|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张光伟,杨满江,彭震,等.基于正交实验法的储罐泄漏对邻近建筑影响研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(5):13-19.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.05.002]
 ZHANG Guangwei,YANG Manjiang,PENG Zhen,et al.Research on influence of storage tank leakage on adjacent buildings based on orthogonal experimental method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(5):13-19.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.05.002]
点击复制

基于正交实验法的储罐泄漏对邻近建筑影响研究*
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
20
期数:
2024年5期
页码:
13-19
栏目:
特约专栏
出版日期:
2024-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on influence of storage tank leakage on adjacent buildings based on orthogonal experimental method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2024)-05-0013-07
作者:
张光伟杨满江彭震刘晓平
(1.合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽 合肥 230009;
2.中国舰船研究设计中心,湖北 武汉 430070;
3.合肥国轩高科动力能源有限公司,安徽 合肥 230011)
Author(s):
ZHANG Guangwei YANG Manjiang PENG Zhen LIU Xiaoping
(1.College of Civil Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei Anhui 230009,China;
2.China Ship Development and Design Center,Wuhan Hubei 430070,China;
3.Hefei Gotion High-tech Power Energy Co.,Ltd.,Hefei Anhui 230011,China)
关键词:
正交实验法储罐泄漏邻近建筑数值模拟
Keywords:
orthogonal experimental methodstorage tankleakageadjacent buildingnumerical simulation
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.05.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为准确评估气相危险化学品从储罐中意外泄漏对周边环境的影响,以邻近建筑为研究对象,结合正交实验法,针对不同的考察指标,对影响危险气体在周边区域扩散的4个关键因素进行分析。研究结果表明:泄漏位置仅对建筑迎风面危险气体极值体积分数有较为明显的影响,不同泄漏位置造成的差异能达到23.2%。建筑密度的增加导致建筑区域面平均体积分数增加30%以上,而建筑区域危险气体极值体积分数分别降低了9.4%和30.4%。建筑与储罐组间距和建筑密度对于邻近建筑的影响强度(以极差来评价),是泄漏位置和气体种类的1.5~10倍。研究结果可为化工园区安全设计、合理规避事故风险提供参考。
Abstract:
In order to accurately assess the influence of accidental leakage of hazardous gas chemicals from storage tanks on the surrounding environment,taking the adjacent buildings as the research objects and combining with the orthogonal experimental method,four key factors affecting the diffusion of hazardous gas in the surrounding areas were analyzed with focusing on different indicators.The results show that the leakage position has a significant impact only on the extreme volume fraction of hazardous gas on the windward sides of buildings,and the difference caused by different leakage positions can reach 23.2%.The increase of building density leads to the increase of the average volume fraction of the building area by more than 30%,while the extreme volume fraction of hazardous gas in the building area is reduced by 9.4% and 30.4%,respectively.The influence of distance between nearby buildings and tank group and building density on adjacent buildings (evaluated by range) is 1.5~10 times that of leakage position and gas type.The research results can provide reference for the safety design of chemical industry parks and reasonable avoidance of accident risk.

参考文献/References:

