|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]高旭,张圣柱,杨国梁,等.风险沟通研究进展综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):148-152.
　GAO Xu,ZHANG Sheng-zhu,YANG Guo-liang,et al.Overview on reseach status of risk communication[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):148-152.
点击复制

风险沟通研究进展综述()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年5期
页码:
148-152
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2011-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Overview on reseach status of risk communication
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-05-0148-05
作者:
高旭1; 张圣柱1; 杨国梁1; 多英全2
1.中国矿业大学（北京）资源与安全工程学院，北京? 100083
2.中国安全生产科学研究院，北京? 100012
Author(s):
GAO Xu1;  ZHANG Sheng-zhu1;  YANG Guo-liang1;  DUO Ying-quan2
1. Faculty of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing? 100083, China
2. China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing? 100012, China
关键词:
风险沟通; 风险感知; 风险评价
Keywords:
risk communication;  risk perception;  risk assessment
分类号:
X92
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
首先简述了风险沟通研究的社会背景,按照风险沟通研究进程中的重大社会事件和学术事件,将风险沟通的研究划分成三个阶段即研究准备阶段、研究兴起阶段和研究发展阶段。其次,论述了风险沟通研究热点领域的变化,分析了风险沟通研究对象的多元性和多层次性,探讨了单向风险沟通和双向风险沟通的沟通模式转变及其由"告知"到"授权"的功能演进。最后,从风险感知、风险沟通功能、风险沟通目的、风险沟通时间阶段等多个角度阐明了风险沟通的分类。通过对风险沟通研究进展的综述,试图厘清风险沟通研究与风险认识论研究的关系。
Abstract:
The article reviews the development in the field of risk communication. Social background of risk communication is described. According to crucial social events and academic events, research phases of risk communication are divided into three stages. Research focus and their changes in the field of risk communication are debated. Diversity of the subjects investigated in risk communication is analyzed. The change of communication model from uni-directional to double-directional and the function evolution of risk communication from informing to empowering are discussed. The classification of risk communication is made from risk perception, the function, objective, and time phases. Finally, the relationship of risk communication research and risk epistemology research is clarified.

参考文献/References:

[1]张洁,张涛甫.美国风险沟通研究：学术沿革、核心命题及其关键因素[J].公共关系研究.2009.09: 95~101.[2]Covello V.T. Risk Communication: An emerging area of health communication research[C].Communication Yearbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.1992,359~373.[3]Covello V T. Risk perception, risk communication, and EMF exposure: tools and techniques for communicating risk information. In: Matthes R, Bernhardt J H, Repacholi M H, eds. Risk perception, risk communication, and its application to EMF exposure: Proceedings of the World Health Organization, ICNRP International Conference[C],1998,Vienna: International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection,1998,179~214.[4]Williams, D.E., & Olaniran, B.A. Expanding the crisis planning function: Introducing elements of risk communication to crisis communication practice[J].Public Relation Review,24(3),387~400.[5]Douglas, M. , and A. Wildavsky. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press,1982,P194.[6]Heath Robert L., Nathan, Kathy. Public Relations’ Role in Risk Communication: Information, Rhetoric and Power. Public Relations Quarterly; Winter1990-1991;35(4),15.[7]Covello V.T., von Winterfeldt D., Slovic P. Communicating scientific information about health and environmental risks: Problems and opportunities from social and behavioral perspective, in Covello, Moghissi, & Uppuluri, Uncertainties in Risk Assessment and Risk Management[C], New York: Plenum Press,1986.[8]Sandman, P.M. Risk Communication: Facing Public Outrage[J].EPA Journal 13(9),1987,21 ~22.[9]Covello, V.T. Risk Communication: An emerging area of health communication research. Communication Yearbook[C].Newbury Park, CA:sage. 1992, 359~373.[10]Lundgren, R.E. and McMakin, A.H. Risk communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental Safety and Health Risks [M]. Colunbus, OH:Battelle.1998.[11]Seeger, M.W., Sellnow, T.L., & Ulmer, R.R. Public relations and crisis communication: Organizing and chaos. Handbook of Public Relations[C]: London:Sage.2001, 155~166.

相似文献/References:

[1]高旭,石超,张悦,等.浅议风险观对风险评价方法论的影响[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):83.
　GAO Xu,SHI Chao,ZHANG Yue,et al.The guidance implication of risk concept for risk analysis methodologies[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):83.
[2]陈伟,温晋锋,钱城江.化工企业事故决策者风险感知模拟预测研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):92.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.015]
　CHEN Wei,WEN Jinfeng,QIAN Chengjiang.Study on simulation and prediction of risk perception for enterprise decision-maker in chemical accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(5):92.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.015]
[3]李乃文,王春迪,牛莉霞.高危岗位矿工个体风险感知影响因素仿真研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(9):184.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.09.029]
　LI Nai-wen,WANG Chun-di,NIU Li-xia.Simulation of factors affecting individual risk perception of the high-risk position miner[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(5):184.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.09.029]
[4]江新,陈瑶,胡文佳,等.ISM耦合ANP的洞室施工人员风险感知系统脆弱性仿真分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(3):121.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.020]
　JIANG Xin,CHEN Yao,HU Wenjia,et al.Simulation analysis on vulnerability of risk perception system for cavern construction workers with ISM coupling ANP[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(5):121.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.020]
[5]王治莹,杨学亮,梁敬.官方媒体参与下不同风险感知群体竞争模型及其演化规律[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(4):19.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.003]
　WANG Zhiying,YANG Xueliang,LIANG Jing.A competition model and its evolution law of groups with different risk perception under the participation of official media[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(5):19.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.003]
[6]朱建明,王瑞.灾害救援中基于民众心理感知的应急物资多阶段分配问题研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(2):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.001]
　ZHU Jianming,WANG Rui.Study on multistage distribution of emergency materials in disaster rescue based on people’s psychological perception[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(5):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.001]
[7]王传连.生理因素对驾驶人行为及风险感知影响研究综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(4):155.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.04.024]
　WANG Chuanlian.Review of research on effect of physiological factors on behavior and risk perception of drivers[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(5):155.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.04.024]
[8]林琳.基于情景构建的公共安全风险沟通策略研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(6):43.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.06.007]
　LIN Lin.Research on communication strategy of public safety risk based on scenario construction[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(5):43.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.06.007]
[9]齐晓云,刘杰.机场火灾旅客安全态度、风险感知与非适应性疏散行为的关系研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(10):46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.007]
　QI Xiaoyun,LIU Jie.Research on relationship among safety attitude,risk perception and non-adaptive evacuation behavior of passengers in airport fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(5):46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.007]
[10]李华,孔娇.基于文本挖掘的城市景区密集人群风险感知*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(5):40.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.05.006]
　LI Hua,KONG Jiao.Risk perception of dense crowd in urban scenic spots based on text mining[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(5):40.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.05.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2011-02-11
基金项目：国际科技合作项目（编号：2009DFA71840）；中国安全生产科学研究院基本科研业务项目（编号：2009JBKY07）
更新日期/Last Update: