|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]黄文君,石宁,王犇,等.硝基苯精馏再沸器安全分析与评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):123-129.
　HUANG Wen-jun,SHI Ning,WANG Ben,et al.Safety analysis and evaluation of reboiler in nitrobenzene rectification unit[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):123-129.
点击复制

硝基苯精馏再沸器安全分析与评估()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年6期
页码:
123-129
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2011-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Safety analysis and evaluation of reboiler in nitrobenzene rectification unit
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-06-0123-07
作者:
黄文君1; 2; 石宁2; 王犇1; 谢传欣2; 张海峰2
1.青岛科技大学环境与安全工程学院，青岛? 266042
2.化学品安全控制国家重点实验室，青岛? 266071
Author(s):
HUANG Wen-jun1; 2;  SHI Ning2;  WANG Ben1;  XIE Chuan-xin2;  ZHANG Hai-feng2
1. College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao?University of Science and Technology, Qingdao? 266042, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Chemicals Safety & Control, Qingdao? 266071, China
关键词:
硝基苯精馏再沸器; 安全评估; ICI蒙德法; 事故树分析法（FTA）; 总危险等级
Keywords:
reboiler nitrobenzene rectification;  safety evaluation;  ICI’s Mond method;  Fault Tree Analysis (FTA);  overall hazard rating
分类号:
X937;X928.7
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了明确硝基苯精馏再沸器装置爆炸事故发生的原因,有针对性的采取预防措施,综合运用英国帝国化学工业公司的IC I蒙德评价法和事故树分析(FTA)法对精馏再沸器进行安全分析研究,确定了该装置生产过程中的物料物质系数,计算相关的物质危险性、工艺危险性和毒性指数,经过安全措施补偿系数修正后,得出了硝基苯精馏再沸器总危险性系数和危险等级;定性地分析了各危险因素的大小;定量地得出装置的危险程度,并提出了安全措施。结果表明,该装置的危险等级属中等,高温下漏入空气、阀门失效和法兰密封不严是导致该事故的3个最主要的原因,因此,应从以上几方面采取措施,加强安全生产管理。控制精馏再沸器的加热温度,防止局部积累热量,从而降低危险等级,确保安全生产。
Abstract:
The explosions of the reboiler in the rectifying unit of nitrobenzene processes occurred frequently. For figuring out the general causes and taking effective countermeasures for prevent such damages, ICI’ (Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd.) Mond Assessment and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) are used to carry out hazard analysis. A series of hazard indices are calculated for the process unit on the basis of material factors, process hazards, and toxicities, etc. Offsetting factors for various forms of special protections are then applied and final adjusted values of these indices indicating the overall hazard rating of the unit are calculated. Then the minimal cut and radius sets are calculated by qualitative analysis. Furthermore, the critical importance of the basic events is calculated by quantitative analysis. Finally, the safety measures are put forward. The results of the investigation show that: the rank of the danger of the unit is medium category; air ingress at high temperature, valve failure and flange sealing failure are the most important three causes for such explosion incidents. So relative countermeasures are needed for management enhance on work safety, and controlling heating temperature and avoiding local heat accumulation in the reboiler can also lower the hazard class and ensure work safety.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘铁民, 张兴凯, 刘功智.安全评价方法应用指南[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005.2: 178-221LIU Tie-min, ZHANG Xing-kai, LIU Gong-zhi. Guide of Safety Assessment Application [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005.2: 178-221[2] 宋文娟, 赵东风. 基于蒙德法的丙烯腈装置安全评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2009,16（4）: 85-88 SONG Wen-juan, ZHAO Dong-feng. Safety Assessment of Acrylonitrile Units Based on Mond Method [J]. Safety and Enviromental Engineering, 2009, 16(4): 85-88[3] 汪元辉.安全系统工程[M].天津: 天津大学出版社, 2006.2: 118-197WANG Yuan-hui. Safety system engineering [M].Tianjin: Tianjin University Press, 2006.2: 118-197[4] 杜喜臣, 蔡敏琦. 液氨泄漏事故树分析及风险预测[J]. 环境工程学报, 2008, 2（10）: 1430-1432DU Xi-chen,CAI Min-qi. Ammonia leakage fault tree analysis and risk forecast [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 2(10): 1430-1432[5] 曹怀庆. 液化油管工艺危害识别及液氨槽事故树分析[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2005, 1（8）: 27-29CAO Huai-qing. Hazard Identification of Nitri- dation Oil Tube Technology and Fault Tree Analysis on Ammonia Tank [J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2005, 31(8): 27-29[6] 索丰平, 王苏芳. 事故树分析应用研究[J]. 山西建筑, 2007, 33（20）: 214-215SUO Feng-ping, WANG Su-fang. Compile fault tree analysis and application study [J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2007, 33(20): 214-215[7] 张军, 周晶, 卢振勇. 事故树分析方法在建筑施工模板坍塌中的应用[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报, 2007, 26（5）: 706-708ZHANG Jun, ZHOU Jing, LU Zhen-yong. Application of fault tree analysis in formwork collapse accident in construction [J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2007, 26(5): 706-708[8] 李卫明. 硝基苯精制再沸器爆炸事故的探讨[J].化学工业与工程技术，2007,28（4）：54-57LI Wei-ming. Discussion on explosion accident of reboiler in nitrobenzene refinement[J].Journal of Chemical Industry & Engineering,2007,28(4):54-57[9] Diven J. Griffing D. Thorpe A. et al. Fault Tree Analysis System User’s Guide [R].CSC-RL-SCI-122.June 26,1975[10] Faisal I.Khan S. A. Abbasi. Model for Domino Effect Analysis in Chemical Process Industries[J].Process Safety Program,1998, Vol.17:107-122[11] 俞树荣, 葛菊花. 浮头式换热器故障树的建立[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2007, 3(6): 126-129 YU Shu-rong, GE Ju-hua. The establishing of the fault tree of floating head exchanger [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2007, 3(6): 126-129[12] 张春光, 肖占敏, 周峰等. 碳四抽提装置火灾的事故树法分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5(5): 200-203 ZHANG Chun-guang, XIAO Zhan-min, ZHOU Feng, etc. Fault tree analysis of one fire accident in the butadiene extraction plant [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(5): 200-203

