|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李军,张宏,梁海滨,等.基于模糊综合评价的燃气管道第三方破坏失效研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):140-145.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.024]
 LI Jun,ZHANG Hong,LIANG Haibin,et al.Study on failure of gas pipeline due to third party damage based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(8):140-145.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.024]
点击复制

基于模糊综合评价的燃气管道第三方破坏失效研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年8期
页码:
140-145
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on failure of gas pipeline due to third party damage based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
作者:
李军12张宏1梁海滨2赵琪棋3任乐梅3焦文玲3
(1. 中国石油大学<北京>机械 与储运学院,北京 102249 ;2. 中石油昆仑燃气有限公司,北京 100101; 3.哈尔滨工业大学 市政环境工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150090)
Author(s):
LI Jun12 ZHANG Hong1 LIANG Haibin3 ZHAO Qiqi3 REN Lemei3 JIAO Wenling3
(1. College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; 2. PetroChina Kunlun Gas Co., LTD, Beijing 100101, China; 3. School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin Heilongjiang 150090, China)
关键词:
燃气管道第三方破坏层次分析模糊数学失效
Keywords:
gas pipeline third party damage analytic hierarchy process fuzzy mathematics failure
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对燃气管道第三方破坏事故复杂的特点,基于层次分析和模糊数学的理论,计 算燃气管道第三方破坏风险失效的可能性。全面识别城镇燃气管道第三方破坏事故的危 害因素,构建包含56个基本事件的燃气管道第三方破坏故障树。利用模糊集合隶属函数 ,计算燃气管道发生第三方破坏事故基本事件的模糊概率。利用改进的层次分析法,得 出各专家权重并修正各专家的评估意见,计算管道第三方破坏失效的可能性。以某大型 省会城市燃气管道为例进行验证分析,证明该方法的风险评价结果与实际情况相符,可 为燃气公司安全风险防控提供依据。
Abstract:
Aiming at the characteristics of complexity for gas pipeline accidents due to third party damage, the possibility of gas pipeline failure due to the risk by third party damage was calculated based on the theories of analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy mathematics. The hazard factors of third party damage accidents for urban gas pipeline were identified comprehensively, and a fault tree of third party damage for gas pipeline was constructed, which included 56 basic events. The fuzzy probability of basic events were calculated by using the fuzzy set membership function. The weights of each expert were determined and the evaluation opinions of each expert were revised by using the improved analytic hierarchy process method, then the possibility of gas pipeline failure due to third party damage was calculated. The validation analysis was conducted by taking the urban gas pipeline in a large provincial capital city as example, and it showed that the risk evaluation structure of this method was in line with the actual situation. It can provide basis for the prevention and control of safety risk in gas company.

参考文献/References:

[1]黄小美,彭世尼,杨俊杰,等. 国内典型城市燃气管道失效调查与分析[J].煤气 与热力,2010,30(9):26-29. HUANG Xiaomei, PENG Shini,YANG Junjie, et al. Investigation and analysis on failure of gas pipeline in typical domestic cities [J].Gas & Heat, 2010, 30(9):26-29.
[2]中国新闻网.北京一老旧小区发生燃气爆燃事故[EB/OL]. http://www.bj.chinanews.com/news/2016/0410/51287.html,2016-04-10.
[3]赵建平.埋地燃气管道第三方破坏模糊综合评价法[J].天然气工业, 2008, 28 (11):103-105. ZHAO Jianping. Fuzzy comprehensive analysis method and its application in the third-party damage assessment of the buried gas piping[J].Natural Gas Industy, 2008, 28(11):103-105
[4]朱震江, 杨晓翔.城市埋地燃气管道模糊故障树分析[J].合肥工业大学学报(自 然科学版),2007, 30(12):1686-1690. ZHU Zhenjiang,YANG Xiaoxiang.Fuzzy fault tree analysis of urban underground gas pipelines[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology,2007, 30 (12):1686-1690.
[5]魏春荣,李艳霞,孙建华,等.事故树结构重要度的求解方法[J].黑龙江科技学 院学报, 2012, 22(1):84-88. WEI Chunrong,LI Yanxia,SUN Jianhua, et al.Solution method for accident tree structural importance[J].Jouranl of Heilongjiang Institute of Science % Technology, 2012, 22(1):84-88.
[6]张增刚, 朱向凤.基于模糊故障树的城市燃气输配系统安全评估[J].山东建筑工 程学院学报, 2006, 21(3):239-242. ZHANG Zengang, ZHU Xiangfeng. Safety assessment to urban gas transmission and distribution system based on fuzzy fault tree[J].Journal of Shandong University of Architecture, 2006, 21(3):239-242.
[7]李卫宁, 高洪林, 马亮.潜艇鱼雷应急发控系统故障树最小割集的求解[J].四川 兵工学报, 2010, 31(8):43-46. LI Weining,GAO Honglin,MA Liang.The solution of the minimal cut set of the fault tree of the submarine torpedo emergency control system[J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance,2010, 31(8):43-46.
[8]李青,陆廷金.模糊重要度分析方法的研究[J].模糊系统与数学,2000,14( 1) : 89-93. LI Qing,LU Tingjin. The study on the methods of fuzzy Signficance analysis[ J].Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics,2000,14( 1) : 89-93.
[9]陈利琼. 在役油气长输管道定量风险技术研究[D].西南石油学院,2004:10- 15.
[10]CHEN Shujen, HWANG C hinglai. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods and applications [M].Berlin :Springer-Verlag , 1990.
[11]宋高峰,潘卫东,杨敬虎等.基于模糊层次分析法的厚煤层采煤方法选择研究[ J].采矿与安全工程学报,2015,32( 1) :35-41. SONG Gaofeng, PAN Weidong, YANG Jinghu. Research on selection of thick coal seam mining method based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2015,32( 1) :35-41.
[12]郝长胜,盛军坤.利用层次分析和模糊数学法优选采矿方案[J].辽宁工程技 术大学学报,2016,35( 7) :696-700. HAO Changsheng, SHENG Junkun. Using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy mathematics method to optimize the mining plan[J].Journal of Liaoning Technical University,2016,35( 7) :696-700.
[13]李军,张宏.城镇燃气管道第三方破坏因素的模糊概率分析[J].天然气与石 油,2016,34( 2) :109-114. LI Jun, ZHANG Hong. Fuzzy probability analysis of the third party damage factor for urban gas pipeline[J].Natural Gas and Oil,2016,34(2):109-114 .

相似文献/References:

[1]王文和,易俊,沈士明.基于风险的城市埋地燃气管道安全评价模型及应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):163.
 WANG Wen-he,YI Jun,SHEN Shi-ming.Safety evaluation model and application for the urban buried gas pipeline based on risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(8):163.
[2]王文和,董传富,刘林精,等.基于贝叶斯网络的城市地下燃气管网动态风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(5):55.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.009]
 WANG Wenhe,DONG Chuanfu,LIU Linjing,et al.Dynamic risk analysis of urban buried gas pipeline network based on Bayesian network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(8):55.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(51534008)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-08-30