|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]那赟,栗继祖,冯国瑞.高危岗位矿工心理倦怠对注意执行功能的影响[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(5):148-153.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.024]
 NA Yun,LI Jizu,FENG Guorui.Influence of psychological burnout for miners at high risk posts on attention executive function[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(5):148-153.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.024]
点击复制

高危岗位矿工心理倦怠对注意执行功能的影响
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年5期
页码:
148-153
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influence of psychological burnout for miners at high risk posts on attention executive function
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-05-0148-06
作者:
那赟1栗继祖12冯国瑞2
(1.太原理工大学 经济管理学院,山西 晋中 030600;
2.太原理工大学 矿业工程学院,山西 太原 030024)
Author(s):
NA Yun1 LI Jizu12 FENG Guorui2
(1. College of Economics & Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong Shanxi 030600, China;
2. College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan Shanxi 030024, China)
关键词:
高危岗位矿工倦怠心智游移注意执行功能
Keywords:
high risk post miners burnout mind wandering attention executive function
分类号:
X910
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究心智游移在倦怠和注意执行功能间的作用机制,有效减少由负性心理状态引起的不安全行为,降低人因事故发生率。在文献研究的基础上,引入心智游移,采用SART范式和AX-CPT范式,以问卷筛选出的100位国有煤炭企业高危岗位作业人员为研究对象,讨论倦怠、心智游移和个体注意执行功能之间的关系。研究结果表明:高频AX试次会引起惯性反应偏向,被试者需要更多的时间来维持线索字母A和解决无效线索B与有效探针X之间的冲突;高倦怠矿工比低倦怠矿工的注意执行控制功能更易受到高频心智游移的影响;心智游移在倦怠与注意执行功能间起到调节作用。
Abstract:
In order to explore the action mechanism of mind wandering between the burnout and attention executive function, and effectively reduce the unsafe behavior caused by negative psychological state and the incidence of human factor accidents, on the basis of literature research, the mind wandering was introduced, and taking 100 workers at high risk posts of stateowned coal enterprises selected by questionnaire as the research objects, the relationship between burnout, mind wandering and individual attention executive function were discussed by using the SART normal form and AX-CPT normal form. The results showed that the high frequency AX trials would cause the inertia response bias, and the subjects needed more time to maintain the clue letter A and solve the conflict between the invalid clue B and the effective probe X. The attention executive control function of the miners with high degree of burnout was more easily to be affected by the high frequency mind wandering than that of the miners with low degree of burnout. The mind wandering played the adjustment role between the burnout and attention executive function.

参考文献/References:

