|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王全国,贺帅斌,党文义.油气管道安全预警技术性能评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(1):98-102.
　WANG Quan guo,HE Shuai bin,et al.Study on performance evaluation of safety prewarning technology on oil and gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(1):98-102.
点击复制

油气管道安全预警技术性能评估研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
9
期数:
2013年1期
页码:
98-102
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2013-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on performance evaluation of safety prewarning technology on oil and gas pipeline
文章编号:
1673-193X(2013)-01-0098-05
作者:
王全国1; 2; 贺帅斌3; 党文义1; 2
(1 中国石油化工股份有限公司 青岛安全工程研究院,山东 青岛〓266071；2 化学品安全控制国家重点实验室,山东 青岛〓266071；3 昆仑能源投资〈山东〉有限公司质量安全环保部,山东 青岛〓266071)
Author(s):
WANG Quan guo1;  2 ;  HE Shuai bin3;  DANG Wen yi1;  2
(1 SINOPEC Research Institute of Safety Engineering, Qingdao Shandong 266071, China；2 State Key Laboratory of Safety and Control for Chemicals, Qingdao Shandong 266071, China；3 Kunlun Energy Investment (Shandong) Company Limited,Qingdao Shandong 266071, China)
关键词:
油气管道;  安全预警技术;  层次分析法;  模糊综合评价;  性能评估
Keywords:
oil and gas pipeline;  safety prewarning technology;  analytic hierarchy process (AHP);  fuzzy comprehensive evaluation;  performance evaluation
分类号:
X937
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根据油气管道安全预警技术的特点和应用现状，确立了评估安全预警技术的6个指标。根据问卷调查的结果，利用层次分析法确定了各指标的权重。通过现场调研和相关文献报道，对4种安全预警技术在6个指标下的性能进行了系统地比较。利用模糊综合评价对每种技术在不同指标下的比较结果进行了排序。结合层次分析法确定的指标权重最终得到了不同油气管道安全预警技术的综合性能评估结果，并对结果进行了分析。研究结果表明, 基于层次分析法的模糊综合评价对油气管道安全预警技术进行性能评估具有较强的实用性, 可为企业选择合适的安全预警技术提供有力依据。
Abstract:
According to the characteristics and application situation of safety prewarning technology on oil and gas pipeline, six assessment indices for safety prewarning technology were established. The weight of each index was determined using AHP according to the result of questionnaire. Through field investigation and related literatures, the performance of four kinds of safety prewarning technology were systematically compared under six indices. Comparison results of each kind of technology under different index were sorted utilizing fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Combining with the index weight determined by AHP, the comprehensive performance evaluation results of different safety prewarning technology of oil and gas pipeline were finally obtained, and the results were analyzed. The analysis showed that fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on AHP has strong practicality in the performance evaluation of safety prewarning technology of oil and gas pipeline, which provides strong basis for enterprises to choose the suitable safety prewarning technology.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]辜冬梅,姚安林,尹旭东,等.基于层次-模糊评价法的山区油气管道 地质灾害易发性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):52.
　GU Dong mei,YAO An lin,YIN Xu dong,et al.Study on occurrence of geological hazards for oil and gas pipelines through the mountains based on AHPfuzzy evaluation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):52.
[2]郑登锋,蒋金生,王明勇.基于风险矩阵和LOPA的风险评价系统在油气管道 的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(10):76.
　ZHENG Deng feng,JIANG Jin sheng,WANG Ming yong.Study on application of risk evaluation system based on risk matrix and LOPA in oil and gas pipeline system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):76.
[3]康乐,姚安林,关惠平,等.急倾斜煤层采空区地表移动盆地对油气管道安全影响分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(9):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.019]
　KANG Le,YAO An lin,GUAN Hui pin,et al.Safety influence analysis of subsidence trough on oil & gas pipeline in steeply inclined coalmining area[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(1):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.019]
[4]樊文有,陈 叶,李云海.基于地理信息系统的油气管道安全管理研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(4):175.
　FAN Wen you,CHEN Ye,Li Yun hai.Study on safety management system of gasoil pipeline based on GIS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(1):175.
[5]鲜涛,姚安林,李熠辰,等.基于属性识别理论的油气管道施工质量风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.015]
　XIAN Tao,YAO An-lin,LI Yi-chen,et al.Risk assessment on constructing quality of oil & gas pipeline based on attribute recognition theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(1):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.015]
[6]王如君.灰色-马尔科夫链模型在埋地油气管道腐蚀预测中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.016]
　WANG Ru-jun,WANG Tian-yu.Application of grey Markov chain model in corrosion forecast of buried oil and gas pipelines[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(1):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.016]
[7]张杰,梁政,韩传军,等.落石冲击作用下架设油气管道响应分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(7):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.07.002]
　ZHANG Jie,LIANG Zheng,HAN Chuan-jun,et al.Analysis on response of overhead oil and gas pipeline impacted by rock-fall[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(1):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.07.002]
[8]冯晓东,张圣柱,王如君,等.加拿大油气管道安全管理体系及其启示[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(6):180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.032]
　FENG Xiaodong,ZHANG Shengzhu,WANG Rujun,et al.Study on safety management system of oil and gas pipeline in Canada and its implications[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.032]
[9]张圣柱,王如君,多英全,等.国家油气管道地图系统架构探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(11):164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.028]
　ZHANG Shengzhu,WANG Rujun,DUO Yingquan,et al.Discussion on architecture of national oil and gas pipeline mapping system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.028]
[10]舒畅,姚安林,韩昌柴,等.基于投影寻踪聚类的油气管道失效可能性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(12):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.017]
　SHU Chang,YAO Anlin,HAN Changchai,et al.Assessment on failure probability of oil and gas pipeline based on projection pursuit cluster[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2012-08-17
作者简介：王全国，工程师。
基金项目：中国石化安全环保局安保基金项目（G10-WT-10-001）
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-01-31