|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王霞,段庆全.基于改进理想点解法的油气管道事故综合预测研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(4):119-125.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.04.019]
　WANG Xia,DUAN Qingquan.Study on comprehensive prediction of oil and gas pipeline accidents based on improved TOPSIS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(4):119-125.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.04.019]
点击复制

基于改进理想点解法的油气管道事故综合预测研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年4期
页码:
119-125
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2018-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on comprehensive prediction of oil and gas pipeline accidents based on improved TOPSIS
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-04-0119-07
作者:
王霞; 段庆全
（中国石油大学（北京） 机械与储运工程学院，北京 102249）
Author(s):
WANG Xia;  DUAN Qingquan
(College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)
关键词:
油气管道; 事故综合预测; 改进理想点解法; 改进层次分析法; 多属性决策; 贴近度
Keywords:
oil and gas pipeline;  comprehensive prediction of accident;  improved TOPSIS;  improved AHP;  multiple attribute decision making;  closeness
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.04.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了提高对油气管道事故的综合预测能力,进而降低油气管道事故的发生概率，基于多属性决策理论的理想点解法，研究提出了基于改进理想点解法的油气管道事故综合预测模型。从引起油气管道失效原因分类的角度，构建油气管道事故综合预测指标体系；基于五标度法的改进层次分析法计算指标权重；在此基础上，应用改进理想点解法计算各油气管道的贴近度，根据贴近度值确定各管段事故发生的可能性；以某条长输管线为例，进行了实证分析。研究结果表明:基于改进理想点解法的油气管道事故综合预测结果与实际情况高度吻合；该方法为管道企业从整体上掌握油气管道的安全状况提出了1种新的科学方法，可为管道企业进行管道完整性管理提供决策支持。
Abstract:
In order to improve the comprehensive prediction ability and reduce the occurrence probability of the oil and gas pipeline accidents, a comprehensive prediction model of oil and gas pipeline accidents based on improved TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution) was proposed based on TOPSIS with the theory of multiple attribute decision making. The index system of comprehensive prediction on the oil and gas pipeline accidents was constructed from the perspective of classifying the reasons causing the failure of oil and gas pipeline, and the index weights were calculated by using the improved analytic hierarchy process(AHP)based on the five-scale method. On this basis, the improved TOPSIS was applied to calculate the closeness of each oil and gas pipeline, then the accident possibility of each pipeline section was determined according to the closeness value. Taking a long-distance pipeline as an example, the empirical analysis was carried out. The results showed that the comprehensive prediction results of the oil and gas pipeline accidents based on the improved TOPSIS were highly consistent with the actual situation. This method provides a new scientific way for the pipeline enterprises to master the safety condition of the oil and gas pipelines as a whole, and thus provides the decision support for the pipeline enterprises to conducted the pipeline integrity management.

参考文献/References:

