|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李莎莎,崔铁军,马云东.基于空间故障树理论的系统可靠性评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(6):68-74.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.06.011]
 LI Sha-sha,CUI Tie-jun,MA Yun-dong.Study on assessment method of system reliability based on space fault tree theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(6):68-74.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.06.011]
点击复制

基于空间故障树理论的系统可靠性评估方法研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年6期
页码:
68-74
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2015-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on assessment method of system reliability based on space fault tree theory
作者:
李莎莎12崔铁军123 马云东3
(1. 安全科学与工程学院, 辽宁工程技术大学,辽宁 阜新 123000;2. 矿山热动力灾害与防治教育部重点实验室,辽宁 阜新 123000;3. 辽宁省隧道与地下结构工程技术研究中心, 大连交通大学, 辽宁 大连 116028)
Author(s):
LI Sha-sha12 CUI Tie-jun123 MA Yun-dong3
(1. College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin Liaoning 123000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mine Thermodynamic Disasters and Control of Ministry of Education, Fuxin Liaoning 123000, China; 3. Tunnel & Underground Structure Engineering Center of Liaoning, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian Liaoning 116028, China)
关键词:
安全系统工程系统可靠性空间故障树故障状态划分因素敏感性
Keywords:
safety system engineering system reliability spatial fault tree fault state division factor sensitivity
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.06.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究可靠性对工作环境变化敏感的一类系统,利用空间故障树SFT的思想和方法,并结合T-S模糊故障树和贝叶斯网络,建立了一种系统可靠性评估方法。总结了T-S模糊故障树和BN网络评价系统可靠性时存在的问题,并在所提出的方法中予以解决。方法中将事件的故障状态划分为:无故障a、轻度故障b、严重故障c、完全故障d四种状态,分别用a,b,c,d表示。故障率为[0~30%)、[30%~60%)、[60%~85%)、[85%~100%),并得到了划分的规则。研究了该系统在不同故障状态下的有效范围。得到了系统在不同状态之间过渡时的特征,并分析了过渡期间的可靠性对因素敏感度问题。
Abstract:
In order to study a kind of system with the reliability sensitive to the change of work environment, using the idea and method of the space fault tree (SFT), and combined with T-S fuzzy fault tree and Bayesian network, an assessment method of system reliability was established. The problems of system reliability assessment existing in T-S fuzzy fault tree and BN network were summarized, and the problems were solved in the proposed method. The fault state was divided into four types as follows: no fault, light fault, serious fault, complete fault, which were representative respectively with a (failure rate of 0~30%), b (failure rate of 30%~60%), c (failure rate of 60%~85%), d (failure rate of 85%~100%), and the partition rules were obtained. The effective ranges of the system under different fault conditions were studied. The characteristics of system with transition between different states were obtained, and the sensitivity problem of reliability to factors during the transition was analyzed.

参考文献/References:

[1]姚成玉, 张荧驿, 王旭峰, 等. T-S模糊故障树重要度分析方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2011,22(11):1261-1268 YAO Cheng-yu, ZHANG Ying-yi, WANG Xu-feng, et al. Importance analysis method of fuzzy fault tree based on T-S model[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2011,22(11):1261-1268
[2]姚成玉, 陈东宁, 王斌. 基于 T-S 故障树和贝叶斯网络的模糊可靠性评估方法[J]. 机械工程学报,2014,50(2):193-201 YAO Cheng-yu, CHEN Dong-ning, WANG Bin. Fuzzy reliability assessment method based on T-S fault tree and bayesian network[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2014,50(2):193-201
[3]陈东宁, 姚成玉, 党振. 基于T-S模糊故障树和贝叶斯网络的多态液压系统可靠性分析[J]. 中国机械工程,2013,24(7):899-905 CHEN Dong-ning, YAO Cheng-yu, DANG Zhen. Reliability analysis of multi-state hydraulic system based on T-S Fuzzy Fault Tree Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2013,24(7):899-905
[4]姚成玉,党振,陈东宁, 等. 基于 T-S 模糊故障树分析的液压系统故障搜索策略[J]. 燕山大学学报, 2011,35(5):407-412 YAO Cheng-yu, DANG Zhen, CHEN Dong-ning, et al. Fault search strategy of hydraulic system based on T-S fuzzy fault tree analysis[J]. Journal of Yanshan University, 2011,35(5):407-412
[5]Marquez D, Neil M, Fenton N. Solving dynamic fault trees using a new hybrid bayesian network inference algorithm [C]. Mediterranean Conference on Control Automation, 2008: 1526-1531
[6]Yuge T, Yanagi S. Quantitative analysis of a fault tree with priority AND gates [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008, 93(11): 1577-1583
[7]Zhou Z B, Ma C Q, Zhou J L, Dong D D. Dynamic fault tree analysis based on dynamic Bayesian networks [J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2008, 28(2): 35-42
[8]Dutuit Y, Rauzy A. A linear-time algorithm to find modules of fault trees [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1996, 45(3): 422-425
[9]Barlow R E. Using influence diagrams [C]. Accelerated life testing and experts’opinions in reliability, 1988:145-157
[10]Boudali H, Dugan J B. A new bayesian network approach to solve dynamic faulttrees [C]. Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium,2005: 451-456
[11]Boudali H, Dugan J B. A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling andanalysis framework [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2005, 87(3):337-349
[12]崔铁军, 马云东. 多维空间故障树构建及应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013,23(4):32-37 CUI Tie-jun, MA Yun-dong. Research on multi-dimensional space fault tree construction and application[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(4):32-37
[13]崔铁军,马云东. 空间故障树的径集域与割集域的定义与认识[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2014,24(4):27-32 CUI Tei-jun,MA Yun-dong. Definition and understand on size set domain and cut set domain based on multi-dimensional space fault tree[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2014,24(4):27-32
[14]崔铁军,马云东. 基于多维空间事故树的维持系统可靠性方法研究[J]. 系统科学与数学,2014,34(6):682-692 CUI Tei-jun, MA Yun-dong. Research on the maintenance method of system reliability based on multi-dimensional space fault tree[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences,2014,34(6):682-692
[15]崔铁军, 马云东. 考虑范围属性的系统安全分类决策规则研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(11):6-9 CUI Tie-jun, MA Yun-dong. System security classification decision rules considering the Scope attribute[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014,10(11):6-9
[16]崔铁军,马云东. 宏观因素影响下的系统中元件重要性研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2014,44(18):124-131 CUI Tie-jun, MA Yun-dong. Research on the importance element in the system under the influence of the macro factors[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2014,44(18):124-131

相似文献/References:

[1]崔〓磊,杨宝贵,郭海龙,等.煤矿高浓度胶结充填系统可靠性评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(10):120.
 CUI Lei,YANG Bao gui,GUO Hai long,et al.Research on reliability evaluation of highlyconcentration cemented filling system in coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(6):120.
[2]杨虹霞,孙有仙.事故树定性分析法在实际运用中存在的问题[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):203.
 YANG Hong-xia,SUN You-xian.Problems of fault tree analysis in practical application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):203.
[3]邓军,杨一帆,翟小伟.基于层次分析法的矿井煤自燃危险性模糊评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.021]
 DENG Jun,YANG Yi fan,ZHAI Xiao wei.Fuzzy evaluation on risk of coal spontaneous combustion based on AHP[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(6):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.021]
[4]魏亚兴,吴超,胡汉华.近十年我国安全系统工程学发展研究综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):162.
 WEI Ya-xing,WU Chao,HU Han-hua.Review of Studies on Safety System Engineering in Recent Decade in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):162.
[5]李莎莎,崔铁军,马云东,等.SFT下的云化故障概率分布变化趋势研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(3):60.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.03.011]
 LI Shasha,CUI Tiejun,MA Yundong,et al.Research on change trend of cloudization fault probability distribution in SFT[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(6):60.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.03.011]
[6]何汉平.油气井井筒系统可靠性评价方法与应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(2):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.022]
 HE Hanping.Evaluation method of wellbore system reliability for oil and gas wells and its application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(6):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.022]
[7]崔铁军,李莎莎.现代系统安全观点分析及分层安全模型研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(9):24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.004]
 CUI Tiejun,LI Shasha.Analysis of modern system safety ideas and research on hierarchical safety model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(6):24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.09.004]
[8]李莎莎,崔铁军.系统操作者与管理者行为的博弈演化与收益分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(8):172.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.08.027]
 LI Shasha,CUI Tiejun.Game evolution and profit analysison behavior of system operators and managers[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(6):172.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.08.027]
[9]周夏伊,刘慧,陈林,等.油气集输站场失效可能性定量评价方法研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(6):167.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.025]
 ZHOU Xiayi,LIU Hui,CHEN Lin,et al.Study on quantitative evaluation method for failure possibility of oil and gas gathering and transportation station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(6):167.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.06.025]
[10]崔铁军,李莎莎.多因素影响下系统故障预防的多方案比选方法研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(7):226.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.033]
 CUI Tiejun,LI Shasha.Research on multi-scheme comparison and selection method of system fault prevention under influence of multiple factors[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(6):226.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.033]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(61350003)
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-06-30