|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]关丽,刘德俊,周志强.天然气管道泄漏爆炸实验分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):40-45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.007]
　GUAN Li,LIU De-jun,ZHOU Zhi-qiang.Experimental analysis on leakage and explosion of natural gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(12):40-45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.007]
点击复制

天然气管道泄漏爆炸实验分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年12期
页码:
40-45
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2014-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experimental analysis on leakage and explosion of natural gas pipeline
作者:
关丽;  刘德俊;  周志强
（辽宁石油化工大学 石油天然气工程学院，辽宁抚顺113001）
Author(s):
GUAN Li;  LIU De-jun;  ZHOU Zhi-qiang
(College of petroleum engineering, Liaoning Shihua University, Fushun Liaoning 113001, China)
关键词:
天然气管道; 泄漏; 爆炸; 评价模型; 实验
Keywords:
natural gas pipeline;  leakage;  explosion;  evaluation model;  experiment
分类号:
X932
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
天然气管道失效造成泄漏爆炸给周围人员带来非常严重的危害，对其危害范围的研究对输气管道设计和运行具有重要的意义。常见的天然气管道泄漏爆炸伤害半径计算方法有蒸气云爆炸(VCE)定量评价模型、TNO多能法评价模型、API pub 581定量后果评价模型和炸药爆炸经验公式。为验证不同评价模型在受限空间的预测效果，利用天然气爆炸试验台进行了受限空间爆炸实验，得到最大压强与距离经验关系，计算出天然气浓度为7%、9%和11%情况下爆炸死亡半径。计算结果与不同经验模型预测结果比较，表明当天然气浓度为7%~11%时，蒸气云爆炸(VCE)定量评价模型和炸药爆炸经验模型与实验结果最为接近，误差分别为-113%和189%，TNO多能法评价模型和API pub 581定量后果评价模型预测结果偏小。结论对有限空间天然气管道爆炸研究具有实际意义。
Abstract:
Failure of natural gas pipeline can lead to various outcomes and some of which would bring disaster to personnel safety. So it is important to investigate the damage range for design and operation of gas pipeline. The common gas explosion evaluation models for damage radius calculation include Vapor Cloud Explosion (VCE) model, TNO multi-energy method evaluation model, API pub 581 quantitative evaluation model and dynamite explosion empirical formula. Experimental research was carried out with gas explosion experimental platform to validate the prediction effect in confined space by four empirical models. The correlation between maximum pressure and explosion distances was obtained, and the dead-zone radius was calculated when the natural gas concentration was 9%, 7% and 11% respectively. The calculation results were compared with the prediction results of various empirical models, and it showed that VCE and explosion empirical formula, which were better agreed with experimental data than the others models, had deviations of -11.3% and 18.9% respectively, while TNO multi-energy method evaluation model and API pub 581 quantitative evaluation model had lower prediction results. It has practical significance for study on explosion of natural gas pipeline in confined space.

参考文献/References:

［1］YANG Xiang-lian. The leakage detection technique of natural gas pipeline and countermeasures. Energy Technology, 2005, 26(6): 248-250
［2］Stacy Nelson, Total E&P UK, Margaret Caulfield, etc. The Use of QRA To Inform the Design of a High-Pressure Onshore Pipeline［J］. Society of Petroleum Engineers,2008, 9: 1-12
［3］董绍华, 杨祖佩. 全球油气管道完整性技术与管理的最新进展［J］. 油气储运, 2007, 26(2): 1-7 DONG Shao-hua, YANG Zu-pei. The latest developments of the integrity and management technology of global oil & gas pipeline ［J］. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2007, 26(2): 1-7
［4］王保群, 林燕红, 焦中良. 我国天然气管道现状与发展方向［J］. 国际石油经济, 2013, 8: 76-79 WANG Bao-qun, LIN Yan-hong, JIAO Zhong-liang. The Development Status and direction of China's Natural Gas Pipeline［J］. International Petroleum Economics, 2013, 8: 76-79
［5］胡忆沩. 天然气管道泄漏分析及动态处理技术［J］. 天然气工业,2001, 21(4):98-100 HU Yi-wei. The analysis of natural gas pipeline leakage and dynamic processing technology［J］. Natural Gas Industry, 2001, 21(4):98-100
［6］晏玉婷, 张赫然,李俊明,等. 中压天然气管道泄漏扩散模拟研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014,10(5): 5-10 YAN Yu-ting, ZHANG He-ran, LI Jun-ming, et al. Simulations on diffusion of natural gas in the soil for medium-pressure gas pipeline leak［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014,10(5): 5-10
［7］董刚, 唐维维, 杜春,等. 高压管道天然气泄漏扩散过程的数值模拟［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009,5(6): 11-16 DONG Gang, TANG Wei-wei, DU Chun, et al. Numerical simulations of release and dispersion process from high-pressure natural gas pipeline［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009,5(6): 11-16
［8］梁瑞, 张春燕, 姜峰, 等. 天然气管道泄漏爆炸后果评价模型对比分析［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(8): 131-135 LIANG Rui, ZHANG Chun-yan, JIANG Feng, et al. Comparative analysis of evaluation on models for explosion consequence caused by leakage of natural gas pipelines［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17 (8): 131-135
［9］常亮, 帅健, 周晓亮, 等. 天然气长输管道泄漏爆炸后果评价［J］. 油气储运,2011,30(3): 161-165 CHANG Liang, SHUAI Jian, ZHOU Xiao-liang, et al. Consequence evaluation of Natural gas pipeline leakage and Explosion［J］. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2011,30(3): 161-165
［10］张冀东. 天然气管道泄漏爆炸后果的定量分析［J］. 内蒙古石油化工, 2012,3(14): 66-67 ZHANG Ji-dong.Quantitative analysis of the consequences of the natural gas pipeline leakage and explosion［J］.Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2012, 3(14): 66-67
［11］Y.-D.Jo, B.J.Ahn. Analysis of hazard areas associated with high-pressure natural-gas pipelines［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2002, (15): 179-188
［12］秦政先. 天然气管道泄漏扩散及爆炸数值模拟研究［D］. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2007: 7-8
［13］蔡增基, 龙天渝. 流体力学泵与风机(第四版)［M］. 中国建筑工业出版社, 1999:12
［14］黄斌, 刘扬, 傅程, 等. LPG储罐的蒸气云爆炸后果模拟［J］. 内蒙古石油化工, 2008, (19): 29-31 HUANG Bin, LIU Yang ,Fu Cheng , et al. Consequence simulation of vapor c loud explosion in LPG storage tank［J］. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2008,(19): 29-31
［15］傅智敏, 黄金印, 臧娜. 爆炸冲击波伤害破坏作用定量分析［J］. 消防科学与技术,2009, 28(6): 390-395 FU Zhi-min, HUANG Jin-yin, ZANG Na. Quantitative analysis for consequence of explosion shock wave［J］. Fire Science and Technology, 2009, 28(6): 390-395
［16］Center for Chemical Process Safety. Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires, and BLEVEs ［M］. New York: American Institute for Chemical Engineers, 1994
［17］郑津洋, 马夏康, 尹谢平. 长输管道安全风险辨识评价控制［M］. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004
［18］Henry Ozog,Georges A Melhem,Arthur D Little,et al.Facility siting-case study demonstrating benefit of analyzing blast dynamics ［C］. International Conference and Work-shop on Process Safety Management and Inherently Safer Processes.New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1996: 293-315
［19］American Petroleum Institute Risk-Based Inspection Base Resource Document, API pub 581［S］. First Edition, 2002
［20］Jo Y.D., Ahn B.J.. Analysis of hazard are as associated with high pressure natural gas pipelines［J］. Journal of Loss Preconvention the Process Industries, 2002, 15(3): 179-188
［21］Yuhu D, Huilin G, Jing Z, et al. Mathematical modeling of gas release through holes in pipelines［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 92(1-3): 237-241第10卷第12期2014年12月中 国 安 全 生 产 科 学 技 术Journal of Safety Science and TechnologyVol.10 No.12Dec. 2014

