|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]霍志勤.中国民航事故调查的客观公正探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):130-134.
　HUO Zhi-qin.Objectivity and justice in accident investigation of CAAC[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):130-134.
点击复制

中国民航事故调查的客观公正探讨()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年8期
页码:
130-134
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2011-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Objectivity and justice in accident investigation of CAAC
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-08-0130-05
作者:
霍志勤；
中国民航局航空事故调查中心； 南京航空航天大学民航学院；
Author(s):
HUO Zhi-qin1; 2
1.Aviation Accident Investigation Center,Civil Aviation Administration of China,Beijing 100028,China)(2.School of Civil Aviation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China
关键词:
事故调查;  客观公正;  民用航空;  安全管理
Keywords:
accident investigation;  objectivity and justice;  civil aviation;  safety management
分类号:
X928
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了防止同类事故重复发生、缓解社会和行业的猜忌和矛盾、提高中国在国际社会的形象和声誉,关注航空事故调查的客观公正已然迫切。从结果和过程两个方面探讨了事故调查中客观公正的内涵,分析了阻碍我国民航事故调查客观公正五个方面的影响因素,系统性提出了解决问题的途径。结果表明,从机构设置、规章建设、人员培养、工程能力、监督机制等方面加以完善,可以改进事故调查的结果客观和过程公正。 更多还原
Abstract:
In order to prevent similar accident from recurring,ease off suspicions and conflict from society and civil aviation sector,improve China’s image and reputation in the international community,it is urgent to pay attention to the topic of objectivity and justice in aviation accident investigation.The connotation of objectivity and justice in aviation accident investigation is discussed from the perspective of result and process,and five influential factors are analyzed.The approach aiming at problem-solving is proposed systematically.The results show that with the improvement of the institutional arrangements,rules construction,personnel training,engineering capability as well as supervision mechanism,result objectivity and process justice in aviation accident investigation can be realized. 更多

参考文献/References:

[1]http://safety.caac.gov.cn/hab/usifarfinallysearch.do?flag=0&fg=3.[DB/OL]（2011-1-4）[2]于辉 贺彦凤 张丽萍 侯丽岩.程序公正的政治哲学意涵 辽宁行政学院学报[J].2010(3).64-65YU Hui HE Yanfeng ZHANG Liping HOU Liyan. Political Philosophy Meaning of Procedure Justice. Journal of Liaoning Administration College[J] 2010(3).64-65[3]张宏波.改进我国事故调查工作的建议.劳动保护[J].2006（3）66-67ZHANG Hongbo. Suggestions on How to Improve China’s Accident Investigation Work. Labour Protection. [J].2006（3）66-67[4]邱洪安.事故调查结论不是行政诉讼的理由.现代职业安全[J].2006（10）68-69QIU Hongan. Accident Investigation Conclusion is not the Reason for Administrative Lawsuit. Modern Occupational Safety. [J].2006（10）68-69[5]龚向和 陈建平.事故调查的法学探讨.现代职业安全[J].2006（3）68-70GONG Xianghe CHEN Jianping. Discussion on Accident Investigation from the Perspective of Law. Modern occupational safety. [J]. 2006（3）68-70[6]李长城.对事故调查组的质疑.西北政法学院学报[J].2007（5）164-169LI Changcheng. Queries toward Accident Investigation Go-team. Journal of Northwest Politics and Law Institute [J].2007（5）164-169[7]孟庆芬.民用航空器事故调查单独立法的必要性.民航管理[J].2008（2）13-16MENG Qingfen. Necessity of Legislation Alone on Civil Aircraft Accident Investigation. Civil Aviation Management[J].2008（2）13-16[8]张辉 邹红 张金专.火灾事故调查引发行政诉讼案件的理性思考.武警学院学报[J].2002（6）32-34ZHANG Hui ZOU Hong ZHANG Jinzhuan. The Reflections on the Administrative Litigation Case Caused by Fire Investigation. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE PEOPLE’S ARMED POLICE FORCE ACADEMY[J].2002（6）32-34[9]陈国华 张华文.我国安全生产事故调查分级培训机制研究.中国安全生产科学技术[J].2009（2）59-64CHEN Guohua ZHANG Huawen. Study on Mechanism of Work Safety Accident Investigation Training at Different Levels in China. Journal of Safety Science and Technology[J].2009（2）59-64[10]陈立宾.生产安全事故调查处理行政程序研究.法制与经济[J].2010（1）43-44CHEN Libin. Study on Administrative Procedure of Production Safety Accident Investigation and Handling. Legal & Economy [J].2010（1）43-44

相似文献/References:

[1]霍志勤,谢孜楠,张永一.航空事故调查中人的因素安全建议框架研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):91.
　HUO Zhi qin,XIE Zi nan,ZHANG Yong yi.Research on the framework of safety recommendations for human factor in aviation accident investigation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):91.
[2]刘铁民.突发事件应急响应规范化势在必行——“7.23”甬温线特大铁路交通事故应急响应反思[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):5.
　LIU Tie-min.Standardization of emergency response is imperative——reflection on the emergency response of the “7.23” Yongwen railway accident? Abstract [J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):5.
[3]曾明荣,王兴.中欧事故报告与调查处理比较研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(5):148.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.023]
　ZENG Ming-rong,WANG Xing.Comparative research on reporting, investigation and disposal of work safety accidents in China and EU[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(8):148.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.023]
[4]张嬿妮,黄罗鑫,温心宇,等.基于文献计量法的火灾灾害研究现状及展望*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(10):181.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.10.027]
　ZHANG Yanni,HUANG Luoxin,WEN Xinyu,et al.Research status and prospect of fire disaster based on bibliometric method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(8):181.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.10.027]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2011-01-04
作者简介：霍志勤，高级工程师，博士研究生
更新日期/Last Update: