[1]何亚伯,秦伟,汪洋.基于组合赋权和灰色Euclid理论的深基坑支护方案优选[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(3):94-97.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.03.017]
HE Yabo,QIN Wei,WANG Yang.Optimization of supporting schemes for deep foundation pit based
on combined weight and grey Euclid theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(3):94-97.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.03.017]
点击复制
基于组合赋权和灰色Euclid理论的深基坑支护方案优选
HE Yabo,QIN Wei,WANG Yang.Optimization of supporting schemes for deep foundation pit based on combined weight and grey Euclid theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(3):94-97.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.03.017]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 12
- 期数:
- 2016年3期
- 页码:
- 94-97
- 栏目:
- 现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2016-03-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Optimization of supporting schemes for deep foundation pit based on combined weight and grey Euclid theory
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2016)-03-0094-04
- 关键词:
- 基坑支护; 博弈集结模型; 组合赋权; 灰色Euclid理论; 方案优选
- Keywords:
- foundation pit supporting; game aggregation model; combined weight; grey Euclid theory; scheme optimization
- 分类号:
- X936
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 提高深基坑开挖施工安全水平，综合考虑基坑支护方案影响因素的特点，建立基于博弈论组合赋权和灰色Euclid理论的基坑支护方案优选决策模型。首先，运用层次分析法（AHP）与信息熵法分别确定主客观权重。然后利用博弈集结模型对指标体系进行组合赋权，得到综合权重。最后，运用灰色Euclid理论评价优选模型进行深基坑支护方案的优选，同时结合工程实例进行验证。结果表明：运用博弈集结组合赋权和灰色Euclid理论模型选出方案A4为最优支护方案，结果与工程实际一致。
- Abstract:
- In order to improve the safety level in excavation construction of deep foundation pit, comprehensively considering the characteristics of influence factors for supporting schemes of foundation pit, an optimal decision model on supporting schemes of foundation pit was established based on the game theory combined weight and grey Euclid theory. At first, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the information entropy method were applied to determine the subjective and objective weights. Then, the combination weighting was conducted on the index system by using the game aggregation model to obtain the comprehensive weight. Finally, the optimal evaluation model based on grey Euclid theory was used to make the optimization of supporting schemes for deep foundation pit, and a certain actual engineering case was used to verify the model. The results showed that the A4 was the optimal supporting scheme by using the game aggregation combination weighting and grey Euclid model, which was in agreement with the engineering practice.
参考文献/References:
［1］常江，张君.北京地铁义和庄站基坑支护结构及变形监测［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2009，5（3）：149-153.
CHANG Jiang, ZHANG Jun. Support structure and deformation monitoring of excavation pit in Yihezhuang station of Beijing subway［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(3): 149-153.
［2］卫建军，孙利亚.双排桩支护结构的应用研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7（7）：155-158.
WEI Jianjun, SUN Liya. Application research of double-row piles retaining structure［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(3): 155-158.
［3］王垚，冯超.地铁车站深基坑围护桩优化及其数值分析［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2013，9（2）：54-58.
WANG Yao, FENG Chao. Numerical analysis and optimization on supporting piles in deep foundation fit of metro station［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(2): 54-58.
［4］冯庆高，周传波，傅志峰，等.基坑支护方案的灰色模糊可变决策模型［J］.岩土力学，2010，31（7）：2226-2231.
FENG Qinggao, ZHOU Chuanbo, FU Zhifeng, et al. Grey fuzzy variable decision-making model of supporting schemes for foundation pit［J］. Rock and Mechanics, 2010, 31（7）: 2226-2231.
［5］高文华，张志敏，朱建群.基于模糊BP神经网络的深基坑支护方案优选［J］.中国安全科学学报，2006，16（7）：4-8.
GAO Wenhua, ZHANG Zhimin, ZHU Jianquan. Optimization of supporting plan of deep excavation based on fuzzy back propagation neural network［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2006, 16(7): 4-8.
［6］撒利伟，刘志忠，闫增峰.基于层次分析法和灰色系统的深基坑支护方案优选［J］.西安建筑科技大学学报（自然科学版），2013，45（6）: 797-802.
SA Liwei, LIU Zhizhong YAN Zengfeng. Optimal selection of deep foundation pit support program based on AHP and grey system［