|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]付士根,张兴凯,李红辉.超深竖井掘进岩爆特征及防治措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(12):48-52.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.008]
 FU Shigen,ZHANG Xingkai,LI Honghui.Characteristics and prevention and control measures of rock burst in excavation of ultra-deep shaft[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(12):48-52.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.008]
点击复制

超深竖井掘进岩爆特征及防治措施
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年12期
页码:
48-52
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2016-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Characteristics and prevention and control measures of rock burst in excavation of ultra-deep shaft
文章编号:
1673-193X(2016)-12-0048-05
作者:
付士根1 张兴凯1 李红辉2
(1.中国安全生产科学研究院,北京 100012;2.金诚信矿业管理股份有限公司,北京 101500)
Author(s):
FU Shigen1 ZHANG Xingkai1 LI Honghui2
(1.China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China;2.JCHX Mining Management Co., LTD, Beijing 101500, China)
关键词:
超深竖井掘进岩爆地应力测量分布规律防治措施
Keywords:
excavation of ultra-deep shaft rock burst in-situ stress measurement distribution law prevention and control measures
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
由于会泽矿3#超深竖井(施工深度达1 526 m)的工程地质条件,在竖井开挖到一定深度后有不同程度的岩爆现象显现,其中两次比较严重的岩爆发生的位置埋深较深,井筒深度达到1 400 m以上。为此建立了井壁地应力监测系统,对岩爆的发生进行预测。根据井壁周边不同深度布置的4个点处的应力变化曲线分析,总结了地应力分布规律,4#位置(东偏南70°)井壁受测压力最大,最大水平主应力可以达到120 MPa以上,其方位与最大主应力方向相符。结合3#竖井工程岩爆现象的分析,以及岩爆发生的特征,给出了预防岩爆所采取的工程措施,为此类工程施工制定岩爆防治措施提供了科学依据。
Abstract:
Due to the engineering geological conditions of 3# ultra-deep shaft in Huize Mine (the construction depth reached 1 526 m), the rock burst phenomena with varying degrees appeared when the shaft excavated to a certain depth, among which, two more serious rock burst occurred in the locations with deeper depth, and the depth of shaft reached above 1 400 m. Therefore, an in-situ stress measurement system of shaft lining was established to predict the occurrence of rock burst. The distribution laws of in-situ stress were summarized according to the analysis on the stress variety curves of four points laid at different depth surrounding the shaft lining. It showed that the measured stress on the shaft lining at 4# position (east by south 70°) was the largest, the maximum horizontal principal stress could reach above 120 MPa, and its orientation was consistent with the direction of the maximum principal stress. The engineering measures for prevention and control of rock burst were put forward combining with the analysis on rock burst phenomenon of 3# shaft and the characteristics of rock burst. It can provide scientific basis for formulating the prevention and control measures of rock burst in similar engineering construction.

参考文献/References:

[1]孔繁军.大直径1500 m深竖井施工技术难点与对策分析[J].中国矿山工程,2015,44(1):35-36, 59. KONG Fanjun. Analysis of technical difficulties and countermeasures for 1 500 m shaft construction with large diameter[J]. Journal of China Mine Engineering, 2015,44(2):35-37.
[2]Hoek E. BrownE T.Underground Excavat ion in Rock.London: Institut e ofMining and Metallugy, 1980.
[3]KIDYBINSKI A. Bursting liability indices of coal[J]. Int. J. Rock Mech.Min.Sci.& Geomech.Abstr, 1981, 18(4): 295- 304.
[4]MANSUMV VA.Prediction of rockbursts by analysis of induced seis-micity data[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Miming Sciences,2001(38):26-29.
[5]侯发亮等. 圆形隧道中岩爆的判据及防治措施. 岩石力学在工程中的应用[M]. 北京:知识出版社, 1989.
[6]蔡美峰,刘卫东,李 远.玲珑金矿深部地应力测量及矿区地应力场分布规律[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(2):227-232. CAI Meifeng,LIUWeidong,LIYuan. IN-Situ streww measurement at deep position of Linglong gold mine and distrbutton law of-situ stress field in mine area[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010,29(2):227-232.
[7]唐绍辉,吴壮军,陈向华.地下深井矿山岩爆发生规律及形成机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(8):1250-1254. TANG,Shaohui,WU Zhuangjun,CHEN Xianghua. Approach to occurrenceand mechanism of rockburst in deep underground mines[J]. ChineseJournal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2003,22(8):1 250-1 254.
[8]冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,明华军,等.深埋隧洞岩爆孕育规律与机制:即时型岩爆[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(3):434-442. (FENG Xiating,CHEN Bingrui,MING Huajun,et al. Evolution law and mechanism of rockbursts in deep tunnels:Immediate rockburst[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012,31(3):434-442.
[9]许梦国,杜子建,姚高辉,等.程潮铁矿深部开采岩爆预测[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(s1):2924-2927. XU Mengguo,DU Zijian,YAO Gaohui,et al.Rockburst prediction of chengchao iron mine during deep mining.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008,27(s1):2924-2927.)
[10]吉学文,王春来,吴爱祥,等.某深井矿山岩爆特征及形成机理研究[J].金属矿山,2008,387(9):23-25, 30. JI Xuewen,WANG Chunlai,WUAixiang,et al.Studyon the rockbust mechanism and characteristics in a deep mine[J].Metalmin,2008,387(9):23-25, 30.
[11]殷有泉,李平恩,邸元.竖井开挖的不稳定性和岩爆的力学机制[J].力学学报,2014,46(3):398-408. YIN Youquan,LI Ping’en,DI Yuan.Instability of shaft excavation and mechanism of rockburst[J].Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,2014,46(3):398-408.
[12]周宗红,侯克鹏,金小川.会泽铅锌矿深部岩体岩爆倾向性实验研究[J].昆明理工大学学报,2014,39(1):21-25. ZHOU Zonghong,HOU Kepeng,JIN Xiaochun.Experimental study on rockburst tendency of deep rockmass in huize Lead-Zinc mine[J].Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology,2014,39(1):21-25.
[13]黎 昕,周宗红,金小川,等.白云岩单轴压缩试验声发射特性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(10):10-14. LIXin,ZHOU Zonghong,JIN Xiaochuan, et al.Research on acoustic emission characteristics of dolomites based on uniaxial compression test[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013,9(10):10-14.

相似文献/References:

[1]藕明江,周宗红,王友新,等.不同卸荷速率条件下岩爆碎屑破坏特征分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):97.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.016]
 OU Mingjiang,ZHOU Zonghong,WANG Youxin,et al.Analysis on failure characteristics of rock burst fragments under different unloading rate condition[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(12):97.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.71373245);国家安监总局“双超”项目(No.2014JBKY05)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-01-13