|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张亦男,王佰顺.道化学指数评价法在淮化集团某合成氨厂的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):194-198.
　ZHANG Yi-nan,WANG Bai-shun.Application of DOW’s F&EI method in ammonia plant of Anhui Huainan chemical group[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):194-198.
点击复制

道化学指数评价法在淮化集团某合成氨厂的应用()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年8期
页码:
194-198
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2011-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of DOW’s F&EI method in ammonia plant of Anhui Huainan chemical group
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-08-0194-05
作者:
张亦男； 王佰顺；
安徽理工大学能源与安全学院；
Author(s):
ZHANG Yi-nan; WANG Bai-shun
School of Energy and Safety,Anhui University of Science and Technology,Huainan 23201,China
关键词:
安全评价;  道化法;  合成氨
Keywords:
safety assessment;  DOW’s F&; EI method;  ammonia synthesis
分类号:
X937
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
化工企业由于工艺装置复杂、产品危险性高等特点极易发生事故,极小的安全隐患往往导致重大事故给企业甚至国家带来严重损失。为探求潜在事故的危险性和总损失,在对淮化集团的合成氨厂生产工序流程分析基础上划分三个评价单元,应用美国道化学公司火灾爆炸指数评价法对此三个评价单元分别进行评价并量化可能造成的损失。评价结果显示各评价子单元的危险等级分别为非常大、很大和最轻,采取安全补偿措施后危险等级降为较轻、较轻和最轻,说明采取措施后若发生事故损失将会减少,通过对比补偿前后的财产损失可以说明这一结论。从另一角度来看,表明合成氨厂有较大的安全隐患需有关管理者采取措施以保障安全生产。采用的道化学指数法比较准确地反映出了被评价单位的实际情况,为化工企业的安全生产、安全管理提供了一定参考。
Abstract:
Accidents frequently occur in chemical industry because there are so many risk factors such as complicated processes and dangerous products.Sometimes small hidden troubles may cause serious accidents which bring heavy loss to the plant even our nation.The purpose of the research is to seek the loss of potential danger.According to the analysis based on the production process of ammonia plant of Anhui Huainan chemical group,the process was divided into three evaluation units.Then DOW’s fire and explosion index(F&EI) method was used to evaluate the three units.Assessment result shows that the three assessment subunits risk level are extremely large,very large and the lightest respectively.But after taking safety compensating measures,the three assessment subunits risk level turn to lighter,lighter and the lightest.In the meaning time,the loss of property can be reduced to much lower.Or put it in another way,the ammonia plant has some major hidden dangers require eliminated,the related managers should take some measures to make work condition safe.The method chosen in this study,DOW’s fire and explosion index(F&EI) method,accurately reflects the situation of evaluating unit and provides certain safety management guidance for chemical industry.

参考文献/References:

[] 方兴龙，周 梁．基于道化学法的大型台成氨装置安全评价[J]．工业安全与环保. 2007.33(2)：30~32．FANG Xing-long, ZHOU Liang. Safety Evaluation on Large Scale Synthetic Ammonia device Based on Dow Chemical’s Method [J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection. 2007.33(2)：30~32．[] 吴昊.系统安全评价方法对比研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2009.5(6):209~213. WU Hao. Study on comparison of system safety assessment techniques [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology. 2009.5(6):209~213.[] 赵艳玲，王新，孙明伟，等.盘锦港危险源辨识及危险评价探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2001.5:23~27. ZHAO Yan-ling, WANG Xin, SUN Ming-wei, etal. Hazard identification and risk evaluation in Panjin port [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology. 2001.5:23~27.[] 薛仲卿，曹 雄，朱劭涌,等.火电机组氢冷系统安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术. 2010.6(3):197~200.XUE Zhong-qing, CAO Xiong, ZHU Shao-yong, etal. Safety Assessment on Hydrogen Cooling System of Thermal Power Unit [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology. 2010.6(3):197~200.[] 张伟远.丙烯腈装置火灾爆炸危险指数评价[J].安全健康和环境.2003.3(5):32. ZHANG Wei-yuan. Assessment of Dangerous Index of Fire and Explosion for Acrylic Nitrile Production Facilities [J]. Safety, Health & Environment. 2003.3(5):32.[] 何 川，刘功智，任智刚,等.存在多种化学有害物质作业场所危害性评价[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2009.5(3):173~176. HE Chuan, LIU Gong-zhi, REN Zhi-gang, etal. Hazard evaluation for workplaces with multiple chemical hazardous agents [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology. 2009.5(3):173~176. [] 魏新利,李惠萍，王自健.工业生产过程安全评价M.北京:化学工业出版社，2004.WEI Xin-li, LI Hui-ping, WANG Zi-jian. Safety Evaluation in Industrial Production ProcessM. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004.[] 王起全,徐德蜀.安全评价操作实务[M].北京：气象出版社，2009.101~106.WANG Qi-quan, XU De-shu. Safety Assessment Practices [M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2009.101~106.[] American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Dow’s Fire & Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide [S]. 7th Ed. New York: Dow Chemical Company, 1994. 美国化学工程师研究所. 道化学指数评价法分类指导[S]. 第七版. 纽约:道氏化学公司，1994[] 彭荣华，胡忠于.甲醛生产火灾爆炸危险性分析、评价及安全措施[J].中国安全科学学报. 2007.17(10):151~155.PENG Rong-hua, HU Zhong-yu. Risk Analysis and Assessment on Fire & Explosion in Formaldehyde Production and Its Safety Measures [J]. China Safety Science Journal(CSSJ). 2007.17(10):151~155.[] 陈宝智，吴 敏.本质安全的理念与实践[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2008.4(3):79~83. CHEN Bao-zhi, WU Min. Concepts and practices of inherent safety [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology. 2008.4(3):79~83.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪送,王瑛,李超.BP神经网络在航空机务人员本质安全程度评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(6):35.
[2]段礼祥,张来斌,钱永梅.AHP—模糊综合评价法在离心泵安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):127.
　DUAN Li xiang,ZHANG Lai bin,QIAN Yong mei.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in safety assessme of centrifuge pumpnt[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):127.
[3]金珠,马小平.基于核校准和SVM的煤矿安全组织管理因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):16.
　JIN Zhu,MA Xiao-ping.Analysis of organizational administrative factors in coal mine safety based on kernel alignment and SVM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):16.
[4]陈杨,王为民,姜东方,等.基于故障树与灰色模糊理论的城市CNG加气站安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):123.
　Chen Yang,Wang Wei-min,JIANG Dong-fang,et al.Safety Assessment of the CNG station in city based on the Faulty Tree and Fuzzy-grey Theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):123.
[5]吕显智,马建云,陶昆,等.基于模糊综合评价法的高层宾馆消防安全现状评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):138.
　LV Xian-zhi,MA Jian-yun,TAO Kun,et al.Establish?of fire safety evaluation system for high-rise hotel using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):138.
[6]郭凯旋.PTA生产火灾爆炸危险性分析与评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):167.
　GUO Kai-xuan.Analysis and Assessment on Fire & Explosion Risk for PTA Production[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):167.
[7]朱劭涌,曹雄,刘磊,等.糠醛厂生产过程安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):118.
　ZHU Shao-yong,CAO Xiong,LIU Lei,et al.Safety Assessment on productive process in one furfural factory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):118.
[8]文华,钮英建.功能安全评估在安全评价中的应用体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):116.
　WEN Hua NIU Ying-jian.Research on the Application of Functional Safety Assessment to Safety Evaluation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):116.
[9]李曌,王金安.高速公路工程道路交通安全评价研究及工程应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):120.
　LI Zhao,WANG Jin-an.Study on evaluation of expressway traffic safety and engineering application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):120.
[10]谭东宁,于立友.关于在风电场安全评价中增加信息安全评价内容的建议[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):151.
　Tan Dongning,Yu Liyou.Suggestions on the information security evaluation content increased the safety evaluation of wind power farms[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):151.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2011-03-03
更新日期/Last Update: