|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]方来华,吴宗之,康荣学,等.安全仪表系统的性能维护及指标值计算[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(11):46.
　FANG Lai-hua,WU Zong-zhi,KANG Rong-xue,et al.Performance maintenance and indicator value calculation of safety instrumented system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):46.
点击复制

安全仪表系统的性能维护及指标值计算
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年11期
页码:
46
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2011-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Performance maintenance and indicator value calculation of safety instrumented system
作者:
方来华； 吴宗之； 康荣学； 张悦；
中国安全生产科学研究院； 中国矿业大学(北京)资源与安全工程学院；
Author(s):
FANG Lai-hua1; WU Zong-zhi1; KANG Rong-xue1; ZHANG Yue2
1.China Academy of Safety Science & Technology,Beijing 100012,China)(2.Faculty of Resources and Safety Engineering;China University of Mining and Technology,Beijing 100083,China
关键词:
安全仪表系统;  性能指标;  失效率;  安全完整性等级;  测试间隔
Keywords:
safety instrumented system;  performance indicator;  failure rate;  safety integrity level;  test interval
分类号:
TH70
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
-
摘要:
安全仪表系统(SIS)作为保障工业生产安全的重要措施,需要在危险发生时正确地执行其安全功能,采取有效措施维持安全仪表系统在运行阶段的性能是保障系统功能安全的关键。详细阐明了SIS在运行阶段应遵循风险评估分析、安全功能分配文件、安全要求规范、安全分析报告、安全完整性等级符合性等重要文档中的要求,给出了维持SIS安全完整性的主要活动,并在加强旁路、禁止和超驰控制管理,对SIS失效的响应、记录和分析,进行定期检查、维护和功能测试以及安全仪表系统的变更管理等方面提出了要求。提出了SIS的安全性能指标及目标值的简易计算方法,给出失效率更新流程、计算方法和功能安全测试间隔调整技术。所提的技术方法为如何保证安全仪表系统运行阶段的安全性能提供了有力指导,其可操作性强,便于在实际工程中进行应用。
Abstract:
Safety Instrumented System(SIS) is an important measure to guarantee industrial production safety,which implements its safety function in case of danger occurrence.Effective measures should be taken to maintain SIS’s performance in operating phase.Various requirements in significant documentations,such as risk analysis,safety function allocation documentation,safety requirements specifications,safety analysis reports,safety integrity level(SIL) compliance documentation,that should be fulfilled and major activities to maintain system safety integrity,are expounded in detail.Requirements of management of bypasses,inhibits and overrides,recording and analysis of SIS failures,regular inspection,maintenance and function testing,and management of change are proposed,Safety performance indicator and its target value calculation approach are proposed.Failure rate updating procedure,calculation mean and techniques of test interval adjustment for functional safety are given.The mentioned techniques provide good guidance in maintaining safety performance in operation phase,which is easy to implement in practical engineer application.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]姜颖.重大危险源安全与自动化监控系统[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):161.
　JIANG Ying.Safety and automation manitoring system for major hazard installations[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(11):161.
[2]方来华,吴宗之,康荣学,等.安全设备失效数据获取与计算[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):121.
　FANG Lai-hua,WU Zong-zhi,KANG Rong-xue,et al.The acquisition and calculation of failure data of safety equipment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(11):121.
[3]李娜,孙文勇,宁信道.HAZOP、LOPA和SIL方法的应用分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):107.
　LI Na,SUN Wen yong,NING Xin dao.The application of HAZOP, LOPA and SIL analytical method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(11):107.
[4]李毅,熊亮,邓海发,等.SIL评估及HAZOP分析技术在海洋平台安全评估中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(8):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.022]
　LI Yi,XIONG Liang,DENG Hai fa,et al.Application of SIL evaluation and HAZOP analysis technology in safety assessment of offshore platform[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(11):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.022]
[5]钱钧,魏利军,李少鹏.安全仪表系统等级划分与HAZOP分析的结合应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(5):148.
　QIAN Jun,WEI Li jun,LI Shao peng.Combined application of safety instrumented system classification and HAZOP analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(11):148.
[6]夏阳光,陶刚,张礼敬.基于FFTA-LOPA的化工装置安全仪表系统SIL确定方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(6):142.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.025]
　XIA Yangguang,TAO Gang,ZHANG Lijing.Study on determination method of SIL for safety instrumented system of chemical plant based on FFTA-LOPA[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(11):142.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.06.025]
[7]李宏浩,付建民,李成美,等.基于Monte Carlo与Markov法参数不确定性条件下SIL评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(9):109.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.020]
　LI Honghao,FU Jianmin,LI Chengmei,et al.SIL evaluation with parameters uncertainty based on Monte Carlo and Markov methods[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(11):109.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.020]
[8]池亚娟,付建民,李宏浩,等.基于人因可靠性的间歇装置SIL分析与改进[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.020]
　CHI Yajuan,FU Jianmin,LI Honghao,et al.Analysis and improvement of safety integrity level for batch equipment based on human reliability[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(11):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.020]
[9]王海清,乔丹菊,冯军,等.石化装置安全仪表系统KooN表决结构的误跳车率定量分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(12):152.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.12.025]
　WANG Haiqing,QIAO Danju,FENG Jun,et al.Quantitative analysis on spurious trip rate of safety instrumented system with KooN voting architectures in petrochemical plant[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(11):152.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.12.025]
[10]张哲,王璐,徐长峰,等.基于检验测试策略的PFD模型建立与分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(2):128.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.02.020]
　ZHANG Zhe,WANG Lu,XU Changfeng,et al.Establishment and analysis of PFD model based on proof test strategy[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(11):128.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.02.020]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
中国安科院基本科研业务(编号:2011JBKY04)
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-01-09