|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周波,梁爽,王鹏程,等.井喷喷射火热辐射影响范围与模型对比分析研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(2):139-144.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.02.021]
 ZHOU Bo,LIANG Shuang,WANG Pengcheng,et al.Comparative analysis on influence ranges and models of thermal radiation by jet fire in well blowout accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(2):139-144.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.02.021]
点击复制

井喷喷射火热辐射影响范围与模型对比分析研究*
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
18
期数:
2022年2期
页码:
139-144
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2022-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative analysis on influence ranges and models of thermal radiation by jet fire in well blowout accident
文章编号:
1673-193X(2022)-02-0139-06
作者:
周波梁爽王鹏程罗方伟张绪亮郑钰山
(1.中国石油天然气股份有限公司 塔里木油田分公司,新疆 库尔勒 841000;
2.中国石油集团安全环保技术研究院有限公司,北京 102206)
Author(s):
ZHOU Bo LIANG Shuang WANG Pengcheng LUO Fangwei ZHANG Xuliang ZHENG Yushan
(1.PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Branch,Korla Xinjiang 841000,China;
2.CNPC Research Institute of Safety & Environment Technology,Beijing 102206,China)
关键词:
井喷喷射火热辐射FlacsThornton模型
Keywords:
well blowout jet fire thermal radiation Flacs Thornton model
分类号:
X932;X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.02.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了评价井喷事故时喷射火的风险,对比分析Flacs、Thornton模型和点源模型在不同泄漏速率、风速下喷射火热辐射强度计算结果,探讨在相同泄漏速率或相同风速下各模型之间的差异。根据塔里木某口油井的工况,分析在风速为7 m/s,泄漏速率分别为200,170,140,120,90 kg/s和在泄漏速率为140 kg/s时风速为12,7,3 m/s工况下热辐射强度随距离的变化,讨论热辐射强度的空间分布和安全距离的动态变化过程,分析在相同工况相同距离处3种模型的热辐射强度差异及原因。研究结果表明:一般情况下,点源模型、Flacs和Thornton模型在相同位置处所计算的热辐射强度依次增大。由于Thornton模型中未包含修正系数,故通过对比分析结果为Thornton模型添加修正系数以应用于实际。
Abstract:
In order to evaluate the risk of jet fire in the well blowout accidents,the calculation results of the thermal radiation intensity of jet fire under different leakage rates and wind speeds by the Flacs,Thornton model and point source model were compared and analyzed,and the difference between the models under the same leakage rate or wind speed was discussed.According to the working conditions of an oil well in Tarim,the variation of thermal radiation with distance under the conditions of the leakage rate of 200 kg/s,170 kg/s,140 kg/s,120 kg/s,90 kg/s respectively with the wind speed of 7 m/s,and the wind speed of 12 m/s,7 m/s and 3 m/s respectively with leakage rate of 140 kg/s was analyzed.The spatial distribution of thermal radiation intensity and the dynamic change process of safe distance were discussed,and the difference and reasons of thermal radiation intensity by three models at the same distance under the same working conditions were analyzed.The results showed that in general,the thermal radiation calculated by Flacs,point source model and Thornton model at the same location increased in turn.Because the Thornton model did not contain the correction coefficient,through the comparative analysis results,the correction coefficient was added to the Thornton model to apply in practice.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐龙君,吴江,李洪强.重庆开县井喷事故的环境影响分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2005(5):84-87,2.XU Longjun,WU Jiang,LI Hongqiang.Environmental impact analysis of blowout accident in Kaixian County,Chongqing[J].Chinese Safety Science Journal,2005(5):84-87,2.
[2]中国石油天然气集团公司.井喷事故案例汇编[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006:37-38.
[3]杜钢,于洋飞,熊朝东,等.钻井井喷失控因素分析及预防对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(2):120-125.DU Gang,YU Yangfei,XIONG Chaodong,et al.Analysis on factors and preventive action for drilling uncontrollable blowout[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2014,10(2):120-125.
[4]席学军.点火因素对于重大井喷事故的影响分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(12):17-21.XI Xuejun.Analysis of influence of ignition factor on serious accident of blowout[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(12):17-21.
[5]吉安琪.石油化工场所喷射火灾数值模拟研究[D].抚顺:辽宁石油化工大学,2020.
[6]安超,李磊,张爱良,等.基于FLACS CFD的不同气油比油气混输管道泄漏火灾后果对比[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(6):67-73.AN Chao,LI Lei,ZHANG Ailiang,et al.Comparison of consequences caused by leakage fire of oil-gas mixed transmission pipeline with different gas-oil ratios based on FLACS CFD[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2019,15(6):67-73.
[7]李云涛,张振永,刘玉卿,等.天然气管道全管径断裂事故影响范围研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(9):149-154.LI Yuntao,ZHANG Zhenyong,LIU Yuqing,et al.Study on the impact range of the natural gas pipeline full diameter fracture accident[J].Chinese Safety Science Journal,2020,30(9):149-154.
[8]张媛媛,黄有波,吕淑然.矩形泄漏孔水平喷射火热辐射研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(6):73-78.ZHANG Yuanyuan,HUANG Youbo,LYU Shuran.Research on horizontal jet fire heat radiation of rectangular leak hole[J].Chinese Safety Science Journal,2017,27(6):73-78.
[9]GEXCON AS.FLACS v10.7 user’s manual[M].Bergen:GEXCON AS,2017:452.
[10]杨军辉.某散货船LNG储罐喷射火灾特性研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2018.
[11]VAN DEN BOSCH,C.J.H.,WETERINGS,et al.Methods for the calculation of physical effects (TNO Yellow Book)[M].The Hague,The Netherlands:Public AtiereeksGevaarlijke Stoffen,1997.
[12]STEPHENS M J.A model for sizing high consequence areas associated with natural gas pipelines[R].Gas Research Institute,2000.
[13]王其华,李占稳,雷文章,等.基于CFD的井喷失控喷射火温度场和辐射场模拟仿真[J].火灾科学,2009,18(1):34-38.WANG Qihua,LI Zhanwen,LEI Wenzhang,etal.Simulation of the blowout jet fire temperature field and radiation field based on CFD[J].Fire Safety Science,2009,18(1):34-38.
[14]魏沁汝,姚安林,罗阳,等.天然气长输管道事故影响范围研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(5):98-103.WEI Qinru,YAO Anlin,LUO Yang,et al.Study on influence range of accidents in long distance gas pipeline[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016,12(5):98-103.

