|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]崔光耀,魏杭杭,宁茂权,等.城市浅埋矩形隧道减震层厚度对减震效果的影响分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(8):137-142.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.022]
　CUI Guangyao,WEI Hanghang,NING Maoquan,et al.Analysis on influence of thickness of shock absorption layer on shock absorption effect of urban shallowburied rectangular tunnel[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(8):137-142.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.022]
点击复制

城市浅埋矩形隧道减震层厚度对减震效果的影响分析*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
16
期数:
2020年8期
页码:
137-142
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2020-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on influence of thickness of shock absorption layer on shock absorption effect of urban shallowburied rectangular tunnel
文章编号:
1673-193X(2020)-08-0137-06
作者:
崔光耀; 魏杭杭; 宁茂权; 张建军
（1.北方工业大学 土木工程学院，北京 100144；
2.中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司，湖北 武汉 430063；
3.中国市政工程华北设计研究总院有限公司，天津 300051）
Author(s):
CUI Guangyao;  WEI Hanghang;  NING Maoquan;  ZHANG Jianjun
(1.School of Civil Engineering,North China University of Technology,Beijing 100144,China;
2.China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan Hubei 430063,China;
3.China Municipal Engineering North China Design & Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300051,China)
关键词:
城市矩形隧道; 浅埋; 双连拱; 减震层; 减震效果
Keywords:
urban rectangular tunnel;  shallow burial;  double arch;  shock absorption layer;  shock absorption effect
分类号:
X947;U452.2+8
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究减震层厚度对减震效果的影响，以某城市浅埋双连拱矩形隧道工程为例，利用数值模拟软件ABAQUS对比分析50,100,150 mm 3种厚度减震层的减震效果。结果表明：施设50 mm厚减震层时，边墙收敛减小14.90%，最大、最小主应力最大值分别减小13.96%和9.59%，最大剪应力减小3.22%，最小安全系数最小提高23.13%；施设100 mm厚减震层时，边墙收敛减小6.63%，最大、最小主应力分别减小14.70%和11.90%，最大剪应力减小4.56%，最小安全系数最小提高41.39%；施设150 mm厚减震层时，边墙收敛减小4.65%，最大、最小主应力最大值减小幅度较大，其中最小主应力最大值减小了14.03%，最大剪应力减小6.17%，最小安全系数最小提高42.72%；施设100 mm厚减震层优于50 mm和150 mm厚减震层。研究成果可为城市浅埋双连拱矩形隧道的减震设计提供参考。
Abstract:
In order to study the influence of the thickness of the shock absorbing layer on the shock absorbing effect,taking a shallow buried doublearch rectangular tunnel project in a city as an example,the numerical simulation software ABAQUS was used to compare and analyze the shock absorbing effect of three kinds of shock absorbing layers with the thickness of 50,100 and 150 mm.The results showed that when applying the shock absorption layer with the thickness of 50 mm,the side wall convergence decreased by 14.90%,the maximum of maximum and minimum principal stress decreased by 13.96% and 9.59%,respectively,the maximum shear stress decreased by 3.22%,and the minimum safety factor increased by 23.13% at least;When applying the shock absorption layer with the thickness of 100 mm,the side wall convergence decreased by 6.63%,the maximum of maximum and minimum principal stress decreased by 14.70% and 11.90%,respectively,the maximum shear stress decreased by 4.56%,and the minimum safety factor increased by 41.39% at least.When applying the shock absorption layer with the thickness of 150mm,the side wall convergence decreases by 4.65%, and the maximum of maximum and minimum principal stresses decrease by a large margin, among which the maximum minimum principal stresses decrease by 14.03%,the maximum shear stress decreased by 6.17%,and the minimum safety factor increased by 42.72% at least.The shock absorption layer with the thickness of 100 mm was better than those with the thickness of 50 mm and 150 mm.The research results can provide reference for the shock absorption design of urban shallowburied double arch rectangular tunnels.

参考文献/References:

