|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]汪伟忠,卢明银,张国宝,等.风险因素交互耦合下机加工车间安全评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):174-179.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.028]
　WANG Wei-zhong,LU Ming-yin,ZHANG Guo-bao,et al.Safety evaluation on machine workshop under interactive coupling of risk factors[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(12):174-179.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.028]
点击复制

风险因素交互耦合下机加工车间安全评估
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年12期
页码:
174-179
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2015-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Safety evaluation on machine workshop under interactive coupling of risk factors
文章编号:
1673-193X(2015)-12-0174-06
作者:
汪伟忠1; 卢明银2; 张国宝1; 程淑平1
(1.安徽科技学院 管理学院, 安徽 滁州 233100；2.中国矿业大学 矿业学院, 江苏 徐州 221116)
Author(s):
WANG Wei-zhong1;  LU Ming-yin2;  ZHANG Guo-bao1;  CHENG Shu-ping1
(1. School of Management, Anhui Science and Technology University, Chuzhou Anhui 233100, China; 2. School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China)
关键词:
车间; 安全评价; 风险耦合; 耦合度; 模型
Keywords:
workshop;  safety evaluation;  risk coupling;  coupling degree;  model
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了评价风险因子耦合作用下的机加工车间安全状况，构建了一种基于协调耦合理论的机加工车间安全评价模型。首先，从人员因子、设备因子、环境因子和管理因子4个维度要素分析机加工车间风险因子间的耦合作用机理；基于此，建立机加工车间安全评价指标体系；然后，构建耦合协调模型对多因素交互耦合下的机加工车间安全状况进行评价；最后，以安徽省某汽车机加工车间为例，对所建立的模型进行验证。结果表明，管理因子和人员因子对机加工车间的整体安全水平贡献最大，同时，车间整体安全状况良好，评价结果与实际情况基本相一致。
Abstract:
To evaluate the safety situation of machine workshop under the coupling effect of risk factors, a safety evaluation model of machine workshop based on coordinated coupling theory was established. Firstly, the coupling effect mechanism of risk factors in machining workshop was analyzed from four dimensional elements, including personnel factors, equipment factors, environment factors and management factors, therefore, an index system of safety evaluation on machine workshop was established. Secondly, a coupling coordinated model was constructed to evaluate the safety situation of machine workshop under the interactive coupling of multi factors. Finally, taking a certain automobile machine workshop in Anhui as example, the proposed model was verified. The results showed that the management factors and personnel factors had the greatest contribution on the overall safety level of machine workshop, the overall safety situation of workshop was good, and the evaluation result was basically consistent with the actual situation.

参考文献/References:

