|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张鹏,潘灏航,杨宗强.基于风险矩阵法和Borda序值法的城市埋地燃气管道风险评价研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(9):116-122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.09.017]
 ZHANG Peng,PAN Haohang,YANG Zongqiang.Research on risk assessment of urban buried gas pipeline based on risk matrix method and Borda ranking method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(9):116-122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.09.017]
点击复制

基于风险矩阵法和Borda序值法的城市埋地燃气管道风险评价研究*
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
19
期数:
2023年9期
页码:
116-122
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2023-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on risk assessment of urban buried gas pipeline based on risk matrix method and Borda ranking method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2023)-09-0116-07
作者:
张鹏潘灏航杨宗强
(西南石油大学 土木工程与测绘学院,四川 成都 610500)
Author(s):
ZHANG Peng PAN Haohang YANG Zongqiang
(School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China)
关键词:
管道安全工程城市燃气管道风险矩阵Borda序值法风险评价
Keywords:
pipeline safety engineering urban gas pipeline risk matrix Borda ranking method risk evaluation
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.09.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为解决传统风险矩阵在风险评价研究中会产生“风险结”,进而导致难以对同一风险等级中的风险事件进行重要度排序等问题,提出1种基于风险矩阵法与Borda序值法相结合的方法,对城市埋地燃气管道风险评价进行研究。首先,采用风险矩阵法对各风险事件进行风险发生可能性等级划分,该过程会产生“风险结”问题;然后,采用线性插值法和Borda排序对传统风险矩阵进行修正;最后,利用该方法对某城市埋地燃气管道风险进行评价。研究结果表明:该方法可以将各个风险事件按照重要度进行排序,进而有效提高风险评价结果准确性;利用该方法评价得到某段城市埋地燃气管道风险等级为中风险。研究结果可为有效预防城市地面活动破坏、设计缺陷、设备故障等重要风险事件,进而为减少城市埋地燃气管道失效等事故发生率等提供一定参考。
Abstract:
In order to solve the problem that the traditional risk matrix will produce “risk knots” in the risk assessment research,which leads to the inability to rank the importance of risk events in the same risk level,the risk assessment study on the urban buried gas pipelines was conducted based on a combined method of risk matrix method and Borda ranking method.Firstly,the risk matrix method was used to classify the risk occurrence possibility of each risk event,,and the “risk knots” problem would be generated in this process.Secondly,the linear interpolation method and Borda ranking method were applied to modify the traditional risk matrix.Finally,the method was used to evaluate the risk of buried gas pipeline in a city.The research results show that this method can sort each risk event according to its importance,and then effectively improve the accuracy of risk assessment results.The risk level of urban buried gas pipeline studied in this paper is the medium risk.The research results can provide some reference for preventing important risk events such as ground activity damage,design defects,equipment failure,and reducing the incidence of urban buried gas pipeline failure accidents.

参考文献/References:

