|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]曲晶瑀,杨晶,孙晓峰,等.螺旋侧板对立管水动力影响的数值模拟研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(7):156-162.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.07.025]
 QU Jingyu,YANG Jing,SUN Xiaofeng,et al.Numerical simulation study on hydrodynamic effect of helical strakes to riser[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(7):156-162.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.07.025]
点击复制

螺旋侧板对立管水动力影响的数值模拟研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
13
期数:
2017年7期
页码:
156-162
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2017-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Numerical simulation study on hydrodynamic effect of helical strakes to riser
文章编号:
1673-193X(2017)-07-0156-07
作者:
曲晶瑀杨晶孙晓峰柏明星
(东北石油大学 石油工程学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318)
Author(s):
QU Jingyu YANG Jing SUN Xiaofeng BAI Mingxing
(Petroleum Engineering College, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing Heilongjiang 163318, China)
关键词:
螺旋侧板水动力大涡模拟阻力系数升力系数
Keywords:
helical strakes hydrodynamic LES drag coefficient lift coefficient
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.07.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对附有三板式螺旋侧板的立管水动力影响问题展开三维数值模拟研究,采用CFD大涡模拟方法,对不同的螺旋侧板高度h和螺距P在雷诺数分别为3 900,10 000和20 000条件下进行模拟分析,得到立管后方阻力系数CD、升力系数CrmsL、斯特劳哈尔数St及其频谱等特性。模拟结果表明:螺旋侧板对立管升力和阻力有明显的抑制效果,升力系数均方根值CrmsL较光滑立管降幅最大达到95.8%,但随着螺旋高度h的增加,会引起立管的阻力增加,螺旋高度h为0.1D~0.2D(D为立管直径)时的抑制效果较好,并且h为0.1D时的抑制效果最为理想;CD值和CrmsL值均随螺距P的增大而增大并保持在较低值范围,两者均在P=12.5D附近出现了随螺距P的增大而减小的现象,侧板螺距P在取值为5D~17.5D范围内的选择对立管的升力和阻力抑制效果较好。
Abstract:
The three-dimensional numerical simulation study on the hydrodynamic effect of riser with three-plate helical strakes was carried out. The simulation analysis was conducted under different heights h and pitch P of helical strakes with the Reynolds number of 3 900, 10 000 and 20 000 respectively by using the CFD Large Eddy Simulation (LES) method, and the characteristics of drag coefficient CD, lift coefficient CrmsL, Strouhal number St and its frequency spectrum behind the riser were obtained. The results showed that the helical strakes had an obvious inhibitory effect on the lift force and drag force of riser. The root mean square value of lift coefficient CrmsL had the maximum decreasing amplitude of 95.8% compared with the smooth riser, but with the increase of height h, the drag force of riser increased. The inhibitory effect was better when the height h was 0.1D - 0.2D, and the inhibitory effect was the best when the height h was 0.1D. Both the drag coefficient CD and the lift coefficient CrmsL increased with the increase of pitch P and kept in the range of lower values, but both of them decreased with the increase of pitch P when P was around 12.5D. The pitch P of helical strakes had better inhibitory effect on the lift force and drag force of riser when the pitch P was in the range of 5D - 17.5D.

参考文献/References:

[1]时米波. 深水钻井隔水管系统疲劳可靠性分析[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2008.
[2]薛鲁宁, 樊建春, 张来斌. 海上钻井井喷事故的蝴蝶结模型[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(2):79-83. XUE Luning, FAN Jianchun, ZHANG Laibin. Bow-tie model for offshore drilling blowout accident[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(2):79-83.
[3]谷家扬. 张力腿平台复杂动力响应及涡激特性研究[D]. 上 :上海交通大学, 2013.
[4]薛鸿祥, 唐文勇, 张圣坤. 深海立管涡激共振疲劳寿命简化计算方法[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(5):231-234. XUE Hongxiang, TANG Wenyong, ZHANG Shengkun. A simplified method to estimate riser fatigue life caused by votex-induced resonance[J].Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(5):231-234.
[5]张文冬. 海洋立管涡激振动及抑振技术的实验研究[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学, 2011.
[6]吴浩, 孙大鹏. 深海立管涡激振动被动抑制措施的研究[J]. 中国海洋平台,2009,24(4):1-8. WU Hao,SUN Dapeng. Study on suppression measures for vortex-induced vibration of the deepwater riser[J].China Offshore Platform,2009,24(4):1-8.
[7]Allen D W, Henning D L, Lee L W.Performance comparisons of helical strakes for VIV suppression of risers and tendons[A].Offshore Technology Conference[C]. 2004:264-273.
[8]Zhou T, Cheng L, Razali S F M, et al. On the study of vortex-induced vibration of a cylinder with helical strakes[J]. Journal of Fluids & Structures, 2011, 27(7):903-917.
[9]Ranjith E R, Sunil A S, Pauly L. Analysis of Flow over a Circular Cylinder Fitted with Helical Strakes[J]. Procedia Technology, 2016, 24: 452-460.
[10]王增波, 黄维平,苑健康,等. 立管扰流装置Helical Strakes的数值模拟分析[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2011, 24(4):79-83. WANG Zengbo,HUANG Weiping,YUAN Jiankang,et al. Numerical analysis on the helical strakes around riser[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2011, 24(4):79-83.
[11]王福军. 计算流体动力学分析[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2004:139-142.
[12]Pope S B. Turbulent Flows[M]. 北京:世界图书出版公司, 2010:433-444.
[13]Wornom S, Ouvrard H, Salvetti M V, et al. Variational multiscale large-eddy simulations of the flow past a circular cylinder: Reynolds number effects[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2011, 47(1):44-50.
[14]Dong S, Karniadakis G E, Ekmekci A, et al. A combined direct numerical simulation-particle image velocimetry study of the turbulent near wake[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 569:185-207.
[15]Norberg C. Fluctuating lift on a circular cylinder: review and new measurements[J]. Journal of Fluids & Structures, 2003, 17(1):57-96.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(51474073);黑龙江省科学基金项目(QC2016055)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-08-21