|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]姚敏,方叶祥,汤卫林,等.煤制油基地安全激励因素识别及安全动机模型的实证研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(2):187-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.030]
　YAO Min,FANG Yexiang,TANG Weilin,et al.Empirical study on identification of safety incentive factors and safety motivation model for coaltoliquids base[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(2):187-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.030]
点击复制

煤制油基地安全激励因素识别及安全动机模型的实证研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
16
期数:
2020年2期
页码:
187-192
栏目:
特邀专栏
出版日期:
2020-02-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Empirical study on identification of safety incentive factors and safety motivation model for coaltoliquids base
文章编号:
1673-193X(2020)-02-0187-06
作者:
姚敏; 方叶祥; 汤卫林; 潘旭海; 孙磊; 张晓文
（1.国家能源集团宁夏煤业有限责任公司，宁夏 银川 750001；
2.南京工业大学，江苏 南京 211800；
3.宁夏大学 管理科学研究院，宁夏 银川 750021）
Author(s):
YAO Min;  FANG Yexiang;  TANG Weilin;  PAN Xuhai;  SUN Lei;  ZHANG Xiaowen
(1.National Energy Group Ningxia Coal Industry Co.,Ltd.,Yinchuan Ningxia 750001，China；
2.Nanjing TechUniversity,Nanjing Jiangsu 211800，China；
3.Ningxia University,Academy of Management Sciences，Yinchuan Ningxia，750021)
关键词:
煤制油基地; 因素识别; 安全动机模型
Keywords:
coaltoliquids base;  factor identification;  safety motivation model
分类号:
X915.2
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探求安全是否需要激励以及如果采用激励、从何激励的问题，对848名煤制油基地的员工进行问卷调查，将员工需求分为低层次需求、尊重需求、成就实现需求和超越自我需求4个方面，对每个具体需求构建需求场景。对控制变量进行差异性检验分析和相关性分析，得出文化程度和年龄对不同层次需求的影响，在此基础上进行结构方程模型验证分析。结果表明：安全需要激励，低层需求和成就需求大于尊重需求，超我需求最小，负向激励不受欢迎；受欢迎的因素在不同年龄和文化下略有差异，考核制度、人际关系、物质激励等均排在前列，且安全动机由经济性满足和自我价值实现共同确定，精神激励制度不是安全动机的核心要素。
Abstract:
In order to explore whether safety needs the incentives and the problem about how to use the incentives if adopting them,the questionnaire survey on 848 employees of a coaltoliquids base was conducted.The requirements of employees were divided into four aspects including the lowlevel requirement,respect requirement,achievement realization requirement and surpassing oneself requirement,and the requirement scenario were constructed aiming at each specific requirement.The difference examination analysis and correlation analysis were carried out on the control variables,and the influence of education level and age on the requirements with different levels was obtained,on this basis,the verification analysis of structural equation model was conducted.The results showed that safety needed the incentives,and the bottom requirement and achievement requirement were greater than the respect requirement,Superego demand is the smallest.While the negative incentives were unpopular.The popular factors were slightly different under the age and culture,and the examination system,interpersonal relationship and material incentives were all in the forefront.The safety motivation was determined jointly by the economic satisfaction and selfvalue realization,and the spiritual incentive system is not the core element of safety motivation for workers.

参考文献/References:

［1］郁振山.正确认识安全激励项目——访美国激励营销协会前主席肖恩·洛克［J］.现代职业安全,2018(2):89-92. YU Zhenshan.A correct understanding of safety incentive program：an interview with Sean Locke,former chairman of American incentive［J］.Modern Occupational Safety,2018(2):89-92.
［2］GELLERE S.The truth about safety incentives［J］Professional Safety,1996,41,(10）:34-39.
［3］黄长锁,姚飞,江成效.安全激励计划评估［J］.山西财经大学学报,2004(S1):219-220. HUANG Changsuo,YAO Fei,JIANG Chengxiao.Evaluation of safety incentive plan ［J］.Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,2004 (S1):219-220.
［4］李红霞,田水承.安全激励机制体系分析［J］.矿业安全与环保,2001(3):8-9，63. LI Hongxia,TIAN Shuicheng.Analysis of safety incentive mechanism system ［J］.Mining Safety and Environmental Protection,2001(3):8-9，63.
［5］VICTOR Y H,GRGOIRE M,MARIO R.Understanding reactions to safety incentives［J］.Journal of Safety Research,2001(3):17-30.
［6］AIDA H,YUVIN C,SABRINA J .Literature review on the incentives and solutions for the bypassing of guards and protective devices on machinery［J］.Safety Science,2019,111(1):188-204.
［7］JOHNSON B.Safety incentive and reward programs can help increase work safety［J］.Occupational Health & Safety (Waco,Tex.),2016,85(10)：92.
［8］TURNER D A,BAE J,CHEELY G,et al.Improving resident and fellow engagement in patient safety through a graduate medical education incentive program［J］.Journal of Graduate Medical Education,2018,10(6):671-675.
［9］THAIS R,JOS M V,ISRAEL H.The influence of economic incentives linked to road safety indicators on accidents:the case of toll concessions in spain［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention,2013,59(10):529-536.
［10］ADA S,MATTEO C,GIACOMO A,et al.Proactivity-and-consequence-based safety incentive (PCBSI) developed with a fuzzy approach to reduce occupational accidents［J］.Safety Science,2015,79(11):175-183.
［11］ZHANG S,SHI X Z,YAO S.Safety incentive for labor workers in state-owned mine enterprises in China［J］.Procedia Engineering,2011,26:2230-2238.
［12］STEVE W.Are safety incentive programs effective?［J］.Professional Safety,2018,63(2):66-67.
［13］RUNE E.Strengthening incentives for efficient road safety policy priorities:the roles of cost-benefit analysis and road pricing［J］.Safety Science,2010,48(9)：1189-1196.
［14］KANKAANP E.Economic incentives as a policy tool to promote safety and health at work［J］.Scandinavian Journal of Work,Environment & Health,2010,36(4):319-324.
［15］祁神军,姚明亮,成家磊,等.安全激励对具从众动机的建筑工人不安全行为的干预作用［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(12):186-192. QI Shenjun,YAO Mingliang,CHENG Jialei,et al.Intervention effect of safety incentives on unsafe behavior of construction workerswith herd motivation ［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2018,14 (12):186-192.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2020-02-11
* 基金项目： 江苏省社会科学基金项目（15GLB020）；江苏省高校社会科学重点基金项目（2017ZDIXM075）
作者简介： 姚敏，博士，主要研究方向为煤化工安全管理。
通信作者： 方叶祥，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为工业安全管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-16