|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王林元,吕瑞琪,邓洪波.不同粒径镁铝合金粉尘爆炸与抑爆特性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(1):34-38.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.006]
 WANG Linyuan,LYU Ruiqi,DENG Hongbo.Study on characteristics of explosion and explosion suppression for Magnesium-Aluminum alloy dust with different particle size[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(1):34-38.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.006]
点击复制

不同粒径镁铝合金粉尘爆炸与抑爆特性研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
13
期数:
2017年1期
页码:
34-38
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2017-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on characteristics of explosion and explosion suppression for Magnesium-Aluminum alloy dust with different particle size
文章编号:
1673-193X(2017)-01-0034-05
作者:
王林元吕瑞琪邓洪波
西南石油大学 化学化工学院,四川 成都 610500
Author(s):
WANG Linyuan LYU Ruiqi DENG Hongbo
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China
关键词:
安全工程镁铝合金粉爆炸下限粒径最大爆压惰性粉尘
Keywords:
safety engineering Magnesium-Aluminum alloy dust lower explosive limit particle size maximum explosive pressure inert dust
分类号:
X932
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究镁铝合金粉爆炸危险特性,利用20L球形爆炸容器进行测试,结果表明:180目 (80 μm)、 120目(125 μm) 和60目(250 μm)3种粒径下的金属粉尘爆炸下限浓度分别为45 g/m3,55 g/m3和95 g/m3。相同浓度下最大爆炸压力随粒径增大的而减小。以碳化硅和石墨为代表的研究中,60目,120目和180目的镁铝合金粉以10%的浓度梯度加入碳化硅浓度分别至50%,70%和80%,石墨浓度至30%,50%和60%时,镁铝合金粉不会发生爆炸。表明碳化硅及石墨等惰性粉尘都能对粉尘爆炸有抑制作用,其中石墨对镁铝合金粉的抑爆作用明显优于碳化硅。
Abstract:
To study the explosion hazard characteristics of Magnesium-Aluminum alloy dust, a 20L spherical explosion experimental apparatus was used to carry out the tests. The results showed that the lower explosive limit concentration of metal dust with three particle size of 180 mesh (80μm), 120 mesh (125μm) and 60 mesh (250μm) was 45g/m3, 55g/m3 and 95g/m3 respectively, and the maximum explosive pressure decreased with the increase of particle size under the same concentration. In the research with the silicon carbide and graphite as the representative, by adding the silicon carbide and graphite with a concentration gradient of 10% into the Magnesium-Aluminum alloy dust with the particle size of 180 mesh, 120 mesh and 60 mesh, when the concentration of silicon carbide was 50%, 70% and 80% respectively, and the concentration of graphite was 30%, 50% and 60% respectively, the explosion of Magnesium-Aluminum alloy dust did not occur. It showed that the inert dust such as silicon carbide and graphite have the inhibiting effect on the dust explosion, and the explosion suppression effect of graphite on Magnesium-Aluminum alloy dust is better than that of silicon carbide.

参考文献/References:

[1]I. Hartmann, J. Nagy, M. Jacobson. Recent Studies on the Explosibility of Cornstarch. US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1950.
[2]Wataru Ishihama, Heiji Enomoto. Experimental Study of the Explosion Characteristics of Metal Dust Clouds[J].Symposium (International)on Combustion, 1975, 15(1): 479- 487.
[3]Bidabadi M, Mohammadi M, Poorfar A K, et al. Modeling Combustionof Aluminum Dust Cloud in Media with Spatially Discrete Sources[J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 51(6): 837-845.
[4]Bidabadi M, Poorfar A K, Wang S B, et al. A Comparative Study of Different Burning Time Models for the Combustion of Aluminum Dust Particles[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 105(SI): 474-482.
[5]P. E. Moore, R. M. Freehill. Dust Explosion Protection-the Choices[C]. Proceedings of The 6th International Colloquium on Dust Explosions, Shenyang, PRC, Aug 29th-Sep 2nd, 1994.
[6]范宝春,谢波,张小和,等. 惰性粉尘抑爆过程中的实验研究[J]. 流体力学实验与测量, 2001,15(4): 20-25. FAN Baochun, XIE Bo, ZHANG Xiaohe, et al. Experimental research on explosion suppression by inert particles[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 2001,15(4): 20-25.
[7]游天龙. 钛金属粉尘关键爆炸参数测试研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2015:10-39.
[8]钟英鹏. 镁粉爆炸特性实验研究及其危险性评价[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学,2008:4-5.
[9]李亚男. 磷酸二氢铵对金属粉尘的爆炸抑制研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2015: 31-41.
[10]Fan BC, Ding DM, Tang MJ. An aluminum dust explosion in a spherical closed vessel[A]. Proceedings of the 5th International Colloquium on Dust Explosions, Warsaw, Poland, Aug 21-31, 1993.
[11]Alexander Gromov, Vladimir Vereshchagin. Study of aluminum nitride formation by superfine aluminum powder combustion in air[J].Journal of the European Ceramic Society,2004,(24):2879-2884.
[12]中国煤炭工业协会. 粉尘云爆炸下限浓度测定方法:GB/T 16425-1996[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1997.
[13]陈玲. 铝粉爆炸特性的实验研究和模拟[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2011:39-41.
[14]马东阳, 张梅, 郭敏. 焙烧对铝土矿尾矿相转变,失重率及平均粒径与比表面积的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2014, 33(9): 2154-2157. MA Dongyang, ZHANG Mei, GUO Min. Effect of calcination to the mineral phase transformation, weight loss ratio, granularity and specific surface area of bauxite tailings [J]. Bulletin of Chinese Ceramic Society, 2014, 33(9): 2156-2157.
[15]王海福,冯顺山. 防爆学原理[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2004: 30-35.
[16]杜兵,蒯念生,黄卫星,等. 煤粉-惰性介质混合体系爆炸特性实验研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2012,44(S1):229-234. DU Bing, KUAI Niansheng, HUANG Weixing, et al. Experiment-based investigations on explosion behaviors of coal dust-inertant mixture[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2012,44(S1):229-234.
[17]付羽, 李刚, 陈宝智. 氯化钠粉末对镁粉爆炸猛度的影响研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009,5(4):7-8. FU Yu, LI Gang, CHEN Baozhi. Studies on the effect of sodium chloride dust on the violence of magnesium powder explosion[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2009,5(4) : 7-8.
[18]谢波.可燃系统中爆炸抑制过程的实验与理论研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2003:79-82.
[19]R. K. Eckhoff. Current status and expected future trends in dust explosion research[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2005,18:225-237.
[20]VDI 2263-1-1990, Dust Fires and Dust Explosions; Hazard-Assessment-Protective Measures; Test Method for the Determination of the Safety Characteristic of Dusts[S].
[21]赵衡阳. 炸药爆轰产物流场的分析及实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1983, 3(3): 20-24. ZHAO Hengyang. Analysis and experimental research of detonation product flow[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1983, 3(3): 20-24.
[22]秦政先.天然气管道泄漏扩散及爆炸数值模拟研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学,2007:66-70.

相似文献/References:

[1]张新梅,陈国明.安全工程专业本科毕业设计的全过程质量控制[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(1):112.
 ZHANG Xin-mei,CHEN Guo-ming.Whole process quality control of undergraduate graduation projection of safety engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):112.
[2]张景钢,张桂英.安全工程特色专业建设研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):151.
 ZHANG Jing gang,ZHANG Gui ying.Research on construction of safety engineering characteristic specialty[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):151.
[3]孙晓雷,杨英丽,牛金成.专业认证与安全工程本科教育[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):78.
 SUN Xiao-lei,YUANG Ying-li,NIU Jin-cheng.Study on professional accertification and safety engineering undergraduate education[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):78.
[4]张洪杰,向晓东,陈旺生.安全工程专业教学方法改革与创新型人才培养[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):172.
 ZHANG Hong-jie,XIANG Xiao-dong,CHEN Wang-sheng.Safety Engineering Teaching Methods Reform and Innovation Talents Training[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):172.
[5]魏连江,王德明,陈开岩.《矿井通风与安全》课程设计教学模式研究与改革[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):163.
 WEI Lian-jiang,WANG De-ming,CHEN Kai-yan.Teaching Research and Reform of Mine Ventilation and Safety Course Design[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):163.
[6]王桂芬,张宪立,阎卫东,等.建筑物火灾中人员行为EXODUS模拟的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):67.
 WANG Gui-fen,ZHANG Xian-li,YAN Wei-dong.Building fire behavior modeling of EXODUS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):67.
[7]侯海周,胡毅亭,卫延安.基于试验的工业雷管传输皮带殉爆距离的安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):93.
 HOU Hai-zhou,Hu Yi-ting,Wei Yan-an.Safety Assessment for Safety Distance of Propagation Blast of Transmission Belts of Industrial detonators Based on Experimental[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):93.
[8]刘鹏刚,杨振宏,杨宏刚,等.安全工程本科专业实习基地建设探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):186.
 Liu Peng-gang,Yang Zhen-hong,YangHong-gang,et al.The dilemma and solving ways of safety engineering practice base on large-scale engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):186.
[9]张树川,刘健.安全工程专业课程体系优化研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(4):195.
 ZHANG Shu chuan,LIU Jian.Study on optimization of safety engineering course system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):195.
[10]王凯,李珊,潘侠,等.我国安全工程专业高等教育发展现状分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):169.
 WANG Kai,LI Shan,PAN Xia,et al.Analysis on current situations of the development for higher education of safety engineering discipline in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):169.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(51474187);四川省安全监管局(四川煤监局)安全生产科技项目(scaqjgjc_stp_20150022);西南石油大学青年教师“学术过关”资助计划(200931010029);四川省油气消防重点实验室开放基金项目(YQXF201606)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-02