相似文献/References:

[1]宋祎昕,姚安林,蒋宏业,等.天然气管道水平定向钻穿越事故及其后果分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):118.
　Song Yi-xin,Yao An-lin,Jiang Hong-ye,et al.Analysis of Accidents and the Results During Natural Gas Pipeline Horizontal Directed Drilling[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):118.
[2]高少华,邹兵,严龙,等.含硫天然气净化厂硫化氢泄漏分析及对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(2):174.
　GAO Shao hua,ZOU Bing,YAN Long,et al.Study of hydrogen sulfide leakage and dispersion in sour gas purification plants and countermeasures[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):174.
[3]王文和,徐志胜,易俊,等.天然气管道泄漏火球事故后果模拟评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(1):18.
　WANG Wen-he,XU Zhi-sheng,YI Jun,et al.Consequences evaluation of fireball accidents made by leakage of natural gas pipelines[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):18.
[4]吕〓奎,何华刚,王耀琪.天然气管道应急体系网络结构优化分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):71.
　LV Kui,HE Hua gang,WANG Yao qi.Optimal analysis on network structure for emergency system of natural gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):71.
[5]岳〓忠,张月山.电站锅炉管件失效泄漏原因分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):150.
　YUE Zhong,ZHANG Yue shan.Cause analysis of leakage by tube failure of power station boiler[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):150.
[6]谢昱姝,吴宗之,吕良海,等.城市管道天然气在土壤中泄漏扩散实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(4):13.
　XIE Yu shu,WU Zong zhi,L Liang hai,et al.Experimental research on diffusion behavior of leaked gas from underground gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):13.
[7]庞〓磊,,吕良海,等.密闭空间燃气泄漏爆炸危险区域迁移规律[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):47.
　PANG Lei,LV Liang hai,et al.Migration laws of hazardous zone for natural gas leakage explosion in enclosed spaces[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):47.
[8]郭庆妮,邓顺熙,江鸿宾,等.基于TZS法分析天然气管道运输的个人风险[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(11):113.
　GUO Qing ni,DENG Shun xi,JIANG Hong bin,et al.Assessment of individual risk for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas based on TZS method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):113.
[9]王学岐,韩兆辉,宋丹青.基于CFD的液化气罐区泄漏爆炸事故后果模拟[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):64.
　WANG Xue qi,HAN Zhao hui,SONG Dan qing.Simulation on leakage explosion consequence of LPG tank farms based on CFD[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(12):64.
[10]程民生.火电厂脱硝工程液氨泄漏事故风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):140.
　CHENG Min sheng.Risk analysis of the liquid ammonia leakage accident in the DeNOx system of themal power plant[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(12):140.
[11]李朝阳,马贵阳,徐柳.架空及埋地天然气管道泄漏扩散数值研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):66.
　LI Zhao-yang,MA Gui-yang,XU Liu.The numerical study of the diffusion concentration on buried and Overhead[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):66.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-12-30