[1]刘洋,段礼祥,钟龙,等.基于突变级数法的离心泵机组安全评价模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):155-160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.025]
LIU Yang,DUAN Lixiang,ZHONG Long,et al.Safety evaluation model of centrifugal pump unit based on catastrophe progression method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(11):155-160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.025]
点击复制
基于突变级数法的离心泵机组安全评价模型
LIU Yang,DUAN Lixiang,ZHONG Long,et al.Safety evaluation model of centrifugal pump unit based on catastrophe progression method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(11):155-160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.025]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 13
- 期数:
- 2017年11期
- 页码:
- 155-160
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2017-11-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Safety evaluation model of centrifugal pump unit based on catastrophe progression method
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2017)-11-0155-06
- Keywords:
- centrifugal pump; safety evaluation; catastrophe theory; catastrophe progression method; evaluation index system
- 分类号:
- X913.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为研究层次分析法在安全评价中权重确定受主观因素影响较大的问题，提出将突变理论和模糊数学相结合的突变级数评价模型。模型考虑离心泵机组的结构、故障模式及人员管理等因素建立多层次评价指标体系，并结合模糊数学确定底层指标的隶属函数矩阵；利用突变级数法对各指标进行标准化和归一化处理；将底层指标隶属函数矩阵逐级量化递归得到总突变隶属矩阵。研究结果表明：此离心泵机组的最大总突变隶属函数值达到了0.961 9，即为“良好”。但同时也发现第一级与第二级相差不大，说明只要采取一定的安全措施，就可提高此离心泵的安全性。分析结果与实际情况相符合。
- Abstract:
- In view of the problem that the weight determination of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in the safety evaluation is influenced by the subjective factors significantly, a catastrophe progression evaluation model was proposed by combining the catastrophe theory with the fuzzy mathematics. The model established a multi-level evaluation index system by considering the factors such as the structure and fault mode of the centrifugal pump unit, the personnel management and other factors, and the membership function matrix of the bottom indexes was determined by combining with the fuzzy mathematics. The standardization and normalization processing of each index was carried out by using the catastrophe progression method, then the total catastrophe membership matrix was obtained by the quantification and recursion on the membership function matrix of the bottom indexes layer by layer. This method could quantify the index weight according to the intrinsic mechanism of normalized formula in the catastrophe theory, and reduce the influence of human subjective factors. In the case analysis, the evaluation result of a certain centrifugal pump unit was "good", which was consistent with the actual situation.
参考文献/References:
［1］谢超. 油田注水采油系统的建模、优化与控制［D］. 天津：天津大学，2010.
［2］段礼祥，张来斌，钱永梅. AHP—模糊综合评价法在离心泵安全评价中的应用［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7(2)：127-131.
DUAN Lixiang，ZHANG Laibin，QIAN Yongmei. Application of fuzzy comprehension evaluation in safety assessment of centrifuge pump ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2011，7（2）：127-131.
［3］邓军,杨一帆,翟小伟. 基于层次分析法的矿井煤自燃危险性模糊评价［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术，2014，10(4)：120-125.
DENG Jun，YANG Yifan，ZHAI Xiaowei. Fuzzy evaluation on risk of coal spontaneous combustion based on AHP ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2014，10(4)：120-125.
［4］黄奕龙. 突变级数法在水资源持续利用评价中的应用［J］. 干旱环境监测，2001，15(3)：167-170.
HUANG Yilong.Application of catastrophe progression method to evaluation of sustainable usage of water resource［J］. Arid Environmental Monitoring，2001，15（3）：167-170.
［5］Ahmed K，Shahid S，Harun S B，et al. Assessment of groundwater potential zones in an arid region based on catastrophe theory［J］. Earth Science Informatics，2015，8(3)：539-549.
［6］陈秋玲，马晓姗，张青. 基于突变模型的我国食品安全风险评估［J］. 中国安全科学学报，2011，21(2)：152-158.
CHEN Qiuling，MA Xiaoshan，ZHANG Qing. Risk assessment of food safety in china based on catastrophe model［J］. China Safety Science Journal，2011，21（2）：152-158.
［7］刘华峰，李建兰，余辰，等. 非线性转子系统碰摩故障的突变性能分析［J］. 振动.测试与诊断，2012，32(6)：945-949，1035-1036.
LIU Huafeng，LI Jianlan，YU Chen，et al. Catastrophe performance analysis of rub-impact fault of nonlinear system ［J］. Journal of vibration，Measurement & Diagnosis，2012，32(6)：945-949，1035-1036.
［8］陈云峰，孙殿义，陆根法. 突变级数法在生态适宜度评价中的应用——以镇江新区为例［J］. 生态学报，2006，26(8)：2587-2593.
CHEN Yunfeng，SUN Dianyi，LU Genfa. Application of catastrophe progression method in ecological suitability assessment: A case study on Zhenjiang new area ［J］. ActaEcologicaSinica，2006，26(8)：2587-2593.
［9］Su S，Zhang Z，Xiao R，et al. Geospatial assessment of agroecosystem health: development of an integrated index based on catastrophe theory［J］. Stochastic Environmental Research & Risk Assessment，2012，26(3)：321-334.
［10］朱顺泉，徐国祥. 上市公司财务状况的突变级数评价模型及其实证研究［J］. 统计与信息论坛，2003，18(3)：11-14.
ZHU Shunquan，XU Guoxiang. Mutation series evaluation model of listed corporation financial status［J］. Statistics & Information Tribune，2003，18(3)：11-14.
［11］Sadeghfam S，Hassanzadeh Y，Nadiri A A，et al. Localization of groundwater vulnerability assessment using catastrophe theory［J］. Water Resources Management，2016，30（10）：1-17.
［12］翁钢民，鲁超. 基于突变级数法的旅游产业竞争力评价研究——以西北五省为例［J］. 软科学，2009，23(6)：57-61.
WENGGangmin，LU Chao. Research on tourism industry competitive power evaluation based on cpm-take the five provinces in northwestern china as an example ［J］.Soft Science，2009，23(6)：57-61.
［13］杨超.盾构机用大功率行星减速器模糊可靠性优化设计及仿真分析［D］.重庆：重庆大学，2011.
［14］董炜，陈卫征，徐晓滨，等.基于可分性测度的模糊隶属函数确定方法［J］.控制与决策，2014，29(11)：2089-2093.
DONG Wei，CHEN Weizheng，XU Xiaobin，et al. Determination method of fuzzy membership function based on separability measure ［J］. Control and Decision， 2014，29(11)：2089-2093.
［15］韩国明. 机械振动、冲击与状态监测标准化工作的国内外进展［A］. 中国力学学会、中国振动工程学会、中国航空学会、中国机械工程学会、中国宇航学会.第九届全国振动理论及应用学术会议论文集［C］.中国力学学会、中国振动工程学会、中国航空学会、中国机械工程学会、中国宇航学会，2007:7.
相似文献/References:
[1]汪送,王瑛,李超.BP神经网络在航空机务人员本质安全程度评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(6):35.
[2]金珠,马小平.基于核校准和SVM的煤矿安全组织管理因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):16.
JIN Zhu,MA Xiao-ping.Analysis of organizational administrative factors in coal mine safety based on kernel alignment and SVM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):16.
[3]陈杨,王为民,姜东方,等.基于故障树与灰色模糊理论的城市CNG加气站安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):123.
Chen Yang,Wang Wei-min,JIANG Dong-fang,et al.Safety Assessment of the CNG station in city based on the Faulty Tree and Fuzzy-grey Theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):123.
[4]吕显智,马建云,陶昆,等.基于模糊综合评价法的高层宾馆消防安全现状评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):138.
LV Xian-zhi,MA Jian-yun,TAO Kun,et al.Establish?of fire safety evaluation system for high-rise hotel using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):138.
[5]郭凯旋.PTA生产火灾爆炸危险性分析与评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):167.
GUO Kai-xuan.Analysis and Assessment on Fire & Explosion Risk for PTA Production[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):167.
[6]朱劭涌,曹雄,刘磊,等.糠醛厂生产过程安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):118.
ZHU Shao-yong,CAO Xiong,LIU Lei,et al.Safety Assessment on productive process in one furfural factory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):118.
[7]文华,钮英建.功能安全评估在安全评价中的应用体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):116.
WEN Hua NIU Ying-jian.Research on the Application of Functional Safety Assessment to Safety Evaluation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):116.
[8]李曌,王金安.高速公路工程道路交通安全评价研究及工程应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):120.
LI Zhao,WANG Jin-an.Study on evaluation of expressway traffic safety and engineering application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):120.
[9]谭东宁,于立友.关于在风电场安全评价中增加信息安全评价内容的建议[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):151.
Tan Dongning,Yu Liyou.Suggestions on the information security evaluation content increased the safety evaluation of wind power farms[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):151.
[10]张亦男,王佰顺.道化学指数评价法在淮化集团某合成氨厂的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):194.
ZHANG Yi-nan,WANG Bai-shun.Application of DOW’s F&EI method in ammonia plant of Anhui Huainan chemical group[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):194.
[11]段礼祥,张来斌,钱永梅.AHP—模糊综合评价法在离心泵安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):127.
DUAN Li xiang,ZHANG Lai bin,QIAN Yong mei.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in safety assessme of centrifuge pumpnt[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):127.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家重点研发项目（2017YFC0805803）；国家自然科学基金项目（51674277）
