|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘峰,邵珠旭.消防员运动性疲劳监测量表的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(5):154-160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.025]
 LIU Feng,SHAO Zhuxu.Research on application of monitor scale on exerciseinduced fatigue of firefighters[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(5):154-160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.025]
点击复制

消防员运动性疲劳监测量表的应用研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年5期
页码:
154-160
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on application of monitor scale on exerciseinduced fatigue of firefighters
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-05-0154-07
作者:
刘峰1邵珠旭2
(1.中国人民警察大学 消防指挥系,河北 廊坊 065000;
2.中国人民警察大学 研究生部,河北 廊坊 065000)
Author(s):
LIU Feng1 SHAO Zhuxu2
(1. Department of Fire Commanding, China People’s Police University, Langfang Hebei 065000, China;
2. Department of Graduate, China People’s Police University, Langfang Hebei 065000, China)
关键词:
消防员训练运动性疲劳
Keywords:
firefighter training exerciseinduced fatigue
分类号:
D631.6
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探索消防员训练疲劳的监测方法及评价手段,通过对《运动员训练状态监测量表》的跨行业检验,分析了消防员运动性疲劳的产生因子;编制了监测量表共42道题目,包括:情绪应激、生理疲劳、心理疲劳3个应激分量表以及自我效能、体能恢复、自我调节、睡眠质量4个恢复分量表;统计得出量表筛查参考值,提出恢复对策。研究结果表明:量表总得分<152分为正常;152~<167分为轻度疲劳;≥167分为中重度疲劳;应激分量表<78分为正常;78~<88分为应激过度轻度疲劳;≥88分为应激过度中重度疲劳;恢复分量表<96分为正常;96~<103分为恢复不足轻度疲劳;≥103分为恢复不足中重度疲劳。
Abstract:
In order to explore the monitoring method and evaluation mean for the training fatigue of firefighters, the generation factors for the exerciseinduced fatigue of firefighters were analyzed through the crossindustry tests of “Athletic Training State Monitor Scale”. A total of 42 subjects of the monitor scale were developed, including three stress subscales of emotional stress, physical fatigue and psychological fatigue, and four recovery subscales of selfefficacy, physical recovery, selfregulation and sleep quality. The reference values of scale screening were obtained through the statistics, and the corresponding recovery countermeasures were put forward. The results showed that the total score of scale being less than 152 was normal, while 152 to 167 was mild fatigue, and greater than or equal to 167 was moderatesevere fatigue. In the stress subscales, the score being less than 78 was normal, while 78 to 88 was excessive stress mild fatigue, and greater than or equal to 88 was excessive stress moderatesevere fatigue. In the recovery subscales, the score being less than 96 was normal, while 96 to 103 was insufficient recovery mild fatigue, and greater than or equal to 103 was insufficient recovery moderatesevere fatigue.

参考文献/References:

[1]周志军,张玉升,王鹏.公安消防部队处置灾难性事故若干问题的思考[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2006,25(6):802-805. ZHOU Zhijun, ZHANG Yusheng,WANG Peng.Considerations for the fire troops to deal with disastrous accidents[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2006,25(6): 802-805.
[2]吴璋. 造成运动损伤的心理和社会因素分析[J]. 体育科学研究, 2001, 5(4):27-28. WU Zhang. The analysis of the psychological and social factors contributing to athletic injury[J]. Sports Sciences Researches, 2001, 5(4):27-28.
[3]曾美英, 晏宁. 运动员应激——恢复问卷的跨文化检验[J].天津体育学院学报, 2007, 22(6):518-520. ZENG Meiying,YAN Ning.Transcultural examination of the recovery-stress questionnaire for athlete[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Sport, 2007, 22(6):518-520.
[4]苗雨. 多维疲劳量表中文版的修订及在军队基层医护人员中的应用研究[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2008.
[5]刘锡丹. 高原高寒、干旱沙漠环境军人心理疲劳及干预研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆医科大学, 2011.
[6]KELLMANN M, KALLUS K W. Recovery-Stress questionnaire for athletes: User manual[M]. USA: Human Kinetice, 2001.
[7]晏宁. 运动员训练状态监测量表的研制[D]. 北京: 北京体育大学, 2003.
[8]LIU F, SHAO Z X. Applicability research of athlete training condition monitoring scale in firefighting profession[C]. The 3rd ICMIBI International Conference on Applied Social Science and Business, Macau, China, September 7-9, 2018.
[9]庹焱, 姜安丽. 中文版简明应对适应量表的研制[J]. 上海护理, 2009, 9(2): 17-21. TUO Yan,JIANG Anli.Development of chinese version concise coping adaptation scale[J]. Shanghai Nursing, 2009, 9(2): 17-21.
[10]解缤, 姚家新. 专业运动员心理疲劳和心理耗竭的社会学成因分析[J]. 天津体育学院学报, 2010, 25(3): 234-237. XIE Bin,YAO Jiaxin.Sociological analysis the causes of psychological fatigue and burnout of professional athletes[J].Journal of Tianjin University of Sport, 2010, 25(3): 234-237.
[11]隗金水, 邹亮畴, 潘慧文. 体育科研中自编量表的内在信度、结构效度量化分析[J]. 广州体育学院学报, 2005,25(6): 110-114. WEI Jinshui,ZOU Liangchou,PAN Huiwen.Analysis on reliability and validity of sports questionnaire[J]. Journal of Guangzhou Sport University, 2005,25(6): 110-114.
[12]熊婧. 大学生社交焦虑自我倾注量表的编制[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
[13]胡明. 中学生常见心理问题简易筛查量表的编制及其筛查参考值、影响因素的分析[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2007.
[14]叶丽青. 消防员的自尊、工作压力对共情疲劳的影响[D].上海:华东师范大学, 2018.
[15]熊科, 王学思, 林旭宏. 一线消防员心理应激的实证研究[J]. 社会心理科学, 2005(S1): 137-143. XIONG Ke,WANG Xuesi,LIN Xuhong.An empirical study on psychological stress of frontline firefighters[J]. Science of Social Psychology, 2005(S1):137-143.
[16]贾铁堂. 谈体育训练的恢复[J]. 田径, 2009(10): 52-54. JIA Tietang.On the recovery of sports training[J]. Track and Field, 2009(10): 52-54.
[17]纪宇.大学生情绪调节自我效能感、人际关系自我效能感与亲社会行为的关系研究[D].济南:济南大学, 2015.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡晔.自给正压式空气呼吸器R式呼吸法测试与应用探析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(7):93.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.017]
 HU Ye.Discussion on test and application of Reilly breathing technique for selfcontained breathing apparatus[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(5):93.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.017]
[2]康茹,傅贵,傅智敏,等.中美消防员殉职原因的对比研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(4):181.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.04.029]
 KANG Ru,FU Gui,et al.Comparative study on death causes of firefighters in China and USA[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):181.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.04.029]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2018-12-29
基金项目: 河北省重点研发计划项目(17275414);廊坊市科技计划项目(2017029015);中国人民警察大学社科基金培育项目(SKJJPY41)
作者简介: 刘峰,硕士,讲师,主要研究方向为抢险救援及体能训练。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-11