相似文献/References:

[1]隋秀香,尹邦堂,张兴全,等.含硫油气井井控技术及管理方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):80.
 SUI Xiu-xiang,YIN Bang-tang,ZHANG Xing-quan,et al.Well Control Technology and Management Method for Sulfur Oil and Gas Wells[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):80.
[2]任美鹏,李相方,尹邦堂,等.基于模糊数学钻井井喷概率计算模型研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(1):81.
 REN Mei-peng,LI Xiang-fang,YIN Bang-tang,et al.Study on calculating model of drilling blowout probability based on fuzzy mathematics[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):81.
[3]李玉军,任美鹏,李相方,等.新疆油田钻井井喷风险分级及井控管理[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(7):113.
 LI Yu jun,REN Mei peng,LI Xiang fang,et al.Risk ranking and wellcontrol measures of drilling blowout in Xinjiang Oilfield[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):113.
[4]金业权,方传新,纪永强.石油钻井井控风险诱因专家调查分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):74.
 JIN Ye quan,FANG Chuan xin,JI Yong qiang.Expert survey analysis of well control risk incentives for oil drilling[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):74.
[5]薛鲁宁,樊建春,张来斌.海上钻井井喷事故的蝴蝶结模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):79.
 XUE Lu ning,FAN Jian chun,ZHANG Lai bin.Bowtie model for offshore drilling blowout accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(2):79.
[6]程宗华,樊建春,杜民,等.基于Fluent的井喷失控有毒气体扩散模拟研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(9):24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.005]
 CHENG Zong hua,FAN Jian chun,DU Min,et al.Research on simulation of toxic gas diffusion for uncontrolled blowout based on fluent[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(2):24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.005]
[7]孟会行,陈国明,朱 渊,等.基于PERT图的LMRP集油罩深水井喷应急作业设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(2):114.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.019]
 MENG Hui xing,CHEN Guo ming,ZHU Yuan,et al.PERTbased design of LMRP cap emergency operation for deepwater blowout[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(2):114.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.019]
[8]杜 钢,于洋飞,熊朝东,等.钻井井喷失控因素分析及预防对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(2):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.020]
 DU Gang,YU Yang fei,XIONG Chao dong,et al.Analysis on factors and preventive action for drilling uncontrollable blowout[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(2):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.020]
[9]董炳燕,黄有波,孟江,等.障碍物对天然气喷射火影响的数值模拟研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):111.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.021]
 DONG Bingyan,HUANG Youbo,MENG Jiang,et al.Numerical simulation on influence of obstacle on jet fire of natural gas[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(2):111.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.021]
[10]徐文静,刘少杰,陈国明,等.深水内波条件下井喷原油扩散规律数值仿真分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(11):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.002]
 XU Wenjing,LIU Shaojie,CHEN Guoming,et al.Numerical simulation on diffusion law of crude oil resulting from blowout under internal wave in deep water[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(2):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2021-06-01
* 基金项目: 塔里木油田目的层溢流、漏喷转换在用处置方法评估与提升(201019111038)
作者简介: 周波,硕士研究生,高级工程师,主要研究方向为钻井工艺。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-18