|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]田青芸,马东辉,王威.地震作用下建筑物上部楼层倾倒模式安全距离研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(9):17-24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.003]
 TIAN Qing-yun,MA Dong-hui,WANG Wei.Study on safety distance of upper structure toppling for buildings under earthquake[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(9):17-24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.003]
点击复制

地震作用下建筑物上部楼层倾倒模式安全距离研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年9期
页码:
17-24
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2014-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on safety distance of upper structure toppling for buildings under earthquake
作者:
田青芸1 马东辉12王威12
(1. 北京工业大学 抗震减灾研究所,北京 100124;2.北京工业大学 建筑与城市规划学院,北京 100124)
Author(s):
TIAN Qing-yun1 MA Dong-hui12WANG Wei12
(1.Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;  2. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)
关键词:
地震上部楼层倾倒安全距离简化公式简化计算表
Keywords:
earthquake upper structure toppling safety distance simplified formula simplified calculation table
分类号:
:X928.9; X43;P333
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根据地震作用下建筑物上部楼层倾倒时的破坏特点及理论分析,提出建筑物上部楼层倾倒时的倒塌模型。针对此模型进行受力分析及动力学分析,从而推导上部楼层倾倒模式下安全距离计算公式,并采用数据拟合的方法进行简化,得出建筑物倒塌破坏安全距离简化计算表,以便于震后应急道路有效宽度的规划控制。研究表明,简化公式值与理论值最大相对误差为4.38%,平均相对误差为0.76%,均在误差允许范围内。同时,推导出的理论公式与简化公式高度相关,相关系数为0.9999。研究结果可为实际地震中计算建筑物倒塌安全距离提供理论依据,可用于规划分析。
Abstract:
According to the destruction characteristics and theoretical analysis of upper structure toppling for buildings under earthquake, the collapse model of upper structure toppling for buildings was suggested. Based on force analysis and dynamic analysis on this model, the formula for safety distance of collapsed buildings was deduced, and the simplified formula was provided through data fitting method. In order to convenience the planning control on effective width of emergency road after earthquake, the simplified calculation table of safety distance of collapse buildings was provided. It showed that the maximum relative error between simplified formula value and theoretical value is 4.38% and the average relative error is 0.76%, which are within permission. At the same time, the correlation coefficient is 0.9999, which shows that the simplified formula is highly correlated with theoretical formula. So it can provide theoretical basis for the calculation of safety distance for collapsed buildings under practical earthquake, and it is available to planning control.

参考文献/References:

[1]Ellingwood B R.M itigating risk from abnormal load sand progressive collapse[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2006, 20(4):315-323
[2]United States General Services Administration(GSA). GSA 2003. progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization project[S]. Washington, D. C:UnitedStatesGeneral Services Administration,2003
[3]李易, 陆新征, 叶列平,等. 基于Pushdown分析的RC框架抗连续倒塌承载力研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 27(1): 10-18 LI Yi, LU Xin-zheng, YE Lie-ping, et al. Study on progressive-collapse resistance capacity of RC frame structures based on pushdown analysis[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 2011, 27(1): 10-18
[4]刘海卿,侯少颖. 地震作用下剪力墙结构倒塌破坏机理及仿真技术应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2008, 8(10): 2647-2652 LIU Hai-qing, HOU Shao-ying. Failure mechanism of the collapse and application for the simulation technology of shear wall structure under the earthquake [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2008, 8(10): 2647-2652
[5]伍敏. 高层建筑结构地震损伤与倒塌分析[D]. 天津:天津大学博士学位论文, 2012 WU Min. Damage and collapse analysis of tall building structures under seismic excitations[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2012
[6]秦东, 范立础. 钢筋混凝土结构倒塌全过程数值模拟[J]. 同济大学学报, 2001, 29(1):80-83 QIN Dong, FAN Li-chu. Numerical simulation on collapse process of reinforced concrete structures [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2001, 29(1):80-83
[7]袁景, 刘海卿, 刘东. 强震作用下钢筋混凝土框架结构倒塌破坏的三维仿真分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2010, 30(增): 115-119 YUAN Jing, LIU Hai-qing, LIU Dong. Three-dimensional simulation of collapse of reinforced concrete frame structure under major earthquake[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2010, 30(sup): 115-119
[8]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50011-2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010
[9]李军. 钢筋混凝土结构控制爆破拆除倒塌计算机模拟[D].武汉: 武汉科技大学硕士学位论文, 2007 LI Jun. Computer simulation for collapsing course for reinforced concrete structure with controlled blasting[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2007
[10]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. JGJ 3-2010高层建筑混凝土结构技术规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010第10卷第9期2014年9月中 国 安 全 生 产 科 学 技 术Journal of Safety Science and TechnologyVol.10 No.9Sep. 2014文章编号: 1673-193X(2014)-09-0025-05

