|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]温欣岚,罗占业,樊美娜,等.链式风险评估方法研究及工程应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(3):154-160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.025]
　WEN Xinlan,LUO Zhanye,FAN Meina,et al.Research and engineering application of chain risk assessment method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(3):154-160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.025]
点击复制

链式风险评估方法研究及工程应用
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年3期
页码:
154-160
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research and engineering application of chain risk assessment method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-03-0154-07
作者:
温欣岚1; 罗占业2; 樊美娜3; 肖汝诚3; 张兵1; 庄冬利3
（1.中国路桥工程有限责任公司，北京 100011; 2.中交第二公路局工程有限公司，陕西 西安 710065; 3.同济大学 土木工程学院，上海 200092）
Author(s):
WEN Xinlan1; LUO Zhanye2; FAN Meina3; XIAO Rucheng3; ZHANG Bing1; ZHUANG Dongli3
(1. China Road and Bridge Corporation, Beijing 100011, China; 2. CCCC Second Highway Engineering Co., Ltd., Xi’an Shaanxi 710065, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
关键词:
链式风险; 关联机理; 工程风险评估; 内罗毕国家公园特大桥
Keywords:
chain risk;  correlation mechanism;  engineering risk assessment;  Nairobi National Park Super Major Bridge
分类号:
X947;U447
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为解释工程中各类风险事件间存在的关联机理，将风险事件间的关联关系提炼为链式结构，给出了工程链式风险评估的整套流程和方法。以内罗毕国家公园特大桥施工期生态、灾害、安全风险全过程风险评估为例，阐明了该方法的应用过程，并与独立风险评估方法进行了比较。研究结果表明：链式风险评估方法计算量较大，评估步骤较为繁杂，当风险事件数量较大时其可操作性较差；当对某几项风险极为关注时，对其进行小范围的链式风险分析可使评估结果更加真实全面。 工程链式风险评估方法具有可行性和适用性。
Abstract:
In order to explain the existence of correlation mechanism between various risk events in the engineering, the correlation between the risk events was epurated into the chain structure, and the whole procedure and method of chain risk assessment on the engineering were presented. Taking the whole process risk assessment on the ecological, disaster and safety risks during the construction period of Nairobi National Park Super Major Bridge as an example, the application process of this method was clarified and compared with the independent risk assessment method. The results showed that the calculation amount of chain risk assessment method was relatively large, the assessment steps were relatively complex, and the operability was relatively poor when the amount of risk events was large. When certain several risks were extremely concerned, the chain risk analysis on them with small range could make the assessment results more real and comprehensive. The chain risk assessment method of engineering had the feasibility and applicability.

参考文献/References:

［1］VAIDYA O S, KUMAR S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 169(1): 1-29.
［2］ANDRIC＇ J M, LU DG. Risk assessment of bridges under multiple hazards in operation period［J］. Safety Science, 2016, 83: 80-92.
［3］ANTHONY C J. What’s wrong with risk matrices? ［J］. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 2008, 28(2): 497-512.
［4］ELHAG T M S, WANG Y M. Risk assessment for bridge maintenance projects: neural networks versus regression techniques［J］. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007, 21(6): 402-409.
［5］刘小勇,沈立,孙明义.桥梁工程规划设计阶段施工安全风险评估的研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):79-83. LIU Xiaoyong, SHEN Li, SUN Mingyi. Research on the construction safety risk assessment in the planning and design stages of bridge engineering［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(8):79-83.
［6］桂志敬,吴忠广,严琼, 等.公路隧道施工安全风险评估方法优化研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(9):136-143. GUI Zhijing, WU Zhongguang, YAN Qiong, et al. Study on optimization of safety risk assessment method for highway tunnel construction［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2018,14(9):136-143.
［7］曹吉鸣, 申良法, 彭为, 等. 风险链视角下建设项目进度风险评估［J］. 同济大学学报（自然科学版）,2015,43(3):468-474. CAO Jiming, SHEN Liangfa, PENG Wei, et al. Novel method for schedule risks assessment in construction projects from perspective of risk chain［J］. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science)， 2015, 43(3): 468-474.
［8］RAJ T, SHANKAR R, SUHAIBM. An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: The case for India［J］. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46(24): 6883-6912.
［9］张磊, 樊治平, 乐琦. 考虑风险关联情形的风险评估方法研究［J］. 运筹与管理, 2011 (6): 188-195. ZHANG Lei, FAN Zhiping, YUE Qi. A method for estimating risks considering the interrelationships among risks［J］. Operations Research and Management, 2011 (6): 188-195.
［10］李存斌, 陆龚曙. 工程项目风险元传递的系统动力学模型［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(12): 2731-2739. LI Cunbin, LU Gongshu. System dynamics model of construction project risk element transmission［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2012, 32(12): 2731-2739.
［11］李藐, 陈建国, 陈涛, 等. 突发事件的事件链概率模型［J］. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010 (8): 1173-1177. LI Miao, CHEN Jianguo, CHEN Tao, et al. Probability for disaster chains in emergencies［J］. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2010 (8): 1173-1177.
［12］李继清, 张玉山, 王丽萍, 等. 洪灾综合风险结构与综合评价方法 (Ⅰ)—宏观方面［J］. 武汉大学学报（工学版）, 2005, 38(5): 19-23. LI Jiqing, ZHANG Yushan, WANG Liping, et al. Structure and evaluation of integrated risk for flood disaster (Ⅰ)-macro-view［J］. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2005, 38(5): 19-23.
［13］YANG X, CHENG L, HUANG M, et al. Research on Risk Assessment Model in Waters Adjoining Bridge Based on Bayesian Network［C］//ICTIS 2011: Multimodal Approach to Sustained Transportation System Development［A］.Information, Technology, Implementation， 2011: 2597-2605.
［14］ESKESEN S D, TENGBORG P, KAMPMANNJ, et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: international tunnelling association, working group No. 2［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(3): 217-237.
［15］李书韬, 程进. 模糊层次分析方法在大跨度桥梁施工期风险评估中的应用［J］. 结构工程师, 2011, 27(5): 159-162. LI Shutao, CHENG Jin. AHP-FCE method for construction period risk evaluation of long-span bridges［J］. Structural Engineers, 2011, 27(5): 159-162.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期： 2019-01-04
基金项目： 中国交建科技研发项目（2016-ZJKJ-10）；北京市科学技术委员会课题（Z181100003918005）；中国交建科技研发项目（2017-ZJKJ-08）；上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目（17DZ1204204）
作者简介： 温欣岚，硕士研究生，高级工程师，主要研究方向为土木工程施工管理。
通信作者： 樊美娜，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为桥梁工程风险评估。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-15