|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]夏仲锐,祝文化,罗振源.地下复杂陡倾采空区稳定性评价的改进AHP-TOPSIS法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(5):184-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.05.025]
　XIA Zhongrui,ZHU Wenhua,LUO Zhenyuan.Study on improved AHP-TOPSIS method for stability evaluation of underground complex steeply inclined goaf[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(5):184-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.05.025]
点击复制

地下复杂陡倾采空区稳定性评价的改进AHP-TOPSIS法
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
20
期数:
2024年5期
页码:
184-192
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2024-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on improved AHP-TOPSIS method for stability evaluation of underground complex steeply inclined goaf
文章编号:
1673-193X(2024)-05-0184-09
作者:
夏仲锐; 祝文化; 罗振源
（武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院，湖北 武汉 430070）
Author(s):
XIA Zhongrui;  ZHU Wenhua;  LUO Zhenyuan
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan Hubei 430070,China)
关键词:
陡倾采空区; 稳定性评价; 改进AHP-TOPSIS法; 评价指标
Keywords:
steeply inclined goaf;  stability evaluation;  improved AHP-TOPSIS method;  evaluation index
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.05.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了准确评价地下陡倾采空区的稳定性，提出1种地下复杂陡倾采空区稳定性评价的改进层次分析结合逼近理想解排序（AHP-TOPSIS）法，该方法基于各影响因素之间关联性分析，选取地质因素等3个一级指标与地质构造等14个二级指标建立采空区评价指标体系，采用改进AHP法确定各指标因素权重，通过TOPSIS理论对采空区稳定性等级进行评价，并结合实例将改进AHP-TOPSIS法与其他常用方法的评价结果进行对比分析。研究结果表明：提出的改进AHP-TOPSIS法得到陡倾采空区呈现稳定状态，与现场实际工程相符，改进AHP-TOPSIS法相比于其它方法具有可靠性与优越性。研究结果可为陡倾采空区稳定性的准确评价提供参考。
Abstract:
In order to accurately evaluate the stability of underground steeply inclined goaf,an improved analytic hierarchy process combined with technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (AHP-TOPSIS) method for the stability evaluation of underground complex steeply inclined goaf was proposed.Based on the correlation analysis between various influencing factors,an evaluation index system of goaf was established by selecting 3 first-level indexes (geological factor et al.) and 14 second-level indexes (geological structure et al.).The improved AHP method was used to determine the weight of each index factor.The stability grade of goaf was evaluated by the TOPSIS theory,and the evaluation results of the improved AHP-TOPSIS method were compared with other commonly used methods through case analysis.The results show that through the improved AHP-TOPSIS method,it is obtained that the steeply inclined goaf is in a stable state,which is consistent with the on-site actual project.The improved AHP-TOPSIS method is more reliable and superior compared with other methods.The research results can provide a reference for the accurate evaluation on the stability of steeply inclined goaf.

参考文献/References:

