[1]黄志强,谭智勇,谢豆,等.腐蚀管道评价标准ASME B31G-2009和SY/T6151-2009对比[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):116-122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.019]
HUANG Zhi-qiang,TAN Zhi-yong,XIE Dou,et al.Contrastive study on evaluation standards ASME B31G-2009
and SY/T6151-2009 for pipeline corrosion[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(4):116-122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.019]
点击复制
腐蚀管道评价标准ASME B31G-2009和SY/T6151-2009对比
HUANG Zhi-qiang,TAN Zhi-yong,XIE Dou,et al.Contrastive study on evaluation standards ASME B31G-2009 and SY/T6151-2009 for pipeline corrosion[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(4):116-122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.019]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 11
- 期数:
- 2015年4期
- 页码:
- 116-122
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2015-04-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Contrastive study on evaluation standards ASME B31G-2009 and SY/T6151-2009 for pipeline corrosion
- 分类号:
- X913
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 腐蚀是油气管道最常见的失效形式之一，对腐蚀管道进行剩余强度评价是保障管道安全可靠运行的基础工作。ASME B31G-2009和SY/T6151-2009是国内外的两种主流评价标准的最新版本，为了在选取适当的评价标准时有判断依据，比较分析了新版标准评价结果的保守程度，研究了评价流程、计算模型和计算参数取值等方面，并结合爆破试验数据和有限元仿真结果进行了验证。结果表明，两种标准仍具有一定的保守性，且当管道强度等级、腐蚀情况及数据资料完整度等不同时，两种标准有各自的适用范围和优缺点。
- Abstract:
- Corrosion is one of the most common failure forms of oil and gas pipelines, residual strength evaluation for corroded pipelines is the basic work to ensure the pipeline being safe and reliable. The ASME B31G-2009 and SY/T6151-2009 are the new versions of current mainstream evaluation standards for corrosion defects of pipelines. In order to provide a judgment basis for personnel to select the appropriate evaluation standards, the conservative degree of the evaluation results by two standards were compared and analyzed through studying the evaluation process, calculation model and value taking of calculation parameters. Finally, the evaluation results were verified based on the blasting test data and the finite element simulation results. The results showed that, to some extent, the new versions of these standards are conservative to corrosion pipelines. And both the standards have their own application scope and advantages and disadvantages when the pipeline strength grade, corrosion status or data integrity are different.
参考文献/References:
［1］闫东东.埋地原油腐蚀管道的剩余强度评价［J］.电子测试,2014,(4): 158-160
YAN Dong-dong. Remaining Strength Assessment for Corroded Buried Crude Oil Pipelines［J］. Electronic Test,2014,(4): 158-160
［2］何仁洋,修长征等.油气管道检测与评价［M］.北京:中国石化出版社,2009: 191-198
［3］ASME B31G-2009, Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines［S］. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
［4］SY/T6151-2009,钢制管道管体腐蚀损伤评价方法［S］.2009
［5］马彬,帅健等.新版ASME B31G—2009管道剩余强度评价标准先进性分析［J］. 天然气业,2011,(8):112-115,140-141
MA Bin, SHUAI Jian. Advances in the newest version of ASME B31G-2009［J］. Natural Gas Industry, 2011,(8):112-115 ,140-141
［6］喻西崇,胡永全,赵金洲,邬亚玲.腐蚀管道的剩余强度计算方法研究［J］.力学学报,2004,(3):281-287
YU Xi-chong, HU Yong-quan,ZHAO Jin-zhou,et al. A study of calculating methods for residual strength of corrosion pipelines［J］.Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2004,(3):281-287
［7］赵新伟,罗金恒等.管线钢断裂和疲劳裂纹扩展特性研究［J］.石油学报,2003, (5):108-112
ZHAO Xin-wei,LUO Jin–heng, et al.Characteristics of fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth of steel pipeline［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003,(5):108- 112
［8］Bin Ma,Jian Shuai,Dexu Liu,Kui Xu. Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects ［J］.Engineering Failure Analysis,2013; 32:209-219
［9］Ahammed M,et al.Reliability estimation of pressureised piping subject to local coosion defects［J］,Int.J.Pres.Ves.&Piping, Vol.69:20-22,1996
［10］帅健,张春娥,陈福来.非线性有限元法用于腐蚀管道失效压力预测［J］.石油学报,2008,(6):933-937
SHUAI Jian, ZHANG Chun’e,CHEN Fu-lai. Prediction of failure pressure in corroded pipelines based on non -linear finite element analysis［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,06: 933 -937
［11］Freire J L F,Vieira R D,Benjamin A C. Part 1:experimental techniques in the field of pipeline integrity［J］.Experimental Techniques,2006,30(4): 44-50
［12］Freire J L F,Vieira R D,Castro J T P,et al.Part 3:burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss［J］. Experimental Techniques,2006,30(6): 60-65
［13］Cronin D S.Pick R J.Prediction of the failure pressure for complex corrosion defects［J］.International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2002,79(4): 279-287
［14］BEDAIRI B,CRONIN D A,HOSSEINI A Plumtree.Failure prediction for crack-in-corrosion defects in natural gas transmission pipelines［J］.International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2012, 96/97:90-99
［15］XU L Y，CHENG Y F．Reliability and failure pressure prediction of various grades of pipeline steel in the presence of corrosion defects and pre-strain［J］. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2012,89:75-84
相似文献/References:
[1]张晓,帅健.基于FITNET FFS模型的腐蚀管道失效概率敏感性分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(8):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.08.013]
ZHANG Xiao,SHUAI Jian.Sensitivity analysis on failure probability of corroded pipeline based on FITNET FFS model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(4):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.08.013]
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- -