［1］M.Dadeviren, .Yüksel, M.Kurt. A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system［J］. Safety Science, 2008, 46(5): 771-783
［2］刘清,王冠雄.复杂水域船舶通航安全风险耦合机理分析［J］.武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2014,38(1):59-63 LIU Qing, WANG Guan-xiong. Complex waters of ship navigation safety risk coupling mechanism analysis［J］.Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2014, 38(1):59-63
［3］肖礼谆,马驷,甄利贤.高速铁路客运站风险分析研究［J］.铁道运输与经济,2015,36(9):57-62 XIAO Li-zhun, MA Si, ZHEN Li-xian. Study on risk analysis of high-speed railway passenger stations［J］.Railway Transport and Economy, 2015,36(9):57-62
［4］罗帆,刘小平,杨 智.基于系统动力学的空管安全风险情景预警决策模型仿真［J］.系统工程,2014,32(1):139-145 LU Fan, LIU Xiao-ping, YANG Zhi. Pre-warning decision-making model simulation of air traffic control safety risk based on system dynamics［J］.System Engineering, 2014,32(1):139-145
［5］李润求,施式亮,罗文柯.煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故特征与耦合规律研究［J］.中国安全科学学报,2010,20(2):69-74 LI Run-qiu, SHI Shi-liang, LUO Wen-ke. Research on cross-coupling characteristics and laws of gas explosion accidents in coal mines［J］.China Safety Science Journal, 2010,20(2):69-74
［6］刘全龙,李新春.煤矿瓦斯事故危险源分类及其耦合作用分析［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):164-168 LIU Quan-long, LI Xin-chun. Study on the classification and the coupling analysis of hazard source in coal gas accident［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012,8(9):164-168
［7］刘全龙,李新春,王雷.煤矿事故风险因子耦合作用分析及度量研究［J］.统计与信息论坛,2015,30(3):82-87 LIU Quan long, LI Xin chun, WANG Lei. Analysis and measurement of risk factors coupling in coal mine accidents［J］.Statistics & Information Fourum, 2015,30(3):82-87
［8］汪伟忠,张国宝,卢明银.多因素耦合的加工车间关键风险因素定量分析［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(9):158-164 WANG Wei-zhong, ZHANG Guo-bao, LU Ming-yin. Quantitative analysis on critical risk factors of processing workshop based on multiple-factor coupling［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015,11(9):158-164
［9］胡甚平,黎法明,席永涛,等.海上交通系统风险成因耦合机理仿真［J］.应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(2):409-419 HU Shen-ping, LI Fa-ming, XI Yong-tao, et al. Novel simulation on coupling mechanism of risk formation segments for marine traffic system［J］. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(2): 409-419
［10］张进春,吴超,侯锦秀,等. 生产车间安全管理状况的区间数模糊综合评价方法研究［J］.安全与环境学报,2006,6(2):135-138 ZHANG Jin-chun, WU Chao, HOU Jin-xiu, et al. Study on the fuzzy integrate evaluating method of interval number on the workshop safety management ［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2006, 6(2):135-138
［11］陈恒,徐睿姝,付振通.企业技术创新能力与知识管理能力耦合评价研究［J］.经济经纬,2014,31(1):101-106 CHEN Heng, XU Rui-shu, FU Zhen-tong. Research on the evaluation of coupling between technological innovation capabilities and knowledge management capabilities［J］.Economic Survey, 2014,31(1):101-106
［12］S. Visalakshmi, P. Lakshmi, M.S. Shama, et al. An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-TOPSIS approach for financial performance evaluation of GREENEX industries［J］. International Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 23(3):340-362

相似文献/References:

[1]汪送,王瑛,李超.BP神经网络在航空机务人员本质安全程度评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(6):35.
[2]段礼祥,张来斌,钱永梅.AHP—模糊综合评价法在离心泵安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):127.
　DUAN Li xiang,ZHANG Lai bin,QIAN Yong mei.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in safety assessme of centrifuge pumpnt[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):127.
[3]金珠,马小平.基于核校准和SVM的煤矿安全组织管理因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):16.
　JIN Zhu,MA Xiao-ping.Analysis of organizational administrative factors in coal mine safety based on kernel alignment and SVM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):16.
[4]陈杨,王为民,姜东方,等.基于故障树与灰色模糊理论的城市CNG加气站安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):123.
　Chen Yang,Wang Wei-min,JIANG Dong-fang,et al.Safety Assessment of the CNG station in city based on the Faulty Tree and Fuzzy-grey Theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):123.
[5]吕显智,马建云,陶昆,等.基于模糊综合评价法的高层宾馆消防安全现状评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):138.
　LV Xian-zhi,MA Jian-yun,TAO Kun,et al.Establish?of fire safety evaluation system for high-rise hotel using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):138.
[6]郭凯旋.PTA生产火灾爆炸危险性分析与评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):167.
　GUO Kai-xuan.Analysis and Assessment on Fire & Explosion Risk for PTA Production[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):167.
[7]朱劭涌,曹雄,刘磊,等.糠醛厂生产过程安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):118.
　ZHU Shao-yong,CAO Xiong,LIU Lei,et al.Safety Assessment on productive process in one furfural factory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):118.
[8]文华,钮英建.功能安全评估在安全评价中的应用体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):116.
　WEN Hua NIU Ying-jian.Research on the Application of Functional Safety Assessment to Safety Evaluation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):116.
[9]李曌,王金安.高速公路工程道路交通安全评价研究及工程应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):120.
　LI Zhao,WANG Jin-an.Study on evaluation of expressway traffic safety and engineering application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):120.
[10]谭东宁,于立友.关于在风电场安全评价中增加信息安全评价内容的建议[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):151.
　Tan Dongning,Yu Liyou.Suggestions on the information security evaluation content increased the safety evaluation of wind power farms[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):151.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
安徽省教育厅人文社科重大项目(SK2014 ZD022);安徽科技学院人才引进项目(SRC2014400,SRC2014402)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-25