,2012,88(4):542-555.
［20］HOCH J E,BOMMER W H,DULEBOHN J H,et al.Do ethical,authentic,and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? a meta-analysis ［J］.Journal of Management,2018,44(2):501-529.
［21］DUKE J,GUEST M,BOGGESS M.Age-related safety in professional heavy vehicle drivers:a literature review ［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention,2010,42(2):364-371.
［22］张建平,秦传燕,刘善仕.寻求反馈能改善绩效吗？——反馈寻求行为与个体绩效关系的元分析 ［J］.心理科学进展,2020,28(4):549-565. ZHANG Jianping,QIN Chuanyan,LIU Shanshi.Does seek feedback improve performance? a meta-analytic review about feedback-seeking behavior and individual performance ［J］.Advances in Psychological Science,2020,28(4):549-565.

相似文献/References:

[1]王永刚,董保健.管制员人为差错影响因素及指标权重分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):28.
　WANG Yong gang,DONG Bao jian.Analysis of human error influence factors and evaluation indexes weights determination for air traffic controller[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(10):28.
[2]吴建金,耿修林,傅贵.基于中介效应法的安全氛围对员工安全行为的影响研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(3):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.03.14]
　WU Jian jin,GENG Xiu lin,FU Gui.Study on the impact of safety atmosphere to employee safety behavior based on the intermediary effect method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(10):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.03.14]
[3]陈述,余迪,吴黎明.基于G1法的高危作业疲劳风险模糊综合评判[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.016]
　CHEN Shu,YU Di,WU Li ming.Fatigue risk fuzzy evaluation for highrisk operations based on G1 method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(10):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.016]
[4]郑霞忠,望运龙,陈述,等.水电工程高危作业风险影响因素的SEM模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(8):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.021]
　ZHENG Xia-zhong,WANG Yun-long,CHEN Shu,et al.SEM model of hydropower high-risk operation on affecting factors[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(10):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.021]
[5]陈述,余迪,郑霞忠.水电工程施工作业安全管理能力集对分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):56.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.010]
　CHEN Shu,YU Di,ZHENG Xia-zhong.Set pair analysis on safety management ability in construction operation of hydropower project[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(10):56.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.010]
[6]李书全,吴秀宇,袁小妹,等.基于GA-SVM的施工人员安全行为影响因素及决策模型研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):185.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.031]
　LI Shu-quan,WU Xiu-yu,YUAN Xiao-mei,et al.Study on influencing factors and decision model of safety behaviors for construction personnel based on GA-SVM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(10):185.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.031]
[7]欧阳秋梅,吴超.安全观的塑造机理及其方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(9):14.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.002]
　OUYANG Qiumei,WU Chao.Research on forming mechanism and methods of safety idea[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(10):14.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.002]
[8]蒋永清,刘铁超,孙大伟,等.木材加工企业安全氛围对员工安全行为的影响因素研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(2):181.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.033]
　JIANG Yongqing,LIU Tiechao,SUN Dawei,et al.Study on influence factors of safety climate to safety behavior of employee in wood processing enterprises[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(10):181.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.033]
[9]郑霞忠,石法起,陈述,等.基于D-S证据理论的地下洞室作业人员安全行为评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(6):158.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.028]
　ZHENG Xiazhong,SHI Faqi,CHEN Shu,et al.Evaluation on safety behavior of workers in underground cavern based on D-S evidence theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(10):158.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.028]
[10]王丹,宫晶晶.领导行为、安全文化与矿工安全行为的结构方程模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(9):188.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.033]
　WANG Dan,GONG Jingjing.SEM of leadership behavior, safety culture and safety behavior of miners[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(10):188.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.033]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2021-04-06
* 基金项目： 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2020MS046）
作者简介： 林新奇，博士，教授，主要研究方向为人力资源管理、绩效管理、战略管理。
通信作者： 赵国龙，博士研究生，主要研究方向为人力资源管理、安全管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-03