|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]田玉敏,蔡晶菁.建筑火灾风险指数法权重确定*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(5):46-49.
 TIAN Yu min,CAI Jing jing.Study on weightquantifying methods for indexes in risk evaluation of building fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(5):46-49.
点击复制

建筑火灾风险指数法权重确定*()
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
5
期数:
2009年5
页码:
46-49
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on weightquantifying methods for indexes in risk evaluation of building fire
文章编号:
1673-193X(2009)-05-0046-04
作者:
田玉敏1蔡晶菁2
1.中国人民武装警察部队学院消防工程系2.中国人民武装警察部队学院 研究生队
Author(s):
TIAN Yumin1 CAI Jingjing2
1.Department of Fire Engineering,the Armed Police Force Academy2.Team of Graduate Student,the Armed Police Force Academy
关键词:
火灾指数法风险评价评价指标体系层次分析权重
Keywords:
fire risk index methodrisk evaluation evaluation index system Analysis Hierarchy Process weight
分类号:
X928.7;FB40.64
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
建筑火灾风险指数法中指标权重的确定是一个关键技术问题。本文探讨了基于的AHP的评价指标权重的确定方法,通过专家调查表的形式,邀请40位相关专家评分,通过层次分析法建立判断矩阵,对判断矩阵的计算借助软件Yaahp 041,得出各位专家的权重值,再采用算术平均法求专家组的综合结果,从而得出总体累计权重的分布。研究结果为厘定火灾保险费率提供依据,为制定财产保险火灾风险评价标准提供技术上的支持,将填补我国在该领域的空白。
Abstract:
Weightquantifying method for index is a key technique in risk evaluation of building fire . The paper discussed how to determine the weights on the basis of AHP. By questionnaires of 40 experts who have been invited to give marks, the judging matrixes were built. By software of Yaahp 041, a set of weights were calculated for a piece of questionnaire, and comprehensive results were given by arithmetic average method, then the total cumulative weights were obtained. The research will give some guides to ratemaking in fire insurance, and provide technical assistance for criteriamaking of fire risk evaluation. All the research are essential to fill the blank in China.

参考文献/References:

[1]范维澄,等.火灾风险评估方法学[M],北京:科学出版社,2004FAN Weicheng, et al. Fire Risk Assessment, Beijing:Science Press, 2004[2]许谨良.风险管理[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007XUN Jinliang. Risk management, Shanghai:Shanghai Finance University Press, 2007[3]Gregory A.Norris and Harold E.Marshall. Multiattribute Decision Analysis Method for Evaluating Buildings and Building Systems[EB]. http://www.google.com/. 2003.10[4]李洁.精算学原理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006LI Jie. Actuarial Science Principle, Beijing:Qing Hua University Press, 2006[5]孙金华.火灾风险与保险.北京:科学出版社,2007SUN Jinhua. Fire Risk and Insurance, Beijing:Science Press, 2007第5卷第5期2009年10月中 国 安 全 生 产 科 学 技 术Journal of Safety Science and TechnologyVol.5 No.5Oct.2009文章编号:1673-193X(2009)-05-0050-05

相似文献/References:

[1]许红军,田俊改.支线机场安全动态预警技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):123.
 XU Hong-jun,TIAN Jun-gai.Dynamic hazard identification and evaluation techniques for regional airport safety and security[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):123.
[2]张晓,张钢.船上劳动安全风险辨识研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):161.
 ZHANG Xiao,ZHANG Gang.A study on risk identification of shipboard working safety[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):161.
[3]王长建,陈刚.风险因子模糊评价法在钻机安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):149.
 WANG Chang-jian,CHEN Gang.The Applications of Risk Factor Fuzzy Evaluation Method(RFEM)to Risk Assessment of Drilling Rig[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):149.
[4]石荣,李明捷.变权综合法在航空公司风险评价中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):143.
 SHI Rong,LI Ming-jie.Application of variable weight synthetic evaluation method in safety assessment of SMS of civil aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):143.
[5]巫志鹏,白永忠,林景喜.新化工装置风险评价方法的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):154.
 WU Zhi-peng,BAI Yong-zhong,LIN Jing-xi.Study on the methods of hazard risk assessment for new facilities[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):154.
[6]徐吉辉,姜帆,张亮.基于SEFA的现役装备改进风险评价指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):53.
 XU Ji hui,JIANG Fan,ZHANG Liang.Research on evaluation index system of active equipment improvement risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(5):53.
[7]张蒙,冯福亮.成品油库临时性常规作业管理现状分析及改进措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(11):216.
 ZHANG Meng,FENG Fu liang.Present situation analysis and improvement measurement for management of the occasional conventional operation in oil tankfarm[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(5):216.
[8]高旭,张圣柱,杨国梁,等.风险沟通研究进展综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):148.
 GAO Xu,ZHANG Sheng-zhu,YANG Guo-liang,et al.Overview on reseach status of risk communication[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):148.
[9]汪长永,杨卫,殷焕召,等.模糊综合评价法在油气管道跨越工程风险评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):143.
 WANG Chang-yong,YANG Wei,YIN Huan-zhao,et al.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in risk evaluation of pipeline crossing engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):143.
[10]王文和,易俊,沈士明.基于风险的城市埋地燃气管道安全评价模型及应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):163.
 WANG Wen-he,YI Jun,SHEN Shi-ming.Safety evaluation model and application for the urban buried gas pipeline based on risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(5):163.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2009-06-28作者简介:田玉敏,女,博士,教授。*基金项目:(推荐性国家标准)《财产保险火灾风险评价指南》(编号:20074808-T-312);公安理论及软科学研究计划(编号:2007LLYJWJXY085)
更新日期/Last Update: