|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]廖柯熹,杨艺,白国红,等.输气站场ESD系统的SIL定级与验证[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(1):161-165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.01.027]
　LIAO Ke-xi,YANG Yi,BAI Guo-hong,et al.Grading and validation of SIL in ESD system of gas station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(1):161-165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.01.027]
点击复制

输气站场ESD系统的SIL定级与验证
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年1期
页码:
161-165
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2015-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Grading and validation of SIL in ESD system of gas station
作者:
廖柯熹1; 杨艺1; 白国红2; 邓彦婕3
（1.西南石油大学 石油与天然气工程学院，四川 成都61050；2.青海油田采油一厂，青海 格尔木816000； 3. 中煤科工集团重庆设计研究院有限公司，重庆400039)
Author(s):
LIAO Ke-xi1;  YANG Yi1; BAI Guo-hong2;  DENG Yan-Jie3
(1. School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China; 2. NO.1 Oil Production Plant, Qinghai Oilfield, Geermu Qinghai 816000, China; 3. China Coal Technology & Engineering Group Chongqing Engineering Co.,Ltd.,
关键词:
输气站; SIL评估; 风险图; 故障树
Keywords:
gas station;  SIL evaluation;  risk graph;  fault tree
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.01.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对输气站场ESD系统配置的合理性，进行了SIL等级的确认与验证。选取了输气站下游爆管这一常见事故，基于风险图与故障树相结合的方法，对ESD系统进行安全功能分析。确定该安全功能所需的等级为SIL2，但现有配置只能达到SIL1的等级，不能满足安全功能的需求。对提高SIL等级的方法进行讨论，提出了具体的增加可靠性的方案。
Abstract:
Aiming at the rationality of ESD system configuration in gas station, the determination and verification of SIL grade were conducted. By selecting a common accident of pipeline explosion in downstream of gas station, based on the combined method of risk graph and fault tree, the safety function analysis was conducted on ESD system. The required grade of this safety function was determined to be SIL2, but the current configuration could only reach SIL1, which could not satisfy the requirement of safety function. The methods to improve SIL grade were discussed, and the specific plan to enhance reliability was proposed.

参考文献/References:

［1］王勇. 普光输气站场定量风险评价技术研究 ［D］. 四川: 西南石油大学, 2012
［2］沈学强, 白焰. 安全仪表系统的功能安全评估方法性能分析 ［J］. 化工自动化及仪表, 2012, 39(6):703-706 SHEN Xue-qiang, BAI Yan. Performance analysis of SIS functional safety assessment ［J］. Control and Instruments in Chemical Industry, 2012, 39(6):703-706
［3］郭海涛, 阳宪惠. 安全系统的安全完整性水平及其选择 ［J］. 化工自动化及仪表, 2006, 33(2):71-75 GUO Hai-tao, YANG Xian-hui. Safety integrity level of safety related system and its selection ［J］. Control and Instruments in Chemical Industry, 2006, 33(2):71-75
［4］IEC 61511, Functional Safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector［S］. 2003: 35-42
［5］黄会伟, 袁印实. 风险图表法安全完整性等级评价方［J］. 化工自动化及仪表, 2014, 41(2): 115-119 HUANG Hui-wei, YUAN Yin-shi. Risk graph method for safety integrity level evaluation ［J］. Control and Instruments in Chemical Industry, 2014, 41(2):115-119
［6］钱钧, 魏利军. 安全仪表系统等级划分与HAZOP分析的结合应用［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5(5):148-151 QIAN Jun, WEI Li-jun. Combined application of safety instrumented system classification and HAZOP analysis ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(5):148-151
［7］李娜, 孙文勇. HAZOP、LOPA和SIL方法的应用分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(5):103-106 LI Na, SUN Wen-yong. The application of HAZOP, LOPA and SIL analytical method［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(5):103-106

相似文献/References:

[1]李毅,熊亮,邓海发,等.SIL评估及HAZOP分析技术在海洋平台安全评估中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(8):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.022]
　LI Yi,XIONG Liang,DENG Hai fa,et al.Application of SIL evaluation and HAZOP analysis technology in safety assessment of offshore platform[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(1):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.022]
[2]孙艺博,刘佳玮,李威君.基于2GW-HAZOP与偏离度的输气站降压排污作业风险评估*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(3):97.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.03.015]
　SUN Yibo,LIU Jiawei,LI Weijun.Risk assessment on depressurization and sewage discharge operation in gas transmission stations based on 2GW-HAZOP and deviation degree[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(1):97.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.03.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-02-03