[1]谭钦文,段正肖,董勇,等.基于事故数据分析推导的全国及化工行业可接受风险标准基准值研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(9):185-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.030]
TAN Qinwen,DUAN Zhengxiao,DONG Yong,et al.Study on standard reference values of acceptable risk criteria for nation and chemical industry based on accident data analysis and derivation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(9):185-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.030]
点击复制
基于事故数据分析推导的全国及化工行业可接受风险标准基准值研究
TAN Qinwen,DUAN Zhengxiao,DONG Yong,et al.Study on standard reference values of acceptable risk criteria for nation and chemical industry based on accident data analysis and derivation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(9):185-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.030]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 13
- 期数:
- 2017年9期
- 页码:
- 185-192
- 栏目:
- 现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2017-09-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Study on standard reference values of acceptable risk criteria for nation and chemical industry based on accident data analysis and derivation
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2017)-09-0185-08
- Keywords:
- basic accident data; collection and derivation; nation and chemical industry; acceptable risk criteria; standard reference value
- 分类号:
- X959
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了探索行业风险可接受现状，印证已颁布的可接受风险标准中标准基准值选取的可行性，基于可接受风险标准理论，通过搜集、分析及估算全国及化工行业最近10 a的基础事故数据，采用平均个人风险值法（AIR）和事故累计概率-死亡人数曲线（FN曲线）法的运算思想，确定了全国及化工行业的死亡、受伤及职业病风险个人/社会可接受标准基准值，并通过数据范围的选择将其分为宽松型、通用型及严格型3种不同“严格”程度的基准值以备不同条件下选用。研究结果表明：死亡标准基准值通过与已颁布的标准基准值进行对比后发现2者均处于同一量级（10-4），印证了彼此的可行性，受伤及职业病标准基准值可为后期该领域的研究提供参考。
- Abstract:
- To explore the current status of industrial acceptable risk, and verify the feasibility of the standard reference value selected in the issued standard of acceptable risk, based on the theory of acceptable risk criteria, through collecting, analyzing and estimating the basic accident data of the nation and chemical industry in the last 10 years, the standard reference values of individual and societal acceptable criteria for the death, injury and occupational disease risk of the nation and chemical industry were determined by using the operational ideas of the average individual risk value method (AIR) and the curve of accident cumulative probability against death toll (FN curve) method, and the standard reference values were divided into three types with different "strict" degree, including loose type, general type and strict type, through the selection of data range for the use under different conditions. The results showed that the standard reference value of death was in the same order of magnitude (10-4) with the issued standard reference value, which verified the feasibility of each other. The standard reference values of injury and occupational disease can provide reference for the later research in this field.
参考文献/References:
［1］张舒,李夏林,吴超,等. 我国煤矿可接受风险标准研究［J］. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(1):158-164.
ZHANG Shu, LI Xialin, WU Chao, et al. China's coal mine［J］. Acceptable risk criteria of China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(1): 158-164.
［2］李宗坤,葛巍,王娟,等.中国水库大坝风险标准与应用研究［J］. 水利学报,2015,46(5):567-573.
LI Zongkun, GE Wei, WANG Juan, et al. Chinese reservoir dam risk criteria and application［J］. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 2015,46 (5): 567-573.
［3］李剑峰,刘茂,冉丽君. 公共场所人群聚集个人风险的研究［J］. 安全与环境学报,2006,6(5):112-115.
LI Jianfeng, LIU Mao, RAN Lijun. Study on personal risk aggregation public［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2006,6(5): 112-115.
［4］李漾,周昌玉,张伯君. 石油化工行业可接受风险水平研究［J］. 安全与环境学报,2007,7(6):116-119.
LI Yang, ZHOU Changyu, ZHANG Bojun. Study on acceptable risk level in petrochemical industry［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 7(6): 116-119.
［5］郭章林,贾增科,李晓慧. 建筑工程施工风险接受准则研究［J］. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008,40(1):76-79.
GUO Zhanglin, JIA Zengke, LI Xiaohui. Study on risk acceptance criteria for construction engineering［J］. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (Natural Science Editionhse), 2008, 40(1): 76-79.
［6］尚志海. 泥石流灾害综合风险货币化评估及可接受风险研究［D］.广州：中山大学,2012.
［7］曾珠,罗云,杨燕鹏,等. 特种设备社会风险水平定量分析［J］. 中国安全科学学报,2014,24(8):119-124.
ZENG Zhu,LUO Yun, YANG Yanpeng, et al. Quantitative social risk level analysis of［J］. Chinese Special Equipment Safety Science Journal, 2014,24(8): 119-124.
［8］李宝岩. 可接受风险标准研究［D］.镇江：江苏大学,2010.
［9］赵来军,吴萍,许科. 我国危险化学品事故统计分析及对策研究［J］. 中国安全科学学报,2009,19(7):165-170.
ZHAO Laijun, WU Ping, XU Ke. Statistical analysis and countermeasure study of hazardous chemicals accidents in China［J］. Chinese Journal of Safety Science, 2009, 19(7): 165-170.
［10］于水军,潘荣锟,余明高,等. 2005年全国危险化学品事故统计分析［J］. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,12(6):452-456.
YU Shuijun, PAN Rongkun, YU Ming Gao, et al. Statistical analysis of national hazardous chemicals accidents in 2005［J］. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science Editionhse), 2006, 12(6): 452-456.
［11］李健,白晓昀,任正中,等. 2011—2013年我国危险化学品事故统计分析及对策研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(6):142-147.
LI Jian, BAI Xiaoyun, REN Zhong, et al. Statistical analysis and Countermeasures of hazardous chemicals accidents in China in 2011—2013 years［J］. Safety Science and Technology in China, 2014,10(6): 142-147.
［12］周建新,任智刚,刘功智. 我国生产安全事故伤亡比率分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2008,4(2):22-25.
ZHOU Jianxin, REN Zhigang, LIU Gongzhi. Analysis of the casualty rate of safety accidents in China［J］. Safety Science and Technology in China, 2008, 4(2): 22-25.
［13］冯长根,王亚军. 2007年中国安全生产事故与自然灾害状况［J］. 安全与环境学报,2007,8(6):131-146.
FENG Changgen, WANG Yajun. Status of safety production accidents and natural disasters in China in 2007.［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 8(6): 131-146.
［14］李生才,笑蕾. 2016年11-12月国内生产安全事故统计分析［J］. 安全与环境学报,2017,17(1):395-396.
LI Shengcai, XIAO Lei. Statistical analysis of domestic production safety accidents in 2016 11-12［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017, 17(1): 395-396.
［15］李海江,姜福川. 2010年我国危化品事故人员伤亡统计分析［J］. 安全,2012,33(5):42-45.
LI Haijiang, JIANG Fuchuan. Statistical analysis of casualties in hazardous chemical accidents in China in 2010［J］.Safety, 2012, 33(5): 42-45.
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家自然科学基金项目(51404200)；四川省教育厅重点项目(14ZA0089)
