|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]汤静,石必明,陈昆.典型结构走廊火灾烟气流场的数值模拟研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):33-37.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.006]
　TANG Jing,SHI Bi-ming,CHEN Kun.Numerical simulation of fire smoke flow in typical structure of building corridor[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(10):33-37.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.006]
点击复制

典型结构走廊火灾烟气流场的数值模拟研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年10期
页码:
33-37
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2015-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Numerical simulation of fire smoke flow in typical structure of building corridor
文章编号:
1673-193X(2015)-10-0033-05
作者:
汤静1; 石必明1; 陈昆2
(1.安徽理工大学能源与安全学院，安徽 淮南 232001；2.安徽理工大学电气与信息工程学院，安徽 淮南 232001)
Author(s):
TANG Jing1;  SHI Bi-ming1;  CHEN Kun2
（College of Energy and Safety, Anhui University of Science ＆ Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China）
关键词:
建筑火灾;  不同走廊结构;  烟气流动;  数值模拟
Keywords:
building fire;  different corridor structures;  smoke transportation;  numerical simulation
分类号:
X932
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
选取条形、L形、T形和环形走廊4种典型建筑结构为研究对象，使用火灾模拟软件FDS对4种典型结构的走廊发生火灾时的烟气流动规律进行了分析。初步得出建筑结构对于火灾烟气的流动和温度分布的影响：对于有封闭转角处的L形和环形走廊，转角处受到建筑封闭结构的阻碍和反浮力作用，热烟气易积聚;而无论何种形式的走廊，都会由于壁面限制和反浮力作用造成走廊末端热烟气的积聚;T形走廊交叉口处流通性较好，相对安全;这些容易造成烟气积聚的走廊转角和走廊末端的温度也会有所上升，而现在很多连接走廊的疏散楼梯都设置在走廊两端，反而不利于人员疏散。因此这些地方应引起重视，加强防火排烟措施。
Abstract:
Four kinds of building corridors with typical structure including the bar type, L type, T type and circular type were selected as the research objects, and the fire simulation software FDS was applied to analyze the smoke transportation laws in fire scenarios of the four types of corridors with typical structure. The influence of building structure on transportation and temperature distribution of fire smoke was obtained preliminarily. For L type and circular type corridors with closed corner, the hot smoke is easily to accumulate in the corner of corridor by the effect of blocking by closed structure and anti buoyancy. While for no matter what kinds of corridors, the hot smoke is easily to accumulate in the end of corridor by the effect of wall restriction and anti buoyancy. The intersection of T type corridor has a better circulation and is relatively safe. The temperature in the corner and end of corridor which are easy to cause smoke accumulation will also rise, while at present, the evacuation stairs of many connecting corridors have been set on both ends of the corridor, which is unfavourable for evacuation. So more importance should be attached in these places, and the fire prevention and smoke exhaust measures should be enhanced.

参考文献/References:

［1］杨培培，石必明，穆朝明，等. 建筑物条形走廊烟气运动特性研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012，8(7):11-15YANG Pei-pei, SHI Bi-ming, MU Chao-ming, et al. Numerical simulation of the fire smoke flue in a building corridor［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(7):11-15
［2］毛龙，乐增，金润国. 高校宿舍火灾数值模拟与分析［J］. 河南理工大学学报, 2009, 28(4):418-423MAO Long, LE Zeng, JIN Run-guo. Numerical simulation and analysis of college dormitory fire［J］. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University, 2009, 28(4):418-423
［3］张宇金，许秦坤，李仕雄. 高校宿舍走廊火灾烟气运动的数值模拟［J］. 西 南 科 技 大 学 学 报, 2013, 28(1):49-53ZHANG Yu-jin, XU Qin-kun, LI Shi-xiong. Numerical simulation of the fire smoke movement in the college dormitory［J］. Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2013, 28(1):49-53
［4］冯文兴，杨立中，方廷勇，等. 狭长通道内火灾烟气毒性成分空间分布的实验［J］. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2006, 36(1):61-64FENG Wen-xing, YANG Li-zhong, FANG Ting-yong, et al．The spatial distribution of toxicant species in fires in a long corridor ［J］. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China , 2006, 36(1): 61-64
［5］赵江平，冯文兴，武来喜. 建筑火灾烟气中CO迁移规律的FDS模拟［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(6):16-20ZHAO Jiang-ping, FENG Wen-xing, WU Lai-xi. Numerical simulation on the spreading rule of CO in building fire by FDS ［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(6): 16-20
［6］冯文兴. 典型建筑结构中火灾危害性气体向远处的传播特点和分布规律［D］. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2007
［7］张甲雷. 长通道内火灾烟气中一氧化碳生成和分布规律的研究［D］. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2012
［8］范维澄，孙金华，陆守香，等. 火灾风险评估方法学［M］.北京：科学出版社,2004
［9］杨世铭，陶文铨．传热学［M］.北京：高等教育出版社，2011
［10］王学谦.建筑防火安全技术［M］.北京：化学工业出版社,2006

相似文献/References:

[1]阎卫东,张宪立.建筑物火灾时人员的认知水平对疏散心理和行为影响研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):108.
　YAN Wei-dong,ZHANG Xian-li.Study on effect of people’s cognitive level on evacuation psychology and behavior in building fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(10):108.
[2]侯龙飞,李铭,崔武远,等.风速对高层建筑火灾时环境中烟气分布的影响[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):53.
　HOU Long-fei,LI Ming,CUI Wu-yuan,et al.The Influence of the wind speed on the soot distribution in the high-rise building fire environment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(10):53.
[3]张云明.公众聚集场所火灾疏散性能化分析方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):70.
　ZHANG Yun-ming.Study on safe evacuation with Performance-based Analytical Method in Public Gathering Place[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(10):70.
[4]李俊华.建筑火灾坍塌危险性的评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(7):226.
　LI Jun hua.Risk assessment for collapse in building fire accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(10):226.
[5]徐坚强,刘小勇,苏燕飞,等.基于贝叶斯网络的建筑火灾动态风险评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(2):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.02.022]
　XU Jianqiang,LIU Xiaoyong,SU Yanfei,et al.Study on dynamic risk assessment method of building fire based on Bayesian network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(10):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.02.022]
[6]贾进章,李雪娇.基于遗传-蚁群算法的单层建筑火灾疏散路径规划研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(6):122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.06.020]
　JIA Jinzhang,LI Xuejiao.Research on evacuation path planning in single-story building fire based on genetic-ant colony algorithm[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(10):122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.06.020]
[7]王心凯,何清,唐飞.坡地建筑外立面火灾温度演化研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(1):23.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.004]
　WANG Xinkai,HE Qing,TANG Fei.Study on temperature evolution in external facade fire of slope building[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(10):23.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(E041003)
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-12-01