|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李新宏,李秀美,陈国明,等.2 000 m超深水水下分离器泄漏油气扩散特性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):38-43.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.007]
　LI Xinhong,LI Xiumei,CHEN Guoming,et al.Study on dispersion characteristics of leaking oil and gas from subsea separator in 2 000 m ultra deepwater[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):38-43.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.007]
点击复制

2 000 m超深水水下分离器泄漏油气扩散特性研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年1期
页码:
38-43
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2016-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on dispersion characteristics of leaking oil and gas from subsea separator in 2 000 m ultra deepwater
文章编号:
1673-193X（2016）-01-0038-06
作者:
李新宏; 李秀美; 陈国明; 朱红卫
（中国石油大学<华东> 海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心,山东 青岛 266580）
Author(s):
LI Xinhong;  LI Xiumei;  CHEN Guoming;  ZHU Hongwei
(Center for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao Shandong 266580, China)
关键词:
深水; 水下分离器; 失效泄漏; 油气扩散; 数值仿真
Keywords:
deepwater;  subsea separator;  failure leakage;  dispersion of oil and gas;  numerical simulation
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
深水水下分离器服役过程中由于腐蚀、地质灾害和环境高压作用，存在失效泄漏风险。针对2 000 m超深水水下分离器可能存在的失效泄漏问题，基于计算流体动力学CFD方法，建立分离器失效泄漏后果数值仿真分析模型，对分离器泄漏场景进行模拟与分析，研究2 000 m水深条件下分离器泄漏油气扩散规律，并考虑不同泄漏位置对油气扩散行为的影响。结果表明：水下分离器泄漏包括压力扩散和自由扩散两个阶段，压力扩散阶段历时极短，自由扩散阶段耗时较长；泄漏口位置对泄漏结果有较为明显的影响，分离器上部泄漏，油气全部溢出，分离器中下部泄漏，大部分油气保留于分离器内部，最终形成分明的油气水界面；分离器内部压力随时间迅速上升，t=0.25 s左右接近于20 MPa，后期在20 MPa左右呈极微小波动，泄漏速率随分离器内部压力增大迅速减小，达到最低点之后，呈微小波动状变化。
Abstract:
There exists the risk of failure leakage for subsea separator due to corrosion, geological disaster and high environmental pressure. Aiming at the possible failure leakage of subsea separator in 2 000 m ultra deepwater, a numerical simulation model on leakage consequence of separator was established based on CFD method to simulate and analysis the leakage scenarios of separator. The dispersion characteristics of leaking oil and gas from subsea separator in 2 000 m ultra deepwater were studied with considering the influence of different leakage location on the dispersion behavior of oil and gas. The results showed that subsea separator leakage involves 2 stages, that is pressure diffusion and free diffusion. The duration of pressure diffusion stage is very short, while that of free diffusion stage is relatively long. The leakage location has an obvious impact on the leakage results, all the oil and gas in separator spills out when leakage occurs in the top of separator, but most of oil and gas remains inside of the separator when the leakage occurs in the middle or bottom of separator, and the apparent interfaces between oil, gas and water appear finally. The internal pressure of separator rises rapidly over time and reaches 20 MPa after 0.25 s, then fluctuate slightly around 20 MPa. The leakage rate decreases rapidly with the increasing internal pressure of separator, and presents tiny fluctuation change after reaching the lowest point.

参考文献/References:

［1］陈家庆．海洋油气开发中的水下生产系统(一)［J］.石油机械, 2007, 35(5): 54-58. CHEN Jiaqing. Water production system in marine oil and gas development［J］.China Petroleum Machinery, 2007, 35(5): 54-58.
［2］高杰. 深水水下分离器结构安全性分析与评估［D］.青岛:中国石油大学( 华东)，2012.
［3］王春升. 水下生产系统在南海流花4-1油田开发中的研究与应用［J］.中国造船，2010,51(增2):174-179. WANG Chunhua. Application of subsea production system in Liuhua 4-1 oilfield［J］. Ship Building of China, 2010,51(S2):174-179.
［4］DNV-RP-F301. Subsea separator structural design ［S］. 2007.
［5］葛玖浩, 李伟, 陈国明, 等. 2 000 m超深水水下分离器承压结构强度分析［J］. 石油机械, 2015,43(2):60-64. GE Jiuhao, LI Wei, CHEN Guoming, et al. Strength Analysis on Bearing Structure of Subsea Separator for 2 000 m Ultra Deepwater［J］. China Petroleum Machinery, 2015,43(2):60-64.
［6］赵梦一, 葛玖浩, 李伟, 等. 超深水水下分离器摆锤法下放风险分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015,11(9):151-157. ZHAO Mengyi, GE Jiuhao, LI Wei, et al. Risk assessment on pendulous installation of subsea separator in ultra deepwater［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015,11(9):151-157.
［7］王瑞金, 张凯. Fluent 技术基础与应用实例［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社, 2007: 35.
［8］魏超南, 陈国明, 刘康. 浮式生产系统泄漏天然气爆燃特性与安全区域［J］. 石油学报, 2014,35(4):786-794. WEI Chaonan,CHEN Guoming, LIU Kang. Leakage gas deflagration characteristics and safety area of FPSO［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014,35(4):786-794.
［9］邓海发, 陈国明. 基于CFD的深水钻井溢油事故定量风险评估［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2012,12(2):233-236. DENG Haifa, CHEN Guoming. CFD-based quantitative hazard assessment of oil spills in deepwater drilling［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2012,12(2):233-236.
［10］API-RP-581. Risk-Based Inspection Technology ［S］. 2008.
［11］李新宏, 朱红卫, 陈国明, 孟祥坤. 海底管道泄漏天然气扩散规律数值模拟［J/OL］. 油气储运, http://www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/13.1093.TE.20151229.1017.008.html?

相似文献/References:

[1]薛鲁宁,樊建春,张来斌.基于马尔可夫方法的水下防喷器可靠性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(10):72.
　XUE Lu ning,FAN Jian chun,ZHANG Lai bin.Research on reliability of subsea blowout preventer based on Markov method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):72.
[2]孟会行,陈国明,朱 渊,等.基于PERT图的LMRP集油罩深水井喷应急作业设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(2):114.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.019]
　MENG Hui xing,CHEN Guo ming,ZHU Yuan,et al.PERTbased design of LMRP cap emergency operation for deepwater blowout[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(1):114.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.019]
[3]雷军,樊建春,刘书杰,等.基于数理统计的深水防喷器系统安全关键性失效分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):106.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.018]
　LEI Jun,FAN Jian-chun,LIU Shu-jie,et al.Analysis on safety critical failure of deepwater BOP system based on mathematical statistics[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(1):106.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.018]
[4]赵梦一,葛玖浩,李伟,等.超深水水下分离器摆锤法下放风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(9):151.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.09.024]
　ZHAO Meng-yi,GE Jiu-hao,LI Wei,et al.Risk assessment on pendulous installation of subsea separator in ultra deepwater[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(1):151.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.09.024]
[5]徐文静,刘少杰,陈国明,等.深水内波条件下井喷原油扩散规律数值仿真分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(11):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.002]
　XU Wenjing,LIU Shaojie,CHEN Guoming,et al.Numerical simulation on diffusion law of crude oil resulting from blowout under internal wave in deep water[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.002]
[6]曹文科,邓金根,谭强,等.深水钻井热交换作用下的井壁稳定性分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(6):53.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.06.008]
　CAO Wenke,DENG Jingen,TAN Qiang,et al.Analysis on stability of borehole under the effect of heat exchange in deepwater drilling[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(1):53.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.06.008]
[7]朱敬宇,陈国明,曹恩泽,等.基于DEMATEL/ISM的深水井喷风险影响因素研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(8):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.001]
　ZHU Jingyu,CHEN Guoming,CAO Enze,et al.Study on influencing factors of deepwater blowout risk based on DEMATEL/ISM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(1):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.001]
[8]张智,王博,刘和兴,等.南海某深水高温高压气井SS-15型井口头系统薄弱点安全评价*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(4):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.04.015]
　ZHANG Zhi,WANG Bo,LIU Hexing,et al.Safety evaluation on weak points of SS-15 wellhead system in a deep water high temperature and high pressure gas well in South China Sea[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(1):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.04.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家“863” 高技术研究发展计划项目(2013AA09A213)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(14CX06123A)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-01