［1］乔兰,董金水,刘建,等.我国地下金属矿山岩爆灾害发生机制及预测方法研究进展［J］.金属矿山,2023,561(3):14-28. QIAO Lan,DONG Jinshui,LIU Jian,et al.Review on the study progress of rockburst mechanism and prediction in underground metal mines in China ［J］.Metal Mine,2023,561(3):14-28.
［2］LEI Z,GU W Z,PAN H,et al.Calculation model of overburden rock failure volume in mined-out area based on brillouin optical time-domain analysis technology ［J］.Optical Fiber Technology,2021,66:102640.
［3］周逸文,张涛,段隆臣,等.我国矿山采空区综合治理研究综述［J］.安全与环境工程,2022,29(4):220-230. ZHOU Yiwen,ZHANG Tao,DUAN Longchen,et al.Summary of research on comprehensive treatment of mine goaf in China ［J］.Safety and Environmental Engineering，2022,29(4):220-230.
［4］黄亮,王会敏,岳立柱,等.基于偏序集的采空区塌陷危险性评价研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(4):134-140. HUANG Liang,WANG Huimin,YUE Lizhu,et al.Study on risk assessment of goaf collapse based on partial order set ［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2019,15(4):134-140.
［5］王高昂,朱斯陶,姜福兴,等.倾斜厚煤层综放工作面煤柱-关键层结构失稳型矿震机理［J］.煤炭学报,2022,47(6):2289-2299. WANG Gaoang,ZHU Sitao,JIANG Fuxing,et al.Seismic mechanism of coal pillar-key layer structure in fully mechanized caving face of inclined thick coal seam ［J］.Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(6):2289-2299.
［6］蓝宇.广东大宝山矿采空区安全形势与对策研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(增刊1):159-164. LAN Yu.Study on safety situation and countermeasures of goaf in Dabaoshan mine［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2022,18(Supplement 1):159-164.
［7］钟储汉.倾斜/急倾斜煤层采空区输气管道工程场地稳定性评价［J］.石油工程建设,2019,45(5):53-57. ZHONG Chuhan.Stability evaluation of gas pipeline engineering site in goaf area of tilting/steeply inclined coal seam ［J］.Petroleum Engineering Construction,2019,45(5):53-57.
［8］任连伟,宁浩,顿志林,等.高速铁路采空区地基“活化”分级方法及工程应用［J］.岩土力学,2022,43(增刊2):401-413. REN Lianwei,NING Hao,DUN Zhilin,et al.“Activation” classification method and its engineering application of high-speed railway subgrade in goaf area ［J］.Rock and Soil Mechanics,2022,43(Supplement 2):401-413.
［9］张志沛,李锋,张海春.急倾斜厚煤层采空区稳定性分析及注浆治理效果评价［J］.科学技术与工程,2021,21(4):1312-1317. ZHANG Zhipei,LI Feng,ZHANG Haichun.Stability analysis and evaluation of grouting treatment effect on goaf of steeply inclined thick coal seam ［J］.Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(4):1312-1317.
［10］SAATY T L.Fundamentals of the analytic hierarchy process ［M］.Pittsburgh:RWS Publications,2000.
［11］HWANG C L,YOON K.Multiple attribute decision making:methods and applications,a state of the artsurvey ［M］.Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1981.
［12］邹友峰,邓喀中,马伟民.矿山开采沉陷工程［M］.徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2003.
［13］张国堂.急倾斜煤层采空区地表残余移动变形特征研究［D］.南京:南京大学,2015.
［14］中华人民共和国交通运输部.采空区公路设计与施工技术细则:JTG/T D31—03—2011［S］.北京:人民交通出版社,2011.
［15］程力,朱明德,吴钦正,等.模糊综合评判在采空区稳定性评价中的应用［J］.现代矿业,2020,36(12):177-180. CHENG Li,ZHU Mingde,WU Qinzheng,et al.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in stability evaluation of goaf ［J］.Modern Mining,2020,36(12):177-180.
［16］WANG L,GUO Q B,YU X X.Stability-level evaluation of the construction site above the goaf based on combination weighting and cloud model ［J］.Sustainability,2023,15(9):7222.

相似文献/References:

[1]李亮,孟浩,全超,等.上游式筑坝法尾矿坝的安全系数随堆筑坝高变化分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):31.
　Li Liang,Meng Hao,Quan Chao,et al.Study on the variation of factor of safety with the dam height for the tailing dam from upstream embankment method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):31.
[2]付士根.基于模糊随机可靠性的边坡稳定性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):98.
　FU Shi gen.Stability assessment of opencast mines slope based on fuzzy stochastic reliability[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(5):98.
[3]陈娇,罗周全,侯造水.基于改进突变级数法的金属矿采空区稳定性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(11):17.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.11.003]
　CHEN Jiao,LUO Zhou quan,HOU Zao shui.Stability evaluation of metal mine goaf based on improved catastrophe progression method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(5):17.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.11.003]
[4]宋志飞,崔琴焕,王群,等.尾矿坝稳定性精细化评价方法的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.001]
　SONG Zhi-fei,CUI Qin-huan,WANG Qun,et al.Study on detailed evaluation method about stability of tailings dam[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(5):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.001]
[5]钟里密,谢全敏,罗忆.基于博弈-可拓理论的隧道围岩稳定性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(1):56.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.01.009]
　ZHONG Limi,XIE Quanmin,LUO Yi.Stability evaluation of tunnel surrounding rock based on gameextension theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(5):56.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.01.009]
[6]石勇,史秀志.基于未确知测度的岩体稳定性多元联系度评价模型*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(11):125.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.11.019]
　SHI Yong,SHI Xiuzhi.Evaluation model on multivariate connection degree of rock mass stability based on unascertained measure[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(5):125.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.11.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2023-10-12
作者简介： 夏仲锐，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为岩土工程。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-30