|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]雷雨,吴超,王秉.人对声信号的安全认知模型构建及其应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(6):27-32.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.004]
　LEI Yu,WU Chao,WANG Bing.Construction and application of safety cognition model for human to acoustic signals[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(6):27-32.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.004]
点击复制

人对声信号的安全认知模型构建及其应用
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年6期
页码:
27-32
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2018-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction and application of safety cognition model for human to acoustic signals
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-06-0027-06
作者:
雷雨1; 2; 吴超1; 2; 王秉1; 2
（1.中南大学 资源与安全工程学院，湖南 长沙 410083；2.中南大学安全理论创新与促进研究中心，湖南 长沙 410083）
Author(s):
LEI Yu1; 2;  WU Chao1; 2;  WANG Bing1; 2
(1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China;2. Safety & Security Theory Innovation and Promotion Center(STIPC), Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China)
关键词:
声信号; 安全认知; 安全模型; 故障诊断
Keywords:
acoustic signal;  safety cognition;  safety model;  fault diagnosis
分类号:
X913
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为明晰人对声信号的安全认知过程，进而提高人对声信号的安全认知效率和质量，对声信号安全认知过程、模型及其应用进行深入研究。首先，厘清声信号安全认知的阶段和理论基础；其次，从认知活动链角度，建立声信号安全认知的理论模型并分析模型内涵；最后，提出安全策略并构建实际声信号安全认知场景。结果表明：声信号安全认知过程的确存在安全信息不对称现象；针对声信号安全信息不对称现象，以声信号安全认知模型为基础，分析影响声信号安全认知的因素，提出声信号安全认知故障诊断方法，控制由安全信息不对称引起的安全事故。
Abstract:
In order to clarify the human safety cognitive process of sound signal and improving the efficiency of safety cognition, the cognitive process and model of acoustic signal safety and its application are deeply studied. First of all, it clarified the stage and theoretical basis of understanding sound signal safety cognition. Secondly, from the perspective of cognitive activity chain, the connotation of the model was analyzed and the theoretical model called acoustic signal safety cognitive model was established, Finally, the actual acoustic signal safety cognition scene was constructed and the safety suggestion was proposed. The results show that the safety information asymmetry does exist in the acoustic safety cognition process. According to the acoustic signal asymmetric information, safety to acoustic signal cognitive model was based on analysis of the factors influencing the safety of signal cognition, and a fault diagnosis method for sound signal safety cognition was proposed to control safety accidents caused by asymmetric information.

参考文献/References:

［1］蒋英杰, 孙志强, 李龙,等. 典型认知模型及其在人因可靠性分析中的应用评述［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2011, 11(1):197-201.JIANG Yingjie, SUN Zhiqiang, LI Long, et al. Review of typical cognitive models and their application in human reliability analysis［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2011, 11(1): 197-201.
［2］徐娟芬. 数字界面信息认知失误的眼动分析研究［D］. 南京：东南大学, 2015.
［3］CHANG Y H J, MOSLEH A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 2: IDAC performance influencing factors model［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(8): 1014-1040.
［4］CHANG Y H J, MOSLEH A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents Part 1: Overview of the IDAC Model［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(8): 997-1013.
［5］孙志强, 史秀建, 李欣欣,等. 基于认知模型的人为差错分类方法［J］. 国防科技大学学报, 2008, 30(1):73-77.SUN Zhiqiang, SHI Xiujian, LI Xinxin, et al. A framework for classifying human errors based ox cognitive model［J］. Journal of national university of defence technology, 2008, 30(1): 73-77.
［6］赵潮锋, 周西华. 安全信息缺失事故致因理论的初步研究［J］. 世界科技研究与发展, 2012, 34(1):6-9.ZHAO Chaofeng, ZHOU Xihua. Preliminary study on theory of accident-causing based on safety information missing［J］. World Sci-Tech R&D, 2012, 34(1): 6-9.
［7］黄仁东, 刘倩倩, 吴超,等. 安全信息学的核心原理研究［J］. 世界科技研究与发展, 2015，37(6):646-649.HUANG Rendong, LIU Qianqian, WU Chao, et al. Study on core principles of safety information［J］. World Sci-Tech R&D, 2015, 37(6): 646-649.
［8］王瑛, 汪送. 复杂系统安全事故致因分析的“认知-约束”模型［J］. 工业安全与环保, 2013, 39(8):83-86.WANG Ying, WANG Song.Cognitive Constraint Model in Complex System Safety Accident Causation Analysis［J］. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2013, 39(8): 83-86.
［9］吴超. 安全信息认知通用模型构建及其启示［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(3): 5-11. WU Chao. Construction of universal model on safety information cognition and its enlightenment［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(3): 5-11.
［10］RAJESH Raghunathan, SRINATH R, SASIKUMAR R, et al. Modeling safety risk perception due to mobile phone distraction among four wheeler drivers［J］. IATSS Research, 2017, 41(1): 30-37.
［11］LINDEN S V D. The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model［J］. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, 41(3):112-124.
［12］CHANG Y H J, MOSLEH A. The IDA cognitive model for the analysis of nudear power plant operator response under accident conditions. Part I: problem solving and decision making model［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1997,55（1）: 51-71.
［13］关伟. 驾驶员对交通标志的视觉信息认知过程实验研究［D］. 北京：北京工业大学, 2014.
［14］翟慧强, 张金萍, 王丹,等. 听觉模型综述［J］. 机械工程师, 2014(3):19-22.ZHAI Huiqiang,ZHANG Jinping,WANG Dan,et al.Survey on Auditory Model［J］. Mechanical engineer, 2014 (3): 19-22.
［15］张友辅. 对噪音的环境控制［J］. 北京纺织, 1982(2):61-66.ZHANG Youfu. Environmental control of noise ［J］. Beijing textile, 1982(2): 61-66.
［16］张辉, 张新波. 《船上噪声等级规则》修订案解析及应对措施［J］. 船舶标准化工程师, 2013, 46(1):28-29.ZHANG Hui, ZHANG Xinbo. Analysis and Countermeasures of the amendments to 《the rules of the ship’s noise level》［J］. Ship Standardization Engineer, 2013, 46(1): 28-29.
［17］张力, 廖可兵. 安全人机工程学［M］. 北京：中国劳动社会保障出版社, 2007.
［18］约翰·安德森. 认知心理学及其启示［M］. 北京：人民邮电出版社, 2012.
［19］翟进乾. 配电线路在线故障识别与诊断方法研究［D］.重庆：重庆大学, 2012.
［20］宜昌市商务局(粮食局). 省安委会办公室关于湖北当阳市马店矸石发电有限责任公司“8·11”重大高压蒸汽管道裂爆事故调查结案的通知［EB/OL］. ( 2017-09-25)［2018-06-21］.http://swj.yichang.gov.cn/content-40727-970649-1.html.
［21］王秉,吴超.安全标语有效性影响因子研究［J］.广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 16(10): 29-37.WANG Bing,WU Chao.Research on Factors Influencing the Validity of Safety Slogan［J］.Journal of Guangzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,16(10):29-37.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴建金,耿修林,傅贵.基于中介效应法的安全氛围对员工安全行为的影响研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(3):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.03.14]
　WU Jian jin,GENG Xiu lin,FU Gui.Study on the impact of safety atmosphere to employee safety behavior based on the intermediary effect method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(6):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.03.14]
[2]刘恩斌,温櫂荣,郭冰燕,等.基于声信号特征分析的燃气管道探测识别方法*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(4):61.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.009]
　LIU Enbin,WEN Zhaorong,GUO Bingyan,et al.Detection and recognition methods of gas pipelines based on acoustic signal feature analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(6):61.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.009]
[3]王永刚,王慧莹.安全教育对机务维修人员违规行为的影响路径研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(7):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.07.028]
　WANG Yonggang,WANG Huiying.Research on influence path of safety education on violation behavior of maintenance personnel[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(6):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.07.028]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(51534008)；中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2018zzts744）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-05