［1］EL-ABBASY M S, SENOUCI A, ZAYED T, et al. Artificial neural network models for predicting condition of offshore oil and gas pipelines［J］. Automation in Construction, 2014, 45(45): 50-65.
［2］SENOUCI A, ELABBASY M, ELWAKIL E, et al. A model for predicting failure of oil pipelines［J］. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2014, 10(3): 375-387.
［3］WU Jiansong, ZHOU Rui, XU Shengdi, et al. Probabilistic analysis of natural gas pipeline network accident based on Bayesian network［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 46(46): 126-136.
［4］张新生, 赵梦旭, 王小完. 尾段残差修正GM(1,1)模型在管道腐蚀预测中的应用［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1):65-70. ZHANG Xinsheng，ZHAO Mengxu, WANG Xiaowan. Application of GM (1,1) model with residual error correction in pipeline corrosion prediction［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(1):65-70.
［5］陈玉超, 蒋宏业, 吴瑶晗, 等. 基于Bow-tie模型的城镇输油管道风险评价方法研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(4):148-152. CHEN Yuchao, JIANG Hongye，WU Yaohan，et al. Study on risk assessment method of urban oil pipeline based on Bow-tie model［J］.Journal of Safety Scienceand Technology,2016,12(4):148-152.
［6］韩小明, 苗绘, 王哲. 基于大数据和神经网络的管道完整性预测方法［J］. 油气储运, 2015, 34(10):1042-1046. HAN Xiaoming, MIAO Hui，WANG Zhe. Based on large data and neural network of pipeline integrity prediction method ［J］. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(10):1042-1046.
［7］郑小平, 刘梦婷, 李伟. 事故综合预测方法研究述评［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2008, 8(3):162-169. ZHENG Xiaoping，LIU Mengting，LI Wei. A review of the research on accident prediction methods［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2008, 8(3):162-169.
［8］HATAMI-MARBINI A, KANGI F. An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran stock exchange［J］. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 52: 1084-1097.
［9］PATIL S K, KANT R. A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in Supply Chain to overcome its barriers［J］. Expert Systems With Applications, 2014, 41(2): 679-693.
［10］王新民, 秦健春, 张钦礼, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的姑山驻留矿采矿方法优选［J］. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(3):1131-1137. WANG Xinmin， QIN Jianchun, ZHANG Qinli, et al. Optimization of mining methods for Gushan resident mine based on AHP-TOPSIS evaluation model［J］. Journal of Central South University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 44(3):1131-1137.
［11］周科平, 雷涛, 胡建华. 深部金属矿山RS-TOPSIS岩爆预测模型及其应用［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(S2):3705-3711. ZHOU Kepin, LEI Tao, HU Jianhua. Prediction model of RS-TOPSIS rock burst in deep metal mine and its application ［J］. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2):3705-3711.
［12］贾宝山, 尹彬, 王翰钊, 等. AHP耦合TOPSIS的煤矿安全评价模型及其应用［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(8):99-105. JIA Baoshan, YIN Bin, WANG Hanzhao, et al. Coal mine safety evaluation model with AHP-TOPSIS and its application［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(8):99-105.
［13］KARAHALIOS H. The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators［J］. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 2017, 52(A): 172-184.
［14］陈金强, 李群湛. 基于灰色TOPSIS和DGA的变压器状态预测［J］. 高压电器, 2015, 51(9):39-43. CHEN Jinqiang, LI Qunzhan. Transformer state prediction based on gray TOPSIS and DGA［J］. High voltage electrical appliances, 2015, 51(9):39-43.
［15］程文清，李新叶.基于改进理想点解法的电力变压器状态综合评估［J］.高压电器，2009，45（6）：120-123, 127. CHENG Wenqing, LI Xinye. Comprehensive evaluation of power transformer state based on improved TOPSIS［J］. High voltage electrical appliances, 2009, 45(6):120-123,127.
［16］狄彦, 帅健, 王晓霖, 等. 油气管道事故原因分析及分类方法研究［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(7):109-115. DI Yan, SHUAI Jian, WANG Xiaolin, et al. Cause analysis and classification of oil and gas pipeline accident［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(7):109-115.
［17］俞树荣, 马欣, 梁瑞, 等. 基于层次分析法的管道风险因素权数确定［J］. 天然气工业, 2005, 25(6):132-133. YU Shurong, MA Xin, LIANG Rui, et al. Determining the weight of pipeline risk factors based on analytic hierarchy process［J］. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(6):132-133.
［18］易云兵, 姚安林. 基于不确定层次分析法确定管道风险因素权重［J］. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(3):149-151. YI Yunbing, YAO Anlin. Determining the weight of pipeline risk factors based on uncertain analytic hierarchy process［J］. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(3):149-151.
［19］赵忠刚，姚安林，赵学芬，等.油气管道风险因素的权重赋值方法研究［J］.天然气工业，2007，27（7）：103-105, 108. ZHAO Zhonggang, YAO Anlin, ZHAO Xuefen, et al. Study on weight assignment method of risk factors of oil and gas pipeline［J］. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(7):103-105,108.
［20］SUN Haoyang, WANG Sufen, HAO Xinmei. An improved analytic hierarchy process method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of North China［J］. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 179(SI): 324-337.
［21］刘玉玲，游春.改进的层次分析法在公路隧道施工安全评价中的应用［J］.安全与环境工程，2009，16（3）：75-78,91. LIU Yuling, YOU Chun. Application of improved analytic hierarchy process in safety assessment of highway tunnel construction［J］. Safety and environmental engineering， 2009，16（3）：75-78,91.
［22］张天军，苏琳，乔宝明，等.改进的层次分析法在煤与瓦斯突出危险等级预测中的应用［J］.西安科技大学学报，2010，30（5）：536-542,547. ZHANG Tianjun, SU Lin，QIAO Baoming，et al. Application of improved analytic hierarchy process in coal and gas outburst hazard level prediction［J］. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2010, 30(5):536-542,547.

