|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]韩艳杰,张志军,李亚俊.基于新型综合集成法的矿井通风系统安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(2):75-80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.013]
　HAN Yan jie,ZHANG Zhi jun,LI Ya jun.Evaluation of mine ventilation system safety based on new comprehensive integrated method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(2):75-80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.013]
点击复制

基于新型综合集成法的矿井通风系统安全评价
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年2期
页码:
75-80
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2014-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of mine ventilation system safety based on new comprehensive integrated method
作者:
韩艳杰;  张志军;  李亚俊
(南华大学 核资源工程学院，湖南 衡阳 421001)
Author(s):
HAN Yan jie;  ZHANG Zhi jun;  LI Ya jun
(School of Nuclear Resources Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang Hunan 421001, China)
关键词:
矿井通风系统; 德尔斐; 层次分析; 灰色聚类; 模糊评判; 综合集成法
Keywords:
mine ventilation system;  delphi;  AHP;  grey clustering;  fuzzy comprehensive evaluation;  comprehensive integrated met
分类号:
TD72
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
矿井通风系统是一个复杂的多因素非线性系统，具有多变、随机和模糊的特点。应用传统的单一评价方法，缺乏系统性和科学性，很难全面地进行安全评价，为了更好地对矿井通风系统安全进行较为客观的定量评价，需要将一种新的综合集成评价方法运用到评价中。通过深入研究德尔斐法、层次分析法、灰色关聚类法以及模糊综合评判法的基本理论，将它们有机地结合起来建立了新型综合集成评价法。在此方法中,应用德尔斐法建立矿井通风系统安全的评价指标体系，采用层次分析法确定各评价指标间的权重,灰色聚类法则用来处理专家评分，对于结果的分析采用模糊综合评判法进行。将不同的理论用于不同的阶段，可以更加全面的考虑矿井通风系统的各种因素，使结果更加准确直观，符合实际。工程实例表明该方法具有较强的逻辑性、实用性和可靠性，为矿井通风系统的安全性提供科学依据。
Abstract:
Mine ventilation system is complex nonlinear system, which is random, fuzzy and changeable in characteristics. The safety evaluation can not be conducted entively by traditional single evaluation method,due to the lack of systematic and scientific nature. In order to solve the problem of weaknesses in current evaluation on mine ventilation system safety, such as lacking of quantitative and total evaluation, a new comprehensive assessment method was introduced. The Delphi method, the Analytical Hierarchy Process ,the Grey Clustering method as well as fuzzy comprehensive evaluation were studied, and the new comprehensive integrated method was established. The actual procedure was:the evaluation index of mine ventilation system was established by Delphi ,the combined weight of the whole evaluation index was ascertained by Analytic Hierarch Process. At the same time, the mark by the experts for mine ventilation system safety assessment was managed by Grey theory, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to analysis the results.Various factors of mine ventilation system were considered by different theories used at various steps, and the results were more precise and practical. The engineering example showed that the method was strong logic, practicality and reliability, and can provide scientific basis for the safety of mine ventilation system.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陆刚,韩可琦,肖桂彬.矿井通风系统可靠性的模糊综合评价［J］.采矿与安全工程学报,2008,25(2):244247 LU Gang,HAN Keqi,XIAO Guibin. Fuzzy integrated evaluation for reliability of mine ventilating system［J］. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2008,25(2):244247
[2］ 任松,王新胜,姜德义,等.矿井通风系统安全性的多层次模糊综合评价［J］.中国安全科学学报,2009,19(10):127131 REN Song,WANG Xinsheng,JIANG Deyi, et al. Multiple fuzzy integrated evaluation for safety of mine ventilating system［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2009,19(10):127131
[3］ 采矿手册编委会.采矿手册,第六卷［M］.北京:冶金工业出版社,1999
[4］ 张秀华,王李管,冯兴隆. 金属矿山通风系统安全性综合评价［J］.中国矿业,2010,19(4):9396 ZHANG Xiuhua, WANG Liguan, FENG Xinglong. Fuzzy integrated evaluation for safety of metal mine ventilation system［J］. China Mining Magazine, 2010,19(4):9396
[5］ 牛肖铮,吕力行,林吉飞,等. 基于模糊数学法的矿井通风系统评价方法研究［J］.矿冶,2013,22(2):1923 NIU Xiaozheng,LV Lixing,LIN Jifei,et al. Study on mine ventilation system Evaluation method based on fuzzy mathematics［J］. Mining & Metallurgy, 2013,22(2):1923
[6］ 李春辉,陈日辉,苏恒瑜.灰色聚类评估模型在矿井通风系统中的应用［J］.煤炭技术,2010,29(3):120122 LI Chunhui, CHEN Rihui, SUHengyu. Grey clustering evaluation model and its application in mine ventilation system［J］. Coal Technology, 2010,29(3):120122
[7］ 刘庆龙,魏夕合,史俊伟,等. 基于灰关联和神经网络的通风系统评价模型［J］. 矿业研究与开发,2012,32(2):6365 LIU Qinglong,WEI Xihe,SHI Junwei,et al. Mine ventilation system assessment model based on ANN and Grey Correlation［J］. Mining Reaserch ＆ Development,2012,32(2):6365
[8］ 李晓荣,周加川,李本一,等. 矿井通风系统安全性的综合集成评价［J］.煤炭技术,2013,32(1):8081 LI Xiaorong,ZHOU Jiachuan,LI Benyi, et al. Integrated assessment of mine ventilation system safety［J］. Coal Technology, 2013,32(1):8081
[9］ 王宏图,黄振华,范晓刚,等. 粗糙集－神经网络理论在矿井通风系统评价中的应用［J］.重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(9):9094 WANG Hongtu, HUANG Zhenhua, FAN Xiaogang,et al.The application of rough setneural network theory to mine ventilation system evaluation［J］. Journal of Chongqing University, 2011,39(9):9094
[10］ 李润求,施式亮,彭新.矿井通风系统安全评价方法及发展趋势［J］.中国安全科学学报,2008,1(18): 112118 LI Runqiu,SHI Shiliang,PENG Xin. Summarization of safety assessment methods for mine ventilation system［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2008,1(18): 112118
[11］ 李昊,肖俊贤,田涛. 基于层次分析法的矿井通风系统灰色综合评价［J］. 煤矿安全,2012,43(10):166169 LI Hao ,XIAO Junxian ,TIAN Tao. The grey comprehensive evaluation of mine ventilation system based on AHP［J］. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012,43(10):166169
[12］ 刘海燕.基于DHGF集成法的火电厂厂址选择评价研究［D］.西安建筑科技大学,2008 LIU Haiyan. The estimation of the site selection of stesm power ststion on DHGF theory［D］. Xi’an University of Architecture &Technology,2008
[13］ 李晓荣.基于综合集成评价方法的矿井通风系统安全评价研究及应用［D］.太原理工大学,2012 LI Xiaorong.Research and application of mine ventilation system safety assessment based on integrated evaluation methods［D］. Taiyuan University of Technology,2012
[14］ 刘思峰,谢乃明.基于改进三角白化权函数的灰评估方法［J］.系统工程学报,2011,26(2):244250 LIU Sifeng,XIE Naiming. A new grey evaluation method based on reformative triangular whitenization weight function［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2011,26(2):244250〖FL)〗〖HJ〗〖HT〗〖ST〗〖WT〗〖LM〗