[1]国家煤矿安全监察局.黄明在全国“两会”期间安全防范工作视频会议上强调:深刻汲取事故教训 打好安全防范攻坚战为全国“两会”顺利召开创造安全稳定的社会环境[EB/OL].(2019-02-27)[2019-05-19].http://www.chinacoal-safety.gov.cn/xw/yjglbyw/201902/t20190227_224936.shtml.
[2]李乃文, 刘健, 牛莉霞. 工作倦怠对安全绩效的影响——负性情绪和心智游移的链式中介作用[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(10):71-74. LI Naiwen, LIU Jian, NIU Lixia. Effects of job burnout on safety performance—the chained mediation of negative emotion and mind wandering[J]. Soft Science, 2018, 32(10):71-74.
[3]MCVAY J C, KANE M J . Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task.[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2009, 35(1):196-204.
[4]吴旭, 完颜笑如, 庄达民. 多因素条件下注意力分配建模[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(8):1086-1090. WU Xu, WANYAN Xiaoru, ZHUANG Damin. Attention allocation modeling under multi-factor condition[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 39(8):1086-1090.
[5]完颜笑如, 庄达民, 刘伟. 脑力负荷对前注意加工的影响与分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, 38(4):497-501. WANYAN Xiaoru, ZHUANG Damin, LIU Wei. Analysis on effect of mental workload on preattentive processing[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38(4):497-501.
[6]WICKENS C D, GOH J, HELLEBERG J, et al. Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2003, 45(3):360-380.
[7]李乃文, 牛莉霞. 矿工工作倦怠的结构及其问卷编制[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 35(6):133-137. LI Naiwen, NIU Lixia. Coal miners’ job burnout structure and questionnaire development[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition) , 2009, 35(6):133-137.
[8]尹忠恺, 施凤冉, 李乃文, 等. 安全标志线索对高低倦怠矿工注意返回抑制的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9):33-38. YIN Zhongkai, SHI Fengran, LI Naiwen, et al. Effects of safety cues on inhibition of attention return of miners different in degree of burnout[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(9):33-38.
[9]李乃文, 刘孟潇, 牛莉霞. 矿工工作压力、心智游移与不安全行为的关系[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(10):172-176. LI Naiwen,LIU Mengxiao,NIU Lixia.Relationship among work stress, mind wandering and unsafe behavior of miners[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(10):172-176.
[10]VINSKI M T, SCOTT W. Being a grump only makes things worse: a transactional account of acute stress on mind wandering[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2013, 4(4):730.
[11]FORSTER S, LAVIE N. Distracted by your mind Individual differences in distractibility predict mind wandering[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 2013, 40(1):251.
[12]PAXTON J L, BARCH D M, RACINE C A, et al. Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2008, 18(5):1010-1028.
[13]MASON M F, NORTON M I, VAN HORN J D, et al. Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5810):393-395.
[14]CHEYNE J A, SOLMAN G J F, CARRIERE J S A , et al. Anatomy of an error: a bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors[J]. Cognition, 2009, 111(1):98-113.
[15]RICHMOND L L, REDICK T S, BRAVER T S. Remembering to prepare: The benefits (and costs) of high working memory capacity[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015, 41(6):1764-1777.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘双跃,陈丽娜,周佩玲,等.矿工不安全行为致因分析及控制[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(1):158.
 LIU Shuang yue,CHEN Li na,ZHOU Pei ling,et al.Cause analysis and control measures of miners’ unsafe behaviors[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(5):158.
[2]薛韦一,刘泽功.基于ISM法的矿工安全心理影响因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(12):112.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.12.019]
 XUE Wei yi,LIU Ze gong.Analysis on influence factors of safety psychology for miners based on ISM method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(5):112.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.12.019]
[3]牛莉霞,李乃文,姜群山.煤矿员工工作压力源结构研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(10):55.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.10.009]
 NIU Li-xia,LI Nai-wen,JIANG Qun-shan.Research on structure of occupational stressors for coal miners[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(5):55.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.10.009]
[4]田水承,寇猛.不同年龄组矿工安全行为能力的差异研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):179.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.030]
 TIAN Shui-cheng,KOU Meng.Study on difference in safety behavior capacity between different age groups of miners[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(5):179.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.030]
[5]刘玉姣,刘剑,朱宝岩.认知心理学视角下矿工的信息加工模型研[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(11):161.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.11.027]
 LIU Yu-jiao,LIU Jian,ZHU Bao-yan.Study on information processing model of miners under the view of cognitive psychology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(5):161.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.11.027]
[6]汪伟忠,卢明银,张国宝.基于项目反应理论的矿工应急响应能力评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(4):113.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.021]
 WANG Weizhong,LU Mingyin,ZHANG Guobao.Emergency response ability evaluation for miners based on item response theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(5):113.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.021]
[7]尹忠恺,施凤冉,李乃文,等.矿工安全注意力影响因素的SEM研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(3):113.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.03.018]
 YIN Zhongkai,SHI Fengran,LI Naiwen,et al.Study on influencing factors of miners' safety attention based on SEM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):113.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.03.018]
[8]李乃文,张丽,牛莉霞.工作压力、安全注意力与不安全行为的影响机理模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(6):14.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.06.002]
 LI Naiwen,ZHANG Li,NIU Lixia.Influencing mechanism model of work stress, safety attention and unsafe behavior[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):14.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.06.002]
[9]李乃文,张丽,牛莉霞.不同作业阶段矿工安全注意力的事件相关电位研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(8):96.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.08.015]
 LI Naiwen,ZHANG Li,NIU Lixia.Study on event-related potentials for safety attention of miners in different operation stages[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):96.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.08.015]
[10]邢宝君,唐水清,李乃文,等.ISM耦合ANP矿工安全注意力衰减影响因素模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(9):163.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.026]
 XING Baojun,TANG Shuiqing,LI Naiwen,et al.Model of influencing factors for safety attention attenuation of miners with ISM coupling ANP[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):163.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.09.026]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-03-24
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金项目(51422404);教育部产学研协同育人项目(201801114037);2018年度山西省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(晋教科函〔2018〕33号)
作者简介: 那赟,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为行为安全管理。
通信作者: 栗继祖,博士,教授,主要研究方向为煤矿安全管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-11