［1］王帅帅,高波.隧道设置减震层减震机制研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报,2016，35(3)：592-603. WANG Shuaishuai,GAO Bo.Damping mechanism and shaking table test on mountain tunnel linings with buffer layers ［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2016,35 (3):592-603.
［2］THOMAS R K.Earthquake design criteria for subway［J］.Journal of the Structural Division,1969,6:1213-1231.
［3］赵旭,黎若寒,陶连金,等.松动圈及减震层对隧道地震响应影响的试验研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(S1):3310-3319. ZHAO Xu,LI Ruohan,TAO Lianjin,et al.Research on propagation law of cylindrical stress wave in jointed rock mass under in-situ stress［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2018,37(S1):3310-3319.
［4］王帅帅,高波,隋传毅,等.减震层减震原理及跨断层隧道减震技术振动台试验研究［J］.岩土工程学报,2015,37(6):1806-1092. WANG Shuaishuai,GAO Bo,SUI Chuanyi,et al.Mechanism of shock absorption layer and shaking table tests on shaking absorption technology of tunnel across fault［J］.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2015,37 (6):1806-1092.
［5］徐华,李天斌.隧道不同减震层的地震动力响应与减震效果分析［J］.土木工程学报,2011,44（S1）:201-208. XU Hua,LI Tianbin.Seismic dynamic response and damping effect analysis of different buffer layers on tunnels ［J］.China Civil Engineering Journal,2011,44（S1）:201-208.
［6］赵武胜,陈卫忠,马少森,等.泡沫混凝土隧道减震层减震机制［J］.岩土力学,2018,39(3):1027-1036. ZHAO Wusheng,CHEN Weizhong,MA Shaosen,et al.Isolation effect of foamed concrete layer on the seismic responses of tunnel［J］.Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,39(3):1027-1036.
［7］信春雷,高波,闫高明,等.跨走滑断层隧道地震破坏特征与抗减震措施研究［J］.振动工程学报,2016,29(4):694-703. XIN Chunlei,GAO Bo,YAN Gaoming,et al.Seismic damage characteristics and anti-seismic damping measures for tunnel across strike-slip faults ［J］.Journal of Vibration Engineering,2016,29 (4):694-703.
［8］耿萍,唐金良,权乾龙,等.穿越断层破碎带隧道设置减震层的振动台模型试验［J］.中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(6):2520-2526. GENG Ping,TANG Jinliang,QUAN Qianglong,et al.Shaking table test for tunnel with shock absorption layer though fault zone ［J］.Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44 (6):2520-2526.
［9］崔光耀,纪磊,荆鸿飞.高烈度艰险山区跨断层隧道减震层减震技术研究［J］.地震工程学报,2019,41(2):286-291. CUI Guangyao,JI Lei,JING Hongfei.Damping shake technology of the shock absorption layer of fault-crossing tunnels in a dangerous mountainous area with high-intensity earthquakes ［J］.China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2019,41 (2):286-291.
［10］信春雷,高波,周佳媚,等.跨断层隧道抗减震措施性能振动台试验研究［J］.岩土工程学报,2014,36(8):1414-1422. XIN Chunlei,GAO Bo,ZHOU Jiamei,et al.Shaking table tests on performances of anti-seismic and damping measures for fault-crossing tunnel structures ［J］.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2014,36 (8):1414-1422.
［11］方林,宋林俐.穿越断层破碎带隧道减震措施研究［J］.公路,2010 (2):194-197. FANG Ling,SONG Linli.Research on vibration-absorption measures of tunnels through fault ［J］.Highway,2010 (2):194-197.
［12］高文立,吕涛,杨明松.高烈度地震区山岭隧道设置减震层的地震动力响应及减震效果分析［J］.工程与建设,2018,32(3):371-376. GAO Wenli,LYU Tao,YANG Mingsong.Seismic dynamic response and damping effect analysis of the earthquake zone in the high intensity earthquake zone ［J］.Engineering and Construction,2018,32(3):371-376.
［13］朱正国,余剑涛,隋传毅,等.高烈度活断层地区隧道结构抗震的综合措施［J］.中国铁道科学，2014，35(6):55-62. ZHU Zhenguo,YU Jiantao,SUI Chuanyi,et al.Comprehensive seismic measures for tunnel structure in the area of high intensity active fault ［J］.China Railway Science,2014，35(6):55-62.
［14］王明年,崔光耀.高烈度地震区隧道设置减震层的减震原理研究［J］.土木工程学报,2011,44(8):126-131. WANG Mingnian,CUI Guangyao.Study of the mechanism of shock absorption layer in the supporting system of tunnels in highly seismic areas ［J］.China Civil Engineering Journal,2011,44 (8):126-131.
［15］重庆交通科研设计院．公路隧道设计规范 第一册土建工程:JTG 3370.1—2018［S］.北京:人民交通出版社，2018.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘玉德,闰守峰,张东升.浅埋薄基岩煤层短壁连采模式及应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(6):51.
　LIU Yu-de,YAN Shou-feng,ZHANG Dong-sheng.Study on the pattern and the application of short-wall continuous mechanical mining in shallow coal seam with thin bedrock[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(8):51.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2020-03-27
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目（51408008）；北京市青年拔尖人才培育计划项目（CIT&TCD201704013）；北京市属高校基本科研业务费项目（110052971921/061）；中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司重大科研项目（2020K107）
作者简介： 崔光耀，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程。
通信作者： 魏杭杭，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-10