相似文献/References:

[1]章能胜,张黔生,谢贤平,等.三种确定矿井通风系统设计方案评价指标权重的方法比较[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(12):38.
　ZHANG Neng sheng,ZHANG Qian sheng,XIE Xian ping,et al.Comparative study on three methods for the evaluation index weight of design scheme on mine ventilation system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):38.
[2]程刚,陆卫东,陈志峰,等.基于FAHP-MODM的矿井通风系统可靠性综合评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(2):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.016]
　CHENG Gang,LU Weidong,CHEN Zhifeng,et al.Comprehensive evaluation on reliability of ventilation system in mine based on FAHP-MODM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(2):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.016]
[3]马恒,苗倩斐,韩宝华,等.矿井通风系统稳定性SD预测仿真分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(12):108.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.018]
　MA Heng,MIAO Qianfei,HAN Baohua,et al.SD prediction and simulation analysis on stability of mine ventilation system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(2):108.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.018]
[4]刘剑,刘丽,黄德,等.基于风量-风压复合特征的通风系统阻变型故障诊断[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(1):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.01.014]
　LIU Jian,LIU Li,HUANG De,et al.Resistance variant fault diagnosis of ventilation system based on composite features of air volume and air pressure[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(2):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.01.014]
[5]邵良杉,张佳琦,于保才,等.基于TF-熵权法的矿井通风系统可靠性可拓评价*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(4):106.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.015]
　SHAO Liangshan,ZHANG Jiaqi,YU Baocai,et al.Extension evaluation on reliability of mine ventilation system based on TF-entropy weight method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(2):106.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51004067,51374129)；高校博士学科点专项科研基金(20104324120001)；教育部重点科研基金(211126)；环保部科研基金(监管1209&调查1204,监管1309)；南华大学“铀矿山岩土工程灾害预测与控制”校级创新团队计划项目
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-02-28