[1]黄忠宏,帅健,徐后佳,等.城镇燃气管道完整性管理效能评价方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(增刊1):165-171. HUANG Zhonghong,SHUAI Jian,XU Houjia,et al.Efficiency evaluation method on integrity management of urban gas pipeline[J].China Safety Science Journal,2021,17(Supplement 1):165-171.
[2]黄维和,郑洪龙,吴忠良.管道完整性管理在中国应用10年回顾与展望[J].天然气工业,2013,33(12):1-5. HUANG Weihe,ZHENG Honglong,WU Zhongliang.Overview of pipeline integrity management application over the past decade and its prospect in future in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(12):1-5.
[3]巴振宁,匡田,梁建文,等.城市燃气管网运行安全风险评估研究进展[J].消防科学与技术,2020,39(4):533-537. BA Zhenning,KUANG Tian,LIANG Jianwen,et al.Research progress on safety risk assessment of urban gas pipeline network operation[J].Fire Science and Technology,2020,39(4):533-537.
[4]张鹏,游亚菲,王璟,等.基于多维云模型的埋地并行油气管道风险评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(7):149-156. ZHANG Peng,YOU Yafei,WANG Jing,et al.Research on risk assessment of buried parallel oil and gas pipelines based on multi-dimensional cloud model[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2022,18(7):149-156.
[5]BADIDA P,BALASUBRAMANIAM Y,JAYAPRAKASH J.Risk evaluation of oil and natural gas pipelines due to natural hazards using fuzzy fault tree analysis[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2019,66:284-292.
[6]RAEIHAGH H,BEHBAHANINIA A,ALEAGHA M M.Risk assessment of sour gas inter-phase onshore pipeline using ANN and fuzzy inference system-case study:the south pars gas field[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2020,68:104238.
[7]柴强飞,肖忠东,高竟喆,等.基于尖锥网络分析法的管道风险评价研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(7):88-93. CHAI Qiangfei,XIAO Zhongdong,GAO Jingzhe,et al.A cone-ANP-based risk assessment study of pipeline[J].China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(7):88-93.
[8]李新宏,韩子月,卢才武,等.老龄城镇油气管道失效风险评价方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(2):93-98. LI Xinhong,HAN Ziyue,LU Caiwu,et al.Research on failure risk evaluation methodology of aging urban oil and gas pipeline[J].China Safety Science Journal,2020,30(2):93-98.
[9]张鹏,范潮海,王璟.基于前景-后悔理论的油气管道风险模态分析[J].安全与环境学报,2021,21(6):2365-2370. ZHANG Peng,FAN Chaohai,WANG Jing.Risk modal analysis of oil and gas pipelines based on prospect-regret theory[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2021,21(6):2365-2370.
[10]张鹏,杨宗强,沈豪,等.灰色理论和DEMATEL在城市燃气管道风险评价中的运用[J/OL].安全与环境学报:1-9[2023-08-02].DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2022.1018.
[11]杨翠兰.基于Borda序值和RBF神经网络的知识链风险预警[J].统计与决策,2011(17):56-59.
[12]PAUL R,GARVEY P R,LANSDOWNE Z F.Risk matrix:an approach for identifying,assessing,and ranking program risks[J].Air Force Journal of Logistics,1998,22(1):18-21.
[13]朱启超,匡兴华,沈永平.风险矩阵方法与应用述评[J].中国工程科学,2003(1):89-94. ZHU Qichao,KUANG Xinghua,SHEN Yongping.Risk matrix method and its application in the field of technical project risk management[J].Engineering Science,2003(1):89-94.
[14]LANSDOWNE Z F,WOODWARD B S.Applying the borda ranking method[J].Air Force Journal of Logistics,1996,20(2):27-29.
[15]党兴华,黄正超,赵巧艳.基于风险矩阵的风险投资项目风险评估[J].科技进步与对策,2006(1):140-143. DANG Xinghua,HUANG Zhengchao,ZHAO Qiaoyan.Risk assessment of venture capital program based on risk matrix[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2006(1):140-143.
[16]刘攀龙.基于风险矩阵+Borda序值法的航母舰载机出动回收风险评估[J].兵器装备工程学报,2021,42(11):64-68. LIU Panlong.Risk assessment of takeoff and landing of carrier-based aircraft based on integrated application of risk matrix and Borda count method[J].Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering,2021,42(11):64-68.
[17]刘巾玮,梁明杰,孙章皓,等.超说明书用药的风险评估体系的建立及应用[J].中国医院药学杂志,2022,42(7):754-757. LIU Jinwei,LIANG Mingjie,SUN Zhanghao,et al.Establishment and application of risk assessment system on off-label drug use[J].Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy,2022,42(7):754-757.
[18]孙志忠,袁慰平,闻震初.数值分析[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2003.
[19]曾小康,冯阳,赖文庆,等.基于AHP-熵权法的城市燃气管道风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(5):130-135. ZENG Xiaokang,FENG Yang,LAI Wenqing,et al.Risk assessment of urban gas pipeline based on AHP and entropy weight method[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2021,17(5):130-135.
[20]巴振宁,韩亚鑫,梁建文.基于改进AHP和模糊综合评价法的燃气管道腐蚀风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2018,18(6):2103-2109. BA Zhenning,HAN Yaxing,LIANG Jianwen.Risk assessment of the gas pipeline corrosion based on the improved AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2018,18(6):2103-2109.
[21]孟博杰,伍颖,陈良若.基于改进风险矩阵法的配气站地震事件序列分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(3):110-116. MENG Bojie,WU Ying,CHEN Liangruo.Analysis of seismic event sequence in gas distribution station based on improved risk matrix method[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2021,17(3):110-116.

相似文献/References:

[1]付邦稳,蒋宏业,徐涛龙,等.基于N-K模型的城市燃气管道失效可能性因素耦合分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(2):145.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.023]
 FU Bangwen,JIANG Hongye,XU Taolong,et al.Coupling analysis on failure possibility factors of urban gas pipeline based on N-K model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(9):145.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.023]
[2]段正肖,辛保泉,谭钦文,等.1种城市燃气管道风险评估模型及其应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(2):117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.019]
 DUAN Zhengxiao,XIN Baoquan,TAN Qinwen,et al.A risk assessment model of urban gas pipeline and it’s application enlightenment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(9):117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.019]
[3]曾小康,冯阳,赖文庆,等.基于AHP-熵权法的城市燃气管道风险评价*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(5):130.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.05.020]
 ZENG Xiaokang,FENG Yang,LAI Wenqing,et al.Risk assessment of urban gas pipeline based on AHP and entropy weight method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(9):130.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.05.020]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2023-02-22
* 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(50974105);中国工程院重大咨询项目(2011-ZD-20);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20105121110003)
作者简介: 张鹏,博士,教授,主要研究方向为工程及企业质量管理、油气管道完整性管理等。
通信作者: 潘灏航,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-12