|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]吕伏,梁冰,王岩,等.基于因子分析的开采层瓦斯抽采方法选择[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(7):26-31.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.005]
　LV Fu,LIANG Bing,WANG Yan,et al.The choice of mining gas extraction method based on the factor analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(7):26-31.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.005]
点击复制

基于因子分析的开采层瓦斯抽采方法选择
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年7期
页码:
26-31
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2014-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
The choice of mining gas extraction method based on the factor analysis
作者:
吕伏1; 梁冰2; 王岩3; 孙维吉2
（1.辽宁工程技术大学 基础教学部, 辽宁 葫芦岛 125105 ；2.辽宁工程技术大学 研究生学院，辽宁 阜新 123000；〖JP〗 3. 煤炭科学研究总院 沈阳研究院，辽宁 沈阳 110016
Author(s):
LV Fu 1;  LIANG Bing 2; WANG Yan3; SUN Wei-ji2
(1. Department of Basic Teaching,Liaoning Technical University, Huludao Liaoning,125105,China;  2. Graduate School,Liaoning Technical University,Fuxin Liaoning,123000,China; 3. Shenyang Research Institute,China Coal Research Institute,Shenyang Liaoning,110016,China)
关键词:
因子分析; 抽放难易程度; 煤与瓦斯突出; 开采层; 瓦斯抽采方法
Keywords:
factor analysis;  drainage degree of difficulty;  coal and gas outburst;  mining layer;  gas extraction method
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于煤与瓦斯的七个基本参数，应用因子分析方法，得到了反应本煤层抽放难易程度、突出危险性及瓦斯涌出量（不考虑邻近层影响）的三个因子。依据因子得分对开采层瓦斯抽放难易程度及煤与瓦斯突出危险性进行了分类，进而对开采层瓦斯预抽方法进行判断。结果表明，采用因子分析的方法进行开采层瓦斯预抽方法的选择与现场抽放设计基本一致，并且对于传统方法无法分类的情况也给出了合理的分类判断。采用该方法可以较客观、合理的选 择开采层瓦斯抽采方法。
Abstract:
Based on the seven coal and gas basic parameters，gets the three factors of coal seam drainage ease, outburst dangerous and gas emission (don't consider adjacent layer )by using the factor analysis method. Coal seam drainage ease and outburst dangerous are classified according to the factor score, then judge the mining layer gas extraction method. The results show that the factor analysis method is according to the field drainage design,and give out reasonable judgment of the classification which can’t be judged by the traditional method.Using this method can gets a more objective and reasonable choice of mining gas extraction method .

参考文献/References:

[1]王魁军,张兴华. 中国煤矿瓦斯抽采技术发展现状与前景［J］. 中国煤层气,2006,3(1):13-16, 39 WANG Kuijun,ZHANG Xinghua. Current status and prospects of CMM drainage technologies in China［J］. China Coalbed Methane,2006,3(1):13-16, 39
[2］曹树刚,徐阿猛,刘延保,等. 基于灰色关联分析的煤矿安全综合评价［J］. 采矿与安全工程学报,2007,24(2):141-145 CAO Shugang,XU Ameng,LIU Yanbao, et al. Comprehensive assessment of security in coal mines based on grey relevance analysis［J］. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2007,24(2):141-145
[3］袁亮. 瓦斯治理理念和煤与瓦斯共采技术［J］. 中国煤炭,2010,36(6):5-12 YUAN Liang. Concept of gas control and simultaneous extraction of coal and gas［J］. China Coal,2010,36(6):5-12
[4］王家臣. 煤与瓦斯共采需解决的关键理论问题与研究现状［J］. 煤炭工程,2011,(1):1-3, 0, 2
[5］程远平,俞启香,袁亮,等. 煤与远程卸压瓦斯安全高效共采试验研究［J］. 中国矿业大学学报,2004,33(2):132-136 CHENG Yuanping,YU Qi-xiang,YUAN Liang, et al. Experimental research of safe and HighEfficient exploitation of coal and pressure relief gas in long distance［J］. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2004,33(2):132-136
[6］周博潇,朱红青,张彬. 基于瓦斯涌出分源预测选择瓦斯抽放方法的研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2006,2(3):19-22 ZHOU Bo-xiao,ZHU Gong-qing,ZHANG Bin. Study on choice of gas drainage method based on differentsource gas emission prediction of working face［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2006,2(3):19-22
[7］王魁军. 矿井瓦斯防治技术优选瓦斯涌出量预测与抽放［M］ .徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2008:80-152
[8］郭德勇,李念友,裴大文,等. 煤与瓦斯突出预测灰色理论神经网络方法［J］. 北京科技大学学报,2007,29(4):354-357 GUO De-yong,LI Nian-you,PEI Da-wen, et al. Prediction method of coal and gas outburst using the grey theory and neural network［J］. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing,2007,29(4):354-357
[9］梁冰,秦冰,孙维吉. 基于灰靶决策模型的煤与瓦斯突出可能性评价［J］. 煤炭学报,2011,36(12):1974-1978 LIANG Bing,QIN Bing,SUN Weiji. Possibility assessment of coalgas outburst based on grey target model［J］. Journal of China Coal Society,2011,36(12):1974-1978
[10］王超,宋大钊,杜学胜,等. 煤与瓦斯突出预测的距离判别分析法及应用［J］. 采矿与安全工程学报,2009,26(4):470-474 WANG Chao,SONG Da-zhao,DU Xue-sheng, et al. Prediction of coal and gas outburst based on distance discriminant analysis method and its application［J］. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering,2009,26(4):470-474
[11］李运强.煤层潜在突出危险性评价技术的研究［D］. 北京：中国地质大学,2006
[12］胡新成,杨胜强,周秀红,等. 可拓学在煤层瓦斯抽放难易程度评价中的应用［J］. 煤炭科学技术,2011,39(10):69-71 HU Xincheng,YANG Shengjiang,ZHOU Xiugong, et al. Application of extenics to difficult degree evaluation of seam gas drainage［J］. Coal Science and Technology,2011,39(10):69-71
[13］张尧庭,方开泰. 多元统计分析引论［M］ .武汉:武汉大学出版社,2013:302-340
[14］谢中华. MATLAB统计分析与应用:40个案例分析［M］ .北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2010:374-391
[15］吕伏,梁冰,孙维吉,等. 基于主成分回归分析法的回采工作面瓦斯涌出量预测［J］. 煤炭学报,2012,37(1):113-116 LV Fu,LIANG Bing,SUN Wei-ji, et al. Gas emission quantity prediction of working face based on principal component regression analysis method［J］. Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(1):113-116