相似文献/References:

[1]李稳哲,王辉,赵法锁,等.高压输电线铁塔地震时程弹性数值模拟[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):35.
 LI Wen zhe,WANG Hui,ZHAO Fa suo,et al.Numerical simulation on seismic timehistory elastane of highvoltage transmission tower[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(9):35.
[2]蔡嗣经,张栋,吴宗之.尾矿库地震溃坝模糊风险评估方法探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):10.
 CAI Shi Jing,ZHANG Dong,WU Zong Zhi.Discussion on Tailings Reservoir Dam fuzzy risk assessment model Under Seismic Conditions[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(9):10.
[3]谢红梅,赵江平,宋倩文.化工企业地震次生泄漏事故应急及无害化处理[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):134.
 XIE Hong-mei,ZHAO Jiang-ping,SONG Qian-wen.Emergency measures and harmless treatment of secondary leakage on chemical enterprises in the earthquake[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(9):134.
[4]张栋,吴宗之,蔡嗣经.尾矿库地震液化机理及抗震评估指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(6):17.
 ZHANG Dong,WU Zong-zhi,CAI Shi-jing.Discussion on tailings reservoir dam failure risk assessment index system under seismic conditions[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(9):17.
[5]顾一波,霍宇芒.基于贝叶斯网络的地震次生燃气管道泄漏事件链构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(7):134.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.07.024]
 GU Yibo,HUO Yumang.Construction of event chain for secondary gas pipeline leakage induced by earthquake based on Bayesian network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(9):134.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.07.024]
[6]娄亚龙,刘永,李向阳,等.某铀尾矿库地震和渗流耦合作用下稳定性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(5):79.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.013]
 LOU Yalong,LIU Yong,LI Xiangyang,et al.Study on stability of a certain uranium tailings under coupling effect of earthquake and seepage[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(9):79.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.013]
[7]魏利军,王向阳,罗艾民,等.基于Probit-Bayes方法的储罐地震易损性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):17.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.003]
 WEI Lijun,WANG Xiangyang,LUO Aimin,et al.Investigation on seismic vulnerability of storage tanks based on Probit-Bayes method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(9):17.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.003]
[8]张鹏,王艺环,秦国晋.非随机过程的地震激励下埋地压力管道的非概率可靠性分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(6):134.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.021]
 ZHANG Peng,WANG Yihuan,QIN Guojin.Non-probabilistic reliability analysis of buried pressure pipeline under non-random process earthquake excitation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(9):134.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.021]
[9]张炜超,郭安宁,孙昱,等.现阶段我国地震应急技术框架分析及评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(11):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.11.017]
 ZHANG Weichao,GUO Anning,SUN Yu,et al.Analysis and evaluation of earthquake emergency technology framework at present stage in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(9):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.11.017]
[10]陈长坤,谢明峰,雷鹏,等.地震震后埋压人员伤情程度分级研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(1):182.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.01.030]
 CHEN Changkun,XIE Mingfeng,LEI Peng,et al.Research on grading for injury degree of buried personnel after earthquake[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(9):182.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.01.030]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题(2011BAJ08B05); 国家自然科学基金项目(51208017); 北京工业大学博士科研启动基金项目(012000543114515)
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-09-30