相似文献/References:

[1]吴岩.生产作业区重大危险源评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):158.
　WU Yan.Research on method of major hazard assessment on production operations area[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(6):158.
[2]向卫国,徐玉胜.地铁施工引起地下管线变形的安全评估方法及其应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):87.
　XIANG Wei guo,XU Yu sheng.Security assessment method for the deformation of underground pipeline caused by the subway construction and its application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(6):87.
[3]陈勇刚.我国通用航空安全管理体系建设研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(6):216.
　CHEN Yong gang.Study on safety management system of general aviation in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(6):216.
[4]智会强,路世昌,郭伟,等.基于CFD仿真分析的大型运动会主火炬塔安全评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(11):124.
　ZHI Hui qiang,LU Shi chang,GUO Wei,et al.Safety assessment on torch tower of large games based on CFD simulation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(6):124.
[5]陈华群,余 娟.基于改进贝叶斯的飞行签派安全评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):109.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.019]
　CHEN Huaqun,YU Juan.Research on safety assessment of flight dispatch based on improved Bayesian[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(6):109.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.019]
[6]马茂冬,韩尧,张倩.基于模糊层次分析法的应急能力评估方法探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(2):98.
　MA Mao dong,HAN Yao,ZHANG Qian.Evaluation method of emergency response capabilities based on FAH[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(6):98.
[7]祝磊,彭建和,刘金龙.地铁车站深基坑建设对邻近建筑物安全的影响评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.013]
　ZHU Lei,PENG Jian-he,LIU Jin-long.Evaluation on influence by construction of deep foundation pit in subway station to safety of adjacent buildings[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(6):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.013]
[8]付冉,姚安林,武明明,等.水网地区漂浮输气管道安全评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):68.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.012]
　FU Ran,YAO An-lin,WU Ming-ming,et al.Study on method for safety assessment of floating gas pipeline in river-network areas[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(6):68.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.012]
[9]席学军,史聪灵,代德军.基于动态毒性负荷的人员疏散安全评估方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(5):170.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.05.029]
　XI Xuejun,SHI Congling,DAI Dejun.Assessment method of personnel evacuation safety based on dynamic toxic load[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(6):170.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.05.029]
[10]张士超.海洋石油平台吊艇架结构安全评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(8):101.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.08.016]
　ZHANG Shichao.Safety assessment on davit structure of offshore oil platform[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(6):101.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.08.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2010-12-13
更新日期/Last Update: