|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈玉超,蒋宏业,吴瑶晗,等.基于Bow-tie模型的城镇输油管道风险评价方法研[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(4):148-152.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.027]
　CHEN Yuchao,JIANG Hongye,WU Yaohan,et al.Study on risk assessment method of urban oil pipeline based on Bow-tie model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(4):148-152.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.027]
点击复制

基于Bow-tie模型的城镇输油管道风险评价方法研
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年4期
页码:
148-152
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on risk assessment method of urban oil pipeline based on Bow-tie model
作者:
陈玉超1; 蒋宏业1; 2; 吴瑶晗3; 姚安林1; 2; 韩晓瑜1
（1. 西南石油大学 石油与天然气工程学院，四川 成都 610500；
2. 油气消防四川省重点实验室，四川 成都 610500；
3.中国石化天然气输送管道分公司，湖北 武汉 430223）
Author(s):
CHEN Yuchao1;  JIANG Hongye1; 2;  WU Yaohan3;  YAO Anlin1; 2;  HAN Xiaoyu1
(1. College of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China；
2. Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Fire Control of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China；
3. Sichuan Eastern China Gas Transmission Pindine Company of Simopec, Wuhan Hubei 430223, China）
关键词:
城镇输油管道; 风险评价; Bow-tie模型; 改进层次分析法
Keywords:
urban oil pipeline;  risk assessment;  Bow-tie model;  improved analytic hierarchy process
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根据近年来不断发生的城镇输油管道泄漏爆炸事故，提出将Bow-tie模型引入到风险评价中，将Bow-tie模型和改进的层次分析法相结合得出各影响因素的权重并排序，对管道进行风险评价，便于提出合理的安全管理方案，减少事故的发生。通过计算得到第三方因素在管道失效影响因素中占主导，而在事故后果分析中安全后果和环境后果因素影响较大，基本符合事故实际状况，说明该方法对于城镇输油管道风险分析有一定的指导意义和实用价值。
Abstract:
According to the leakage and explosion accidents of urban oil pipeline frequently occurred in recent years, it was proposed to introduce Bow-tie model into risk evaluation. Through the combination of Bow-tie model with the improved analytic hierarchy process method, the weights of each influence factor were obtained and sorted. Then the risk evaluation was conducted on pipeline so as to put forward reasonable safety management schemes and reduce the occurrence of accidents. The calculation results showed that the third party factor dominates in the influence factors of pipeline failure, while in the analysis of accident consequence, the safety consequence and environment consequence factors have the largest influence, which basically accord with the actual situation of accident. It has certain guiding significance and practical value for the risk analysis of urban oil pipeline.

参考文献/References:

［1］李晶晶，朱渊，陈国明，李修峰.城市油气管道泄漏爆炸重大案例应急管理对比研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术，2014，10（8）:11-15. LI Jingjing，ZHU Yuan，CHEN Guoming，LI Xiufeng. Comparative analysis on emergency management for leakage explosion accidents of urban oil and gas pipeline［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2014,10（8）:11-15.
［2］V. Dianous,C. Fievez.ARAMIS Project : A More Explicit Demonstration of Risk Control Through The Use of Bow Tie Diagrams and The Evaluation of Safety Barrier Performance［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials . 2006,130(3):220-240.
［3］LEWIS S,SMITH K.Lessons learned from real world application of the Bow-tie method［C］. American Institute of Chemical Engineers 2010 Spring Meeting . Texas:AIche,2010.
［4］於孝春，贾朋美，张兴.基于模糊Bow-tie模型的城镇燃气管道泄漏定量风险评价［J］.天然气工业，2013(7):134-139. YU Xiaochun,JIA Pengmei,ZHANG Xing.Quantitative risk assessment of urban gas pipelines based on fuzzy Bow-tie model［J］.Natural Gas Industry, 2013(7):134-139.
［5］胡显伟，段梦兰，官耀华.基于模糊Bow-tie模型的深水海底管道定量风险评价研究［J］.中国安全科学学报，2012(3):128-133. HU Xianwei, DUAN Menglan, GUAN Yaohua. Quantitative risk assessment of deepwater submarine pipeline based on fuzzy Bow-tie model［J］. China Safety Science Journal,2012(3):128-133.
［6］张村峰,卞奇侃,蒋军成. 基于“事故树-层次分析法”的高校学生宿舍火灾风险分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):100-105. ZHANG Cunfeng， BIAN Qikan， JIANG Juncheng. Fire risk analysis on university dormitory based on accident tree analysis and analytic hierarchy process ［J］, Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011,7(10):100-105.
［7］郭金玉，张忠彬，孙庆云. 层次分析法在安全科学研究中的应用［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2008,4(2):69-73. GUO Jinyu,ZHANG Zhongbin,SUN Qinyun. Applications of AHP method in safety science［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2008,4(2):69-73.
［8］刘玉玲，游春.改进的层次分析法在公路隧道施工安全评价中的应用［J］.安全与环境工程，2009(3):75-78,91. LIU Yuling,YOU Chun. Application of the improved analytic hierarchy process to risk assessment on road tunnel construction［J］.Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2009(3):75-78,91.
［9］赵长勇.改进层次分析法在油库安全评价中的运用［J］.石油化工安全环保技术，2010(1):14-18,69. ZHAO Changyong. Application of the improved analytic hierarchy process in the safety assessment of oil depots［J］.Petrochemical Safety and Environmental Protection Technology, 2010(1):14-18,69.
［10］胡安鑫，谢英，苏欣.“改进层次分析法”在确定油库安全因素权重中的应用［J］.石油化工安全技术，2005(5):13-15,5. HU Anxin, XIE Ying, SU Xin.Application of improved analytic hierarchy process in defining the weighting of safety factors of oil depot［J］.Petrochemical Safety Technology, 2005(5):13-15,5.
［11］狄彦，帅健，王晓霖，等. 油气管道事故原因分析及分类方法研究［J］. 中国安全科学学报，2013（7）:109-115. DI Yan,SHUAI Jian, WANG Xiaolin, et al. Study on methods for classifying oil ＆ gas pipeline incidents ［J］.China Safety Science Journal, 2013(7):109-115.
［12］杜曼，赵东风，孟亦飞.长输天然气管道泄漏事故后果评价方法与应用［J］.油气储运，2012(5):340-344,408. DU Man,ZHAO Dongfeng,MENG Yifei. Evaluation method of leakage consequence for long-distance gas pipeline and its application［J］.Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2012(5):340-344,408.

相似文献/References:

[1]张晓,张钢.船上劳动安全风险辨识研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):161.
　ZHANG Xiao,ZHANG Gang.A study on risk identification of shipboard working safety[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):161.
[2]许红军,田俊改.支线机场安全动态预警技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):123.
　XU Hong-jun,TIAN Jun-gai.Dynamic hazard identification and evaluation techniques for regional airport safety and security[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):123.
[3]高旭,张圣柱,杨国梁,等.风险沟通研究进展综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):148.
　GAO Xu,ZHANG Sheng-zhu,YANG Guo-liang,et al.Overview on reseach status of risk communication[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):148.
[4]倪红兵.运用危险源控制方法改进职业健康安全管理的有效性[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):187.
　Ni Hong-bing.Thorough Using the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment method to Continual Improvement the Effectiveness of Occupational Health and Safety Management[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):187.
[5]王长建,陈刚.风险因子模糊评价法在钻机安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):149.
　WANG Chang-jian,CHEN Gang.The Applications of Risk Factor Fuzzy Evaluation Method（RFEM）to Risk Assessment of Drilling Rig[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):149.
[6]石荣,李明捷.变权综合法在航空公司风险评价中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):143.
　SHI Rong,LI Ming-jie.Application of variable weight synthetic evaluation method in safety assessment of SMS of civil aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):143.
[7]巫志鹏,白永忠,林景喜.新化工装置风险评价方法的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):154.
　WU Zhi-peng,BAI Yong-zhong,LIN Jing-xi.Study on the methods of hazard risk assessment for new facilities[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(4):154.
[8]徐吉辉,姜帆,张亮.基于SEFA的现役装备改进风险评价指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):53.
　XU Ji hui,JIANG Fan,ZHANG Liang.Research on evaluation index system of active equipment improvement risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):53.
[9]张蒙,冯福亮.成品油库临时性常规作业管理现状分析及改进措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(11):216.
　ZHANG Meng,FENG Fu liang.Present situation analysis and improvement measurement for management of the occasional conventional operation in oil tankfarm[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(4):216.
[10]汪长永,杨卫,殷焕召,等.模糊综合评价法在油气管道跨越工程风险评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):143.
　WANG Chang-yong,YANG Wei,YIN Huan-zhao,et al.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in risk evaluation of pipeline crossing engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(4):143.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目（2011BAK06B01-11-01）
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-05-05