[1]WANG B,LI D,WU C.Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents during hot season in China from 1989 to 2019:a statistical investigation[J].Safety Science,2020,129,104788.
[2]周浩霖,朱常龙,蒋军成.基于LOPA逻辑的罐区多米诺效应定量风险评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(5):78-84. ZHOU Haolin,ZHU Changlong,JIANG Juncheng.Quantitative risk assessment of domino effect in tank farm based on LOPA logic[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2022,18(5):78-84.
[3]WANG B,ZHU Z,WU C,et al.PDE accident model from a safety information perspective and its application to Zhangjiakou fire and explosion accident[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2020,68,104333.
[4]SIVARAMAN S,TAUSEEF S M,SIDDIQUI N A.Investigative and probabilistic perspective of the accidental release of styrene:a case study in Vizag,India[J].Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2022,158:55-69.
[5]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.石油化工企业设计防火标准(2018年版):GB 50160—2008[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2008.
[6]TAUSEEF S M,ABBASI T,POMPAPATHI V,et al.Case studies of 28 major accidents of fires/explosions in storage tank farms in the backdrop of available codes/standards/models for safely configuring such tank farms[J].Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2018,120:331-338.
[7]LIU X,ZHANG G,WU M,et al.Study on the potential risks under a hazardous gas leakage accident:effects of source characteristics and ambient wind velocities[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2023,30:17516-17531.
[8]CHANG J I,LIN C C.A study of storage tank accidents[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2006,19(1):51-59.
[9]American Petroleum Institute.Risk-based inspection methodology:API 581 [S].Washington,DC:API Publishing Services,2016.
[10]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
[11]HALL D J,WALKER S.Scaling rules for reduced-scale field releases of hydrogen fluoride[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,1997,54:89-111.
[12]XING J,LIU Z,HUANG P,et al.CFD validation of scaling rules for reduced-scale field releases of carbon dioxide[J].Applied Energy,2014,115:525-530.
[13]SNYDERW H.Similarity criteria for the application of fluid models to the study of air pollution meteorology[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1972,3:113-134.
[14]LIU Y,ZHENG J,XU P,et al.Numerical simulation on the diffusion of hydrogen due to high pressured storage tanks failure[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22:265-270.
[15]蒋代,华敏,潘旭海.危化品储罐区多灾种耦合效应风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(9):144-150. JIANG Dai,HUA Min,PAN Xuhai.Risk analysis on multi-disaster coupling effect in storage tank area of dangerous chemicals[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2018,14(9):144-150.

相似文献/References:

[1]闫家伟,宋文华,董影超,等.液化天然气储罐火灾爆炸事故的定量分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):88.
 YAN Jia-wei SONG Wen-hua DONG Ying-chao XIE Fei,The quantitative analysis of LNG tanks’s fire and explosion accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):88.
[2]刘昕亮,谢飞,董影超,等.液化石油气站储罐区火灾爆炸危险性分析与安全措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):178.
 LIU Xin-liang,XIE Fei,DONG Ying-chao,et al.Hazard analysis and safety measures of fire and explosion in the area of liquefied petroleum gas storage tank[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):178.
[3]沈一洲,朱国庆,黄丽丽,等.黄磷储罐火灾临界安全距离理论分析与数值模拟[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):27.
 SHEN Yi-zhou,ZHU Guo-qing,HUANG Li-li,et al.The Theory Analysis and Numerical Simulation on Critical Safety Distance of Yellow Phosphorus Tanks Fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):27.
[4]张启波,袁凤丽,王清.硫酸储罐爆炸事故分析及预防[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(2):185.
 ZHANG Qi bo,YUAN Feng li,WANG Qing.Analysis and prevention on explosion accident of sulfuric acid tanks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(5):185.
[5]毕晓蕾,刘全桢,刘宝全,等.罐区灯塔雷击电磁辐射对储罐的危害研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):101.
 BI Xiao lei,LIU Quan zhen,LIU Bao quan,et al.Research on electromagnetic radiation harm to tank by light tower lightning stroke in Tank Farm[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(5):101.
[6]魏利军,王向阳,罗艾民,等.基于Probit-Bayes方法的储罐地震易损性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):17.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.003]
 WEI Lijun,WANG Xiangyang,LUO Aimin,et al.Investigation on seismic vulnerability of storage tanks based on Probit-Bayes method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):17.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.003]
[7]刘婉莹,侯磊,伍星光,等.基于VR技术的大型储罐火灾爆炸仿真软件设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(4):167.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.026]
 LIU Wanying,HOU Lei,WU Xingguang,et al.Design of simulation software for fire and explosion of largescale storage tank based on VR technology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(5):167.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.04.026]
[8]岑康,李欢,王泳龙,等.LNG加气站槽车卸车直供过程泄漏后果分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(4):77.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.04.013]
 CEN Kang,LI Huan,WANG Yonglong,et al.Quantitative analysis on leakage consequences during unloading and direct refueling process of tank truck at LNG refueling station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(5):77.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.04.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2024-03-29
* 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(52274184)
作者简介: 张光伟,博士研究生,主要研究方向为危险化学品事故泄漏和人员暴露评估。
通信作者: 刘晓平,博士,教授,主要研究方向为建筑室内外环境、危险化学品泄漏、扩散安全和建筑火灾。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-30