相似文献/References:

[1]辜冬梅,姚安林,尹旭东,等.基于层次-模糊评价法的山区油气管道 地质灾害易发性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):52.
　GU Dong mei,YAO An lin,YIN Xu dong,et al.Study on occurrence of geological hazards for oil and gas pipelines through the mountains based on AHPfuzzy evaluation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):52.
[2]郑登锋,蒋金生,王明勇.基于风险矩阵和LOPA的风险评价系统在油气管道 的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(10):76.
　ZHENG Deng feng,JIANG Jin sheng,WANG Ming yong.Study on application of risk evaluation system based on risk matrix and LOPA in oil and gas pipeline system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):76.
[3]王全国,贺帅斌,党文义.油气管道安全预警技术性能评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(1):98.
　WANG Quan guo,HE Shuai bin,et al.Study on performance evaluation of safety prewarning technology on oil and gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(4):98.
[4]康乐,姚安林,关惠平,等.急倾斜煤层采空区地表移动盆地对油气管道安全影响分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(9):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.019]
　KANG Le,YAO An lin,GUAN Hui pin,et al.Safety influence analysis of subsidence trough on oil & gas pipeline in steeply inclined coalmining area[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(4):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.019]
[5]樊文有,陈 叶,李云海.基于地理信息系统的油气管道安全管理研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(4):175.
　FAN Wen you,CHEN Ye,Li Yun hai.Study on safety management system of gasoil pipeline based on GIS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(4):175.
[6]鲜涛,姚安林,李熠辰,等.基于属性识别理论的油气管道施工质量风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.015]
　XIAN Tao,YAO An-lin,LI Yi-chen,et al.Risk assessment on constructing quality of oil & gas pipeline based on attribute recognition theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(4):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.015]
[7]王如君.灰色-马尔科夫链模型在埋地油气管道腐蚀预测中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.016]
　WANG Ru-jun,WANG Tian-yu.Application of grey Markov chain model in corrosion forecast of buried oil and gas pipelines[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(4):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.016]
[8]张杰,梁政,韩传军,等.落石冲击作用下架设油气管道响应分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(7):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.07.002]
　ZHANG Jie,LIANG Zheng,HAN Chuan-jun,et al.Analysis on response of overhead oil and gas pipeline impacted by rock-fall[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(4):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.07.002]
[9]冯晓东,张圣柱,王如君,等.加拿大油气管道安全管理体系及其启示[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(6):180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.032]
　FENG Xiaodong,ZHANG Shengzhu,WANG Rujun,et al.Study on safety management system of oil and gas pipeline in Canada and its implications[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(4):180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.032]
[10]张圣柱,王如君,多英全,等.国家油气管道地图系统架构探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(11):164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.028]
　ZHANG Shengzhu,WANG Rujun,DUO Yingquan,et al.Discussion on architecture of national oil and gas pipeline mapping system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(4):164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.028]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家重点研发计划课题（2017YFC0805801,2016YFC0802105）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-08