[1]卢丹丹,宋文华,张桂钏,等.基于AHP-熵权法的石化企业承灾体脆弱性评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):180-185.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.029]
LU Dan-dan,SONG Wen-hua,ZHANG Gui-chuan,et al.Evaluation on vulnerability of hazard bearing body in petrochemical
enterprises based on AHP-entropy weight method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(12):180-185.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.029]
点击复制
基于AHP-熵权法的石化企业承灾体脆弱性评估
LU Dan-dan,SONG Wen-hua,ZHANG Gui-chuan,et al.Evaluation on vulnerability of hazard bearing body in petrochemical enterprises based on AHP-entropy weight method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(12):180-185.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.029]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 11
- 期数:
- 2015年12期
- 页码:
- 180-185
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2015-12-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Evaluation on vulnerability of hazard bearing body in petrochemical enterprises based on AHP-entropy weight method
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2015)-12-0180-06
- 关键词:
- 承灾体; 脆弱性指标评估体系; AHP-熵权法; Kendall协和系数; 模糊综合评价
- Keywords:
- hazard bearing body; vulnerability index evaluation system; AHP-entropy weight method; Kendall's coefficient of concordance; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
- 分类号:
- X921
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 针对石化企业化工事故引发的区域脆弱性研究不足现状，构建脆弱性评估模式。该模式以石化企业承灾体常见事故类型分析为基础构建脆弱性评估指标体系，集成层次分析法和熵权法确定权重并引入多变量Kendall协和系数检验一致性，在此基础上运用模糊综合评价法评估其脆弱性等级。将该模式应用于某石化企业，得到企业内不同区域的脆弱性等级分布。案例应用表明：AHP-熵权法应用于确定指标权重能更好的综合主客观因素的影响，评估结果可指导企业采取事故控制和灾害预防措施，更好的控制区域风险。
- Abstract:
- In view of the present situation that the research on regional vulnerability caused by chemical accidents in petrochemical enterprises has been inadequate, a vulnerability evaluation mode was established. In this mode, the index system of vulnerability evaluation was constructed based on the analysis of common accident types for hazard bearing body in petrochemical enterprises. The weights were determined by combining analytic hierarchy process method with entropy weight method, and the Kendall's coefficient of concordance with multi variable was introduced to test the consistency. On this basis, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the vulnerability grade. This mode was applied in a certain petrochemical enterprise, and the distribution of vulnerability grades in different regions of the enterprise was obtained. The case application showed that when applying the AHP-entropy weight method to determine the index weights, the influence of subjective and objective factors can be better integrated, and the evaluation results can guide the enterprises to adopt accident control and disaster prevention measures to better control the regional risk.
参考文献/References:
［1］赵东风,胡苏,安聪,等. 化工行业承灾体脆弱性指标体系的构建［J］. 当代化工,2014(8):1602-1605，1615
ZHAO Dong-feng, HU Su, AN Cong, et al.Chemical industry bearing disaster vulnerability index system construction［J］. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2014(8):1602-1605，1615
［2］刘铁民,徐永莉,王浩. 重特大事故频发凸显生产安全的系统脆弱性-2013年几起特大事故反思［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):5-12
LIU Tie-min, XU Yong-li, WANG Hao. Heavy and serious accidents occurred frequently in the production safety of the system vulnerability—a few cases of serious accidents in 2013［J］. Journal of Safety Scenice and Technology,2014,10(4):5-12
［3］张斌,赵前胜,姜瑜君. 区域承灾体脆弱性指标体系与精细量化模型研究［J］. 灾害学,2010(2):36-40
ZHANG Bin, ZHAO Qian-sheng, JIANG Yu-jun. Index system of regional vulnerability of hazard affected bodies and precise quantitative model research［J］. Disaster Science,2010（2）:36-40
［4］李鹤,张平宇,程叶青. 脆弱性的概念及其评价方法［J］. 地理科学进展,2008(2):18-25
LI He, ZHANG Ping-yu, CHENG Ye-qing. Concept of vulnerability and its evaluation method［J］. Progress in Geography,2008（2）:18-25
［5］谭朝阳. 化工园区脆弱性综合评估方法研究［D］. 南开大学,2012
［6］ARAMIS-Accidental Risk Assessment Methodology for Industries, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development［R］. The European Commission Comm unity Research Programme,12,2004
［7］J.Tixier, A.Dandrieux, G.Dusserre, R.Bubbico, L.G. Luccone, R.Carta,B.Silvetti, B.Mazzarotta, S.Di Cave, E.Hubert, N.Rodrigues, O.Salvi, ,et al.Assessment of the environment vulnerability in the surroundings of an industrialsite［J］. Safety and Reliability, in: Bedford, van Gelder (Eds.),Lisse,2003,vol.2,1543-1551
［8］李凤英,毕军,曲常胜,等. 环境风险全过程评估与管理模式研究及应用［J］. 中国环境科学,2010(6):858- 864
LI Feng-ying, BI Jun, QU Chang-sheng, et al. Research and application of environmental risk assessment and management model［J］. China Environmental Science，2010(6):858-864
［9］胡静涛. 化工园区危险脆弱性分析［D］. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨理工大学,2014:9-10
［10］王星,褚挺进. 非参数统计(第二版)［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社，2009:189-192
［11］杜红岩,王延平,卢均臣. 2012年国内外石油化工行业事故统计分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):184-188
DU Hong-yan, WANG Yan-ping, LU Jun-chen. Statistical analysis of accidents in petrochemical industry at home and abroad in 2012［J］. Journal of Safety Scenice and Technology,2013,9(6):184-188
［12］霍然,杨振宏,柳静献. 火灾爆炸控制工程学［M］. 北京：机械工业出版社,2007:117-169
［13］王富喜,毛爱华,李赫龙,等. 基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析［J］. 地理科学,2013(11):1323-1329
WANG Fu-xi, MAO Ai-hua, LI He-long, et al. Shandong province urbanization quality measurement and spatial differences based on entropy method［J］. Analysis of Geography Science,2013(11):1323-1329
［14］徐杨,周延,孙鑫,等. 基于模糊层次分析法的矿井安全综合评价［J］. 中国安全科学学报,2009(5):147-152,179
XU Yang, ZHOU Yan, SUN Xin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of coal mine safety based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process［J］. Chinese Journal of Safety Science,2009(5):147-152,179
［15］汪应洛. 系统工程［M］. 第二版.北京:机械工业出版社,2003:130-140
［16］赵秀雯. 城市埋地天然气管道的脆弱性评估研究［D］. 北京：首都经济贸易大学,2010
相似文献/References:
[1]王铮,荣莉莉.应急响应逻辑流程构建及其应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(2):62.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.010]
WANG Zheng,RONG Li-li.Research on establishing logical process of emergency response and its application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(12):62.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.010]
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- -
