|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]赵志峰,文虎,樊恒,等.粗糙集和熵权计算法在多因素指标评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(9):180-184.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.029]
 ZHAO Zhifeng,WEN Hu,FAN Heng,et al.Application of rough set and entropy weight calculation method in the multi-factor index evaluation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(9):180-184.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.029]
点击复制

粗糙集和熵权计算法在多因素指标评价中的应用
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
13
期数:
2017年9期
页码:
180-184
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2017-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of rough set and entropy weight calculation method in the multi-factor index evaluation
文章编号:
1673-193X(2017)-09-0180-05
作者:
赵志峰1文虎2樊恒1朱凯然1
(1. 西安石油大学 电子工程学院,陕西 西安 710065;2. 西安科技大学 安全科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
ZHAO Zhifeng1 WEN Hu2 FAN Heng1 ZHU Kairan1
(1. School of Electronic Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710065, China; 2. College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an Shaanxi 710054, China)
关键词:
多因素指标评价核心因素粗糙集熵权计算法
Keywords:
multi-factor index evaluation core factor rough set entropy weight calculation method
分类号:
O213.2;TG172.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了提高分析多因素指标评价中核心因素选取和权重计算的准确性,根据粗糙集处理数据的特点,以及熵权法计算权重的客观性,提出将粗糙集和熵权计算法结合进行核心因素选取和指标权重的计算。以土壤腐蚀多因素指标评价为例,针对其粗糙集应用中离散化数据时的失值问题,以及熵权计算法中无量纲化处理时标准的不统一,提出了土壤腐蚀等级的分类离散化方法和熵权计算法中无量纲化的同级变换公式,结果得到了2种方法计算数值的相互验证,增加了针对指标权重分析的应用性和可靠性。
Abstract:
In order to improve the accuracy of the core factors selection and the weight calculation in the multi-factor index evaluation, the method that combined rough set and entropy weight calculation for the core factors selection and index weight calculation was put forward based on the characteristics of rough set to deal with data and the objectivity of entropy weight method to calculate the weight. Taking the multi-factor index evaluation of the soil corrosion as example, aiming at the problem of lost value when discretizing the data in the rough set application and the problem of non-uniform standard during the dimensionless processing in the entropy weight calculation method, the classification discretization method of soil corrosion grade and the same level conversion formula of non-dimensionalization in the entropy weight calculation method were put forward. The mutual verification of the calculation results by these two methods was obtained, which increases the applicability and reliability for the index weight analysis.

参考文献/References:

[1]李军,张宏,梁海滨.基于模糊综合评价的燃气管道第三方破坏失效研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):140-145. LI Jun,ZHANG Hong,LIANG Haibin. Study on failure of gas pipeline due to third party damage based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016,12(8):140-145.
[2]国家能源局. 油气管道风险评价方法第一部分半定量评价法:SY 6891.1-2012T [S].北京:石油工业出版社,2012.
[3]文虎,赵志峰,郭军. 集对理论聚类分析法综合预测煤与瓦斯突出[J].西安科技大学学报,2015,35(5):547-554. WEN Hu, ZHAO Zhifeng, GUO Jun. Comprehensive forecast of coal and gas outburst on the basis of set pair theory and clustering analysis method[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2015,35(5):547-554.
[4]Pawlak Z. Rough sets[J].International Journal of Information and Computer Science. 1982,11(5):341-356.
[5]张延松,赵英凯.基于PCA和粗糙集构建决策树的变电站故障诊断[J].电力系统保护与控制,2010,38(14):104-109. ZHANG Yansong, ZHAO Yingkai. Fault diagnosis of substation by the constructed decision tree based on principal component analysis(PCA) and rough set[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2010, 38(14):104-109.
[6]王书明.煤矿安全投入系统分析及其决策的研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2008.
[7]ZHAO Zhifeng,WEN Hu, GAO Weixin. The pipeline soil corrosion comprehensive prediction method of multi-method integration[J].International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science and Technology,2016,17(26):19-26.
[8]张鹏飞.一种基于熵的连续属性离散方法[J].燃气涡轮试验与研究,2014,27(6):49-52. ZHANG Pengfei. A Method of Continuous Attributes Discretization Based on Entropy[J].Gas Turbine Experiment and Research,2014,27(6):49-52.
[9]李慧.一种基于粗糙集理论的连续属性离散化新算法[J].计算机应用研究,2010,27(1):77-78. LI Hui. Novel algorithm for discretization of continuous attributes based on rough set theory[J].Application Research of Computers,2010,27(1):77-78.
[10]赵志峰,文虎,高炜欣,等.长输管道完整性管理中的数据挖掘和知识决策[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,31(4):109-114. ZHAO Zhifeng, WEN Hu, GAO Weixin, et al. Data mining and knowledge decision in the integrity management of long-distance pipeline[J].Journal of Xi an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2016,31(4):109-114. [11]张江江,张志宏.雅克拉气田天然气西气东输管道腐蚀与检测评价[J].腐蚀与防护,2015,36(3):234-239. ZHANG Jiangjiang,ZHANG Zhihong. Corrosion detection and evaluation of west to east nature gas transmission pipeline in yakela gas field[J].Corrosion & Protection,2015,36(3):234-239.
[12]柳华伟,陈杨. 模糊综合评价法在埋地管道腐蚀状况评价中的应用[J].石油工程建设,2011,37(5): 43-45. LIU Huawei, CHEN Yang. Application of fuzzy integrated evaluation method in evaluating corrosion state of buried pipeline[J]. Petroleum Engineering Construction,2011,37(5):43-45.
[13]张弛,王凯全.基于可拓学的燃气管道土壤腐蚀性评价[J].油气储运,2010, 29(11): 848-851. ZHANG Chi, WANG Kaiquan. Soil Corrosivity assessment of gas pipeline based an extenics[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2010, 29(11): 848-851.
[14]赵志峰,文虎,郭军. 基于多方法融合的煤与瓦斯突出综合预测[J].煤矿安全,2015,46(11):160-163. ZHAO Zhifeng,WEN Hu,GUO Jun. Comprehensive forecast of coal and gas outburst based on multiple methods[J].Safety in Coal Mines,2015,46(11):160-163.
[15]杨林娟,沈士明.基于粗糙集理论的故障树重要度分析[J].南京工业大学学报〔自然科学版),2007,29(1):60-64. YANG Linjuan, SHEN Shiming. Importance analysis of the fault tree based on rough set theory[J].Journal of Nanjng University of Technology,2007,29(1):60-64.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(15JK1592);中国石油科技创新基金研究项目(2014D-5006-0605)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-10-12