相似文献/References:

[1]徐吉辉,姜帆,张亮.基于SEFA的现役装备改进风险评价指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):53.
　XU Ji hui,JIANG Fan,ZHANG Liang.Research on evaluation index system of active equipment improvement risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(7):53.
[2]李孟杰,孙瑞山.基于认知可靠性的飞行差错影响因素体系的构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(12):148.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.12.025]
　LI Meng-jie,SUN Rui-shan.Establishment of impact factor system for flight error based on cognitive reliability[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(7):148.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.12.025]
[3]王瑞文,帅传敏,李文静.基于DEA的海外石油钻探项目HSE管理能力评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.031]
　WANG Ruiwen,SHUAI Chuanmin,LI Wenjing.Assessment of HSE management ability on overseas oil drilling project based on DEA approach[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(7):186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.031]
[4]司鹄,贾文梅.城市公共安全风险评估指标敏感性分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(11):71.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.012]
　SI Hu,JIA Wen-mei.Analysis on sensitivity of indexes for risk assessment on urban public safety[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(7):71.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.012]
[5]温廷新,孙红娟,张波,等.煤与瓦斯突出预测的QGA-LSSVM模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(5):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.001]
　WEN Ting-xin,SUN Hong-juan,ZHANG Bo,et al.Prediction model for outburst of coal and gas based on QGA-LSSVM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(7):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.001]
[6]王亦虹,刘飞,黄路路.建筑施工企业安全氛围量表初步开发—基于天津市建筑施工企业样本的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(5):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.031]
　WANG YI-hong,LIU Fei,HUANG Lu-lu.Preliminary development on scale of safety climate for construction enterprises in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(7):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.031]
[7]陈伟珂,张崑.人因视角下地铁施工管理环境因子识别的研[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(11):174.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.11.029]
　CHEN Wei-ke,ZHANG Kun.Study on identification for management environmental factors of subway construction from the perspective of human factor[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(7):174.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.11.029]
[8]袁轩,江新,袁国常.地下洞室群现场作业风险分析与向量模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(1):174.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.029]
　YUAN Xuan,JIANG Xin,YUAN Guochang.Risk analysis and vector model of field operation in underground cavern group[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(7):174.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.029]
[9]王永刚,刘吉祥.民航飞行员非技术技能评价模型的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(10):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.10.031]
　WANG Yonggang,LIU Jixiang.Research on evaluation model of non-technical skills for civil aviation pilots[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(7):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.10.031]
[10]王永刚,苏明清.基于因子分析与突变级数法的飞行安全状态评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]
　WANG Yonggang,SU Mingqing.Research on evaluation of flight safety situation based on factor analysis and catastrophe progression method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(7):187.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.028]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973）项目（2011CB201206）； 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（51304108）
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-07-30