|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘清清,赵江平,刘冬华.基于DEA对抗交叉评价模型的化工园区脆弱性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):56-60.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.010]
 LIU Qingqing,ZHAO Jiangping,LIU Donghua.Assessment on vulnerability of chemical industrial park based on DEA aggressive-cross-evaluation model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):56-60.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.010]
点击复制

基于DEA对抗交叉评价模型的化工园区脆弱性评价
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年1期
页码:
56-60
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment on vulnerability of chemical industrial park based on DEA aggressive-cross-evaluation model
文章编号:
1673-193X(2016)-01-0056-05
作者:
刘清清赵江平刘冬华
(西安建筑科技大学 材料与矿资学院,陕西 西安 710055)
Author(s):
LIU Qingqing ZHAO Jiangping LIU Donghua
(School of Material Science and Mineral Information, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi′an Shanxi 710055, China)
关键词:
化工园区脆弱性评价数据包络分析法对抗交叉评价模型
Keywords:
chemical industry park vulnerability assessment DEA aggressive-cross-evaluation model
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
化工园区的脆弱性是评估园区安全现状的重要指标,采用DEA对抗交叉评价方法对某省5个化工园区的脆弱性进行了评价研究。首先从园区固有危险性、园区承灾体脆弱性以及事故后果损失程度3个方面构建了化工园区脆弱性评估指标体系,通过DEA对抗交叉评价模型得出的效率值对园区事故成灾效率进行了评估,成灾效率越大说明脆弱性越大,反之,脆弱性越小;最后,探讨了5个化工园区脆弱性等级,对其进行了优劣排序,分析了园区脆弱性的影响因素;可为化工园区的管理者提供理论支持。
Abstract:
The vulnerability of chemical industrial park is an important index for evaluating the present situation of safety. The DEA aggressive-cross-evaluation method was applied to evaluate the vulnerability of five chemical industry parks in some province. Firstly, an index system of vulnerability assessment for chemical industrial park was constructed from three aspects, including the inherent danger of chemical industry park, the vulnerability of hazard-affected body and accident consequence losses. Then, the efficiency of accident causing disaster in chemical industrial park was evaluated by efficiency value obtained from DEA aggressive-cross-evaluation model. The greater the efficiency of causing disaster, the greater the vulnerability, conversely, the smaller the vulnerability. Finally, the vulnerability levels of five chemical industrial parks were discussed, the sorting was conducted, and the influence factors of vulnerability were analyzed. It can provide theoretical support for managers of chemical industrial park.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘茂. 化工园区重大事故风险分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2011,31(1):68-73. LIU Mao. Risk analysis to major accident of chemical industry parks [J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Engineering,2011,31(1):68-73.
[2]刘铁民. 事故灾难成因再认识—脆弱性研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):5-10. LIU Tiemin. Recognition of disaster causes-study of the vulnerability[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2010,6(5):5-10.
[3]温宁,刘铁民. 基于对抗交叉评价模型的中国自然灾害区域脆弱性评价[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):24-28. WEN Ning,LIU Tiemin. The assessment of regional vulnerability to natural disasters in China by using the aggressive-cross-evaluation model[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(4):24-28.
[4]孙家森. 数据包络分析的交叉效率理论方法与应用研究[D]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学,2014.
[5]刘华军. 化工园区安全水平评价指标体系构建[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2006.
[6]张斌,赵前胜. 区域灾害体脆弱性指标与精细化模型研究[J]. 灾害学,2010,25(2):36-40. ZHANG Bin,ZHAO Qiansheng. Research of regional disaster vulnerability index and refinement model[J]. Science of disaster,2010,25(2):36-40.
[7]GB6944—2012,危险货物分类和品名编号[S].2012.
[8]GB18218—2009,重大危险源辨识[S].2009.
[9]GBZ230—2010,职业性接触毒物危害程度分级[S].2010.
[10]谭朝阳. 化工园区脆弱性综合评估方法研究[D]. 天津:南开大学,2012.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪卫国.基于安全规划要素表的化工园区安全规划研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):99.
 WANG Wei-guo.Research on safety planning for chemical industrial park based on elements table[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):99.
[2]叶青,陈国华,陈清光,等.基于监管的化工园区事故免疫系统构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):61.
 YE Qing,CHEN Guo-hua,CHEN Qing-guang,et al.Establishment of accident immunity system for chemical industry park based on supervision[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):61.
[3]李保良,赵东风,孟亦飞,等.化工园区安全准入理论框架探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):159.
 LI Bao-liang,ZHAO Dong-feng,MENG Yi-fei.Study on Security access of enterprises in chemical parks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):159.
[4]李保良,赵东风.化工园区综合风险评价中的公众参与研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(11):126.
 LI Bao-liang,ZHAO Dong-feng.Study on public participation in general risk assessment of chemical park[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):126.
[5]李久安,,彭小明,等.多功能闸门应急处理难溶性液态有机泄漏物性能[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):27.
[6]王雪梅,吴穹.化工园区企业安全相关性计算模型研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):112.
 WANG Xue mei,WU Qiong.Study on calculation model for safety correlation of enterprise in chemical industrial park[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(1):112.
[7]秦跃进,张辉,李芒,等.化工园区安全生产监管存在问题及对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):144.
 QIN Yue-jin,ZHANG Hui,LI Mang,et al.Study on the problems and countermeasures of the safety supervision and management of chemical industry parks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(1):144.
[8]彭鹏,赵东风.基于风险的化工园区企业准入框架分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(4):104.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.04.019]
 PENG Peng,ZHAO Dong feng.Study on access of enterprises in chemical parks based on risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(1):104.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.04.019]
[9]米红梅,张悦,宋占兵.基于VEGA和DCGA的化工园区布局优化研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(5):45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.05.009]
 MI Hong mei,ZHANG Yue,SONG Zhan bing.Study on layout optimization for chemical industry park based on VEGA and DCGA[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(1):45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.05.009]
[10]师立晨.化工园区安全容量辨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(7):60.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.07.010]
 SHI Li chen.Analysis on safety capacity of chemical industry park[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(1):60.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.07.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
陕西省教育厅专项基金项目(11JK0789)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-01