|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]任倩文,卢昕玮,赵妍,等.“路怒症”的内外生逻辑及影响因素研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(7):162-166.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.07.026]
　REN Qianwen,LU Xinwei,ZHAO Yan,et al.Study on endogenous and exogenous logic and influencing factors of “road rage”[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(7):162-166.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.07.026]
点击复制

“路怒症”的内外生逻辑及影响因素研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
17
期数:
2021年7期
页码:
162-166
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2021-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on endogenous and exogenous logic and influencing factors of “road rage”
文章编号:
1673-193X(2021)-07-0162-05
作者:
任倩文; 卢昕玮; 赵妍; 汤子帆; 吴会珍
（1.长安大学 经济与管理学院，陕西 西安 710064；
2.长安大学 运输工程学院，陕西 西安 710064）
Author(s):
REN Qianwen;  LU Xinwei;  ZHAO Yan;  TANG Zifan;  WU Huizhen
(1.School of Economics and Management,Chang’An University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710064,China;
2.College of Transportation Engineering,Chang’An University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710064,China)
关键词:
路怒症; 内外生逻辑; 影响因素; 灰色关联; Logistic回归
Keywords:
road rage;  endogenous and exogenous logic;  influencing factor;  grey correlation;  Logistic regression
分类号:
X951
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.07.026
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探索“路怒症”的内外生逻辑，运用调查问卷数据，采用灰色关联分析法从即时和长期2方面对引发路怒的原因进行分析。结果表明：在引发路怒的即时原因中，前车或其他车随意变换车道或调头、其他车辆插队或加塞、夜间行驶开远光灯是最重要的3个原因；在引发路怒的长期原因中，工作或生活压力大最易引发路怒。运用Logistic回归分析各主要路怒原因的易发驾驶人群，据此提出针对性建议，以促进城市交通安全有效治理。
Abstract:
In order to explore the endogenous and exogenous logic of “road rage”,the data of questionnaire survey was used to analyze the causes of road rage from both immediate and long-term perspectives by using the grey relational analysis.The results showed that among the immediate causes of road rage,the vehicle in front or other vehicles randomly change lanes or make a U-turn,other vehicles cut in line or jump the queue,and turn on high beams at night were the three most important causes.In the long-term causes of road rage,the large work or life pressure was most likely to trigger the road rage.The Logistic regression was further used to analyze the prone driving crowds of the main causes of road rage,and the targeted suggestions were put forward to promote the effective management of urban traffic safety.

参考文献/References:

［1］汽车公社.2020年全国汽车保有量达2.81亿辆与美国并列世界第一［EB/OL］.(2021-01-13)［2021-06-07］.https://mini.eastday.com/nsa/210113111625202376380-2.html.
［2］GONZALEZ-IGLESIAS B,GOMEZ-FRAGUELA J A,LUENGO-MARTIN M A.Driving anger and traffic violations:gender differences［J］.Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2012,15(4):404-412.
［3］陈宇,庞媛媛,李洋,等.汽车驾驶人愤怒驾驶研究现状及展望［J］.伤害医学(电子版),2015,4(3):54-59. CHEN Yu,PANG Yuanyuan,LI Yang,et al.The current status and prospect of the research on angry driving ［J］.Injury Medicine (Electronic Edition),2015,4(3):54-59.
［4］DEFFENBACHER J L,OETTING E R,LYNCH R S.Development of a driving anger scale［J］.Psychological Reports,1994,74(1):83-91.
［5］STANOJEVIC＇ P,SULLMAN M J M,JOVANOVIC＇ D,et al.The impact of police presence on angry and aggressive driving ［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention,2018,110:93-100.
［6］FIERRO I,GOMEZ-TALEGON T,ALVAREZ F J.Road-rage in the general population ［J］.Gaceta Sanitaria,2010,24(5):423-427.
［7］KERWIN T,BUSHMAN B J.Measuring the perception of aggression in driving behavior［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention,2020,145:105709.
［8］GAIANU P A,GIOSAN C,SARBESCU P.From trait anger to aggressive violations in road traffic ［J］.Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2020,70:15-24.
［9］KAZEMEINI T,GHANBARI-E-HASHEM-ABADI B,SAFARZADEH A.Mindfulness based cognitive group therapy vs cognitive behavioral group therapy as a treatment for driving anger and aggression in Iranian taxi drivers ［J］.Psychology,2013,4(8):638-644.
［10］冯忠祥,雷叶维,张卫华,等.汽车驾驶愤怒研究进展［J］.中国安全科学学报,2016,26(1):15-21. FENG Zhongxiang,LEI Yewei,ZHANG Weihua,et al.Research progress on car driving anger ［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2016,26(1):15-21.
［11］邓院昌,金杰灵.关于驾驶员“路怒症”的研究综述［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2018,37(11):105-111. DENG Yuanchang,JIN Jieling.Review on driver’s “road rage” ［J］.Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science),2018,37(11):105-111.
［12］冯忠祥,雷叶维,周穆雄,等.修订版驾驶愤怒量表在中国驾驶人中的效信度分析［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2016,35(4):141-145. FENG Zhongxiang,LEI Yewei,ZHOU Muxiong,et al.Reliability analysis of the revised driving anger scale in Chinese drivers ［J］.Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science),2016,35(4):141-145.
［13］严利鑫,吴超仲,高嵩,等.驾驶人个体因素对驾驶愤怒情绪影响关系研究［J］.交通信息与安全,2013,31(6):119-124. YAN Lixin,WU Chaozhong,GAO Song,et al.Study on the relationship between driver’s individual factors and driving anger ［J］.Journal of Transportation Information and Safety,2013,31(6):119-124.
［14］郭双,王君,常若松.驾驶员驾驶经验对驾驶愤怒的影响［J］.辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015,38(4):481-485. GUO Shuang,WANG Jun,CHANG Ruosong.Effects of drivers’driving experience on driving anger ［J］.Journal of Liaoning Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,38(4):481-485.
［15］MONTORO L,USECHE S,ALONSO F,et al.Work environment,stress,and driving anger:a structural equation model for predicting traffic sanctions of public transport drivers ［J］.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2018,15(3):497-509.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴会珍,汤子帆,卢昕玮,等.基于熵值法的驾驶人“路怒症”宏观影响因素研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(3):211.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.03.032]
　WU Huizhen,TANG Zifan,LU Xinwei,et al.Research on macro influencing factors of drivers’ road rage based on entropy method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(7):211.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.03.032]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2021-02-26
作者简介： 任倩文，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为经济统计、城市交通安全管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-05