|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]段正肖,辛保泉,谭钦文,等.1种城市燃气管道风险评估模型及其应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(2):117-123.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.019]
　DUAN Zhengxiao,XIN Baoquan,TAN Qinwen,et al.A risk assessment model of urban gas pipeline and it’s application enlightenment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(2):117-123.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.019]
点击复制

1种城市燃气管道风险评估模型及其应用研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
16
期数:
2020年2期
页码:
117-123
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2020-02-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
A risk assessment model of urban gas pipeline and it’s application enlightenment
文章编号:
1673-193X(2020)-02-0117-07
作者:
段正肖; 辛保泉; 谭钦文; 鲁昆仑; 邓寅
（1.四川轻化工大学 化学与环境工程学院，四川 自贡 643000；
2.大连理工大学 化工学院，辽宁 大连 116024；3.西南科技大学 环境与资源学院，四川 绵阳 621010）
Author(s):
DUAN Zhengxiao;  XIN Baoquan;  TAN Qinwen;  LU Kunlun;  DENG Yin
(1.School of Chemistry and Environment,Sichuan University of Science & Engineering,Zigong Sichuan 643000,China;
2.College of Chemical Engineering,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian Liaoning 116024,China;3.School of Environment and Resource,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang Sichuan 621010,China)
关键词:
城市燃气管道; 风险评估; 可接受风险标准; 公众风险感知; 风险类别
Keywords:
urban gas pipeline;  risk assessment;  acceptable risk criteria;  public risk perception;  risk category
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为科学评估燃气管道在复杂且敏感的城市环境中个人风险可接受情况，促进城市和谐稳定。以燃气管道泄漏射流火灾为事故场景，在常规评估基础上结合管道地区特点，构建基于公众可接受伤亡风险标准的评估模型，并通过案例分析，开展城市燃气管道个人风险定量评估研究。结果表明：我国城市燃气管道个人死亡风险、个人受伤风险可接受标准的建议值分别为5.00×10-6和2.74×10-5，其在一般情况下的公众可接受风险标准建议值范围为5.00×10-7~5.50×10-5和2.74×10-6~4.11×10-4；公众的伤亡风险感知偏差将直接影响风险评估结果，及时有效地对目标群体进行风险疏导以改善其风险认知，有助于避免公众风险感知偏差引发的负面社会效应。
Abstract:
In order to scientifically assess the acceptability of individual risk for the gas pipelines in the complex and sensitive urban environment,and promote the harmony and stability of city,taking the jet fire caused by the leakage of gas pipeline as the accident scene,an assessment model based on the public acceptable risk criteria of casualties was constructed on the basis of conventional assessment combining with the regional characteristics of pipeline.The quantitative assessment research of individual risk for the urban gas pipeline was conducted through the case application and analysis.The results showed that the recommended values for the acceptable criteria of individual death risk and individual injury risk for the urban gas pipelines in China were 5.00×10-6 and 2.74×10-5,and the ranges of recommended values for the public acceptable risk criteria under general conditions were 5.00×10-7-5.50×10-5 and 2.74×10-6-4.11×10-4.The public risk perception deviation of casualties would directly affect the results of risk assessment.Carrying out the risk counseling on the target groups timely and effectively to improve their risk perception would help to avoid the negative social effect caused by the public risk perception deviation.

参考文献/References:

［1］SKOGDALEN J E,VINNEM J E.Combining precursor incidents investigations and QRA in oil and gas industry［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2012,101:48-58.
［2］魏亚荣,李长俊,吴瑕.基于贝叶斯网络的页岩气集输管道失效概率计算方法研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2019,15(1):121-127. WEI Yarong,LI Changjun,WU Xia.Study on calculation method of failure probability for gathering pipelines of shale gas based on bayesian network［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2019,15(1):121-127.
［3］RUSSO P,PARISI F.Risk-targeted safety distance of reinforced concrete buildings from natural-gas transmissionpipelines［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2016,148:57-66.
［4］GONG Y H,NIU Z Y,BAI T Y.Societal risk acceptance criteria for gas distribution pipelines based on incident data from the United States［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2020,63:1-8.
［5］张鹏,秦国晋,王艺环.城市燃气事故生命损失风险可接受标准研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2018,14(8):181-186. ZHANG Peng,QIN Guojin,WANG Yihuan.Study on acceptable criteria for life loss risk of urban gas accidents［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2018,14(8):181-186.
［6］HAN Z Y,WENG W G.Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,189(1-2):509-518.
［7］黄维和,郑洪龙,吴忠良.管道完整性管理在中国应用10年回顾与展望［J］.天燃气工业，2013,33(12):1-5. HUANG Weihe,ZHENG Honglong,WU Zhongliang.Overview of pipeline integrity management application over the past decade and its prospect in future in china.［J］.Natural Gas Industry，2013,33(12):1-5.
［8］American Petroleum Institute(API).Risk based inspection technology:API 581［S］.American Petroleum Institute：American,september 2008.
［9］贾增科.城市燃气管道风险评价研究［D］.邯郸:河北工程大学,2008.
［10］林铭玉.燃气管网对土地利用规划的风险影响分析［D］.成都:西南石油大学,2010.
［11］姚安林,周立国,汪龙,等.天燃气长输管道地区等级升级管理与风险评价［J］.天燃气工业，2017,37(1):124-130. YAO Anli,ZHOU Liguo,WANG Long,et al.Management of and risk evaluation on long-distance gas pipelines related to regional level upgrading［J］.Natural Gas Industry，2017,37(1):124-130.
［12］张圣柱.油气长输管道事故风险分析与选线方法研究［D］.北京：中国矿业大学(北京),2012.
［13］李宝岩.可接受风险标准研究［D］.镇江:江苏大学,2010.
［14］FISCHHOFF B.Acceptable risk［M］.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1981.
［15］甘莅豪.大数据时代专家在舆论场中的公信力分析［J］.北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,21(4):181-188. GAN Lihao.Credibility analysis of experts in public opinion field in the era of big data［J］.Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2019,21(4):181-188.
［16］单克,帅健,张思弘.基于修正因子的油气管道失效概率评估［J］.中国安全科学学报，2016,26(1):87-93. SHAN Ke,SHUAI Jian,ZHANG Sihong.Adjustment factors based assessment of oil and gas pipelines failure probability［J］.China Safety Science Journal，2016,26(1):87-93.
［17］曾小红.危险化学品泄漏事故风险评估模型及应用研究［D］.重庆:重庆大学,2011.
［18］BAJCAR T,CIMERMAN F,IROK B.Model for quantitative risk assessment on naturally ventilated metering-regulation stations for natural gas［J］.Safety Science,2014,64:50-59.
［19］毛小虎,郝永梅,邢志祥,等.城市天然气管道动态泄漏扩散特性模拟分析［J］.油气储运,2014,33(4):374-379. MAO Xiaohu,HAO Yongmei,XING Zhixiang,et al.Simulation of dynamic leakage and diffusion characteristics of urban gas pipelines［J］.Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2014,33(4):374-379.

相似文献/References:

[1]林志忠.航运企业风险评估的实施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):156.
　LIN Zhi-zhong.The risk assessment of shipping company[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):156.
[2]张玉龙.施工现场的风险管理应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):145.
　ZHANG Yu-long.Research on risk management application of construction site[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(2):145.
[3]牛康.地铁盾构施工风险评估与风险规避研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):42.
　NIU Kang.Study on risk assessment and avoiding of metro shielding construction[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):42.
[4]王磊,陈东琼,李绪丰,等.基于RBI的碳五石油树脂装置风险评估分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):112.
　WANG Lei,CHEN Dong-qiong,LI Xu-feng,et al.Risk Assessment on C_5 Petroleum Resin Plant Based on RBI Technology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):112.
[5]贾筱莹.基于模糊综合评价法的继电保护人员安全状态评估及应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):170.
　JIA Xiao-ying.Safety Assessment of Relay Protection Staff Based on Fuzzy Synthesis Evaluation and Its Application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):170.
[6]尤秋菊,樊建春,朱伟,等.北京市燃气事故风险评估与控制对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):93.
　YOU Qiu-ju,FAN Jian-chun,ZHU Wei,et al.Risk assessment and control measures of gas accident?in Beijing[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):93.
[7]刘文军,李靖,鞠红霞.化工厂雷击灾害风险评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):146.
　LIU Wen jun,LI Jing,JU Hong xia.Risk assessment of lightning struck meteorological disaster for a chemical factory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):146.
[8]王孔森.基于层次分析方法的核电火灾风险评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(6):110.
　WANG Kong sen.Fire risk evaluation on nuclear power plant based onthe method of analytic hierarchy process[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):110.
[9]刘小勇,沈〓立,孙明义.桥梁工程规划设计阶段施工安全风险评估的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):79.
　LIU Xiao yong,SHEN Li,SUN Ming yi.Research on the construction safety risk assessment in the planning  and design stages of bridge engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):79.
[10]张洪梅,李俊荣,尹立华,等.石油天然气钻井工程风险量化技术[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):127.
　ZHANG Hong mei,LI Jun rong,YIN Li hua,et al.Risk quantitative technology of oil and gas drilling engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):127.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2019-11-22
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（51604057）
作者简介： 段正肖，硕士，助教，主要研究方向为可接受风险与定量评估。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-16