|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]万古军,党文义,张广文.化工企业典型保护层中独立保护层的识别研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(5):106-110.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.05.020]
 WAN Gu jun,DANG Wen yi,ZHANG Guang wen.Study on IPL identification of typical protection layers in chemical enterprise[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(5):106-110.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.05.020]
点击复制

化工企业典型保护层中独立保护层的识别研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
9
期数:
2013年5期
页码:
106-110
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2013-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on IPL identification of typical protection layers in chemical enterprise
作者:
万古军12党文义12张广文12
(1中国石油化工股份有限公司青岛安全工程研究院,山东青岛266071; 2化学品安全控制国家重点实验室,山东青岛266071)
Author(s):
WAN Gu jun 12 DANG Wen yi 12 ZHANG Guang wen 12
(1 Qingdao Safety Engineering Institute,SINOPEC,Qingdao Shangdong 266071,China; 2 State Key Laboratory of Chemicals Safety,Qingdao Shandong 266071,China)
关键词:
化工企业保护层分析(LOPA)独立保护层(IPL)要求时失效概率(PFD)
Keywords:
chemical enterprise layer of protection analysis(LOPA)independent protection layer(IPL) probability of failure on demand (PFD)
分类号:
X913
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.05.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
按照独立保护层(IPL)独立性、功能性、完整性、可靠性、可审查性、安全许可保护性和变更管理的要求,对化工企业典型保护层进行了IPL识别。结果表明:本质安全设计、工厂和社区应急响应一般不作为IPL;作为IPL,基本过程控制系统(BPCS)应在物理上与安全仪表功能(SIF)分离,并满足要求时失效概率(PFD)的要求,在规定时间内完成所要求的动作;关键报警和人员响应应满足操作人员能得到采取行动的指示或报警,有足够的响应时间,任务应具有单一性和可操作性;SIF应在功能上独立于BPCS,SIF各元件应能及时提供响应,并满足相应SIL要求;物理保护和释放后保护设施应独立于其他IPL,并根据实际运行环境对其PFD进行修正。通过IPL的识别研究,可指导企业在进行保护层分析(LOPA)时正确的进行IPL识别,确保LOPA结果的准确有效。
Abstract:
According to the requirements of independence, functionality, integrity, reliability, auditability, access security and management of change for an independent protection layer (IPL), an IPL identificatio on typical protection layer in chemical enterprise was conducted. The results showed that the inherently safer design and the emergency response of factory and community were not treated as IPL generally. As IPL, the elements of basic process control systems (BPCS)should be isolated from similar devices in the safety instrumented function(SIF). The requirements of probability of failure on demand(PFD)should be met and the required action must be taken in the time available for BPCS. For the critical alarms and human response, besides the indication for action required by the operator must be detectable, the time available to take the action must be adequate. Moreover, the action should be unique and operable. SIF must be functionally independent from BPCS and meet requirements of SIL. The required action must be taken in the time available for SIF. The physical and postrelease protection devices should be independent from the other IPLs. The appropriate PFD value should be evaluated according to their practical running environment. The results of this paper can instruct the enterprise to identify IPL correctly in layer of protection analysis(LOPA).

参考文献/References:

[1]Crowl A D, Louvar F.J. Chemical process safety : fundamentals with applications(3rd)[M]. New York: Prentice Hall,2011〖ZK)
[2]CCPS. Layer of protection analysis—simplified process risk assessment[M]. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety,2001〖ZK)
[3]Bridges B W, Clark T. Key issues with implementing LOPA (layer of protection ananlysis)—perspective from one of the originators of LOPA[A]. 5th Global congress on process safety[C]. Tampa, Florida: 2009〖ZK)
[4]Dowell A M. Is it really an independent protection layer[A]. 6th Global congress on process safety[C]. San Antonio, Texas: 2010〖ZK)
[5]白永忠,万古军,张广文. 保护层分析中独立保护层的识别研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2011,21(7):7478 BAI Yongzhong,WAN Gujun,ZHANG Guangwen. Study on identification of independent protection layers in Layer of protection analysis [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2011,21(7):7478〖ZK)
[6]IEC. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safetyrelated systems[S]. IEC 61508, 1998〖ZK)
[7]CCPS. Guidelines for pressure relief and effluent handling systems[M]. New York:American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety,1998〖ZK)
[8]IEC. Functional safety—safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector—Part 3:Guidance for the determination of the required safety integrity levels[S]. IEC 615113, 2003〖ZK)
[9]CCPS. Guidelines for safe and reliable instrumented protective systems[M]. New York:American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety,2007〖ZK)
[10]CCPS. Inherently safer chemical processes: a life cycle approach[M]. New York:American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety,1996〖ZK)
[11]白永忠,党文义,葛春涛. 基本过程控制系统(BPCS)作为独立保护层的探讨[J]. 安全、健康和环境,2010,10(4):3639 BAI Yongzhong,DANG Wenyi,GE Chuntao. Discussion on BPCS as nndependent protective layer [J]. Safety Health & Environment,,2010,10(4):3639〖ZK) 〖FL)〖HJ〖HT〖ST〖WT

相似文献/References:

[1]谢红梅,赵江平,宋倩文.化工企业地震次生泄漏事故应急及无害化处理[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):134.
 XIE Hong-mei,ZHAO Jiang-ping,SONG Qian-wen.Emergency measures and harmless treatment of secondary leakage on chemical enterprises in the earthquake[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):134.
[2]王凯全,李亚丽,康美华,等.化工重大危险源区域风险因素的评价与控制[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(6):72.
 WANG Kai quan,LI Ya li,KANG Mei hua,et al.Regional risk factors assessment and control of chemical industry[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(5):72.
[3]高远,杨振宏,刘鹏刚,等.基于组合赋权-VIKOR法的化工企业应急管理能力评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(2):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.025]
 GAO Yuan,YANG Zhenhong,LIU Penggang,et al.Study on evaluation of emergency management capacity in chemical enterprises based on combination weighting-VIKOR method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(5):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.025]
[4]王循庆,孙晓羽.基于公众参与行为的化工企业监管治理演化博弈分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.027]
 WANG Xunqing,SUN Xiaoyu.Evolutionary game analysis on supervision governance of chemical enterprises based on public participation behavior[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(5):180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.027]
[5]高玉格,关磊,王琛,等.铁路沿线可燃重气储罐最小隔离区域划分探讨*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(9):140.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.022]
 GAO Yuge,GUAN Lei,WANG Chen,et al.Discussion on minimum isolation areas of combustible heavy gas storage tank for chemical industries along railways[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(5):140.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.022]
[6]徐德宇,王天瑜,梁跃强,等.基于HFACS的化工企业火灾爆炸事故人因分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(11):66.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.010]
 XU Deyu,WANG Tianyu,LIANG Yueqiang,et al.Analysis on human factors of fire and explosion accidents in chemical enterprises based on HFACS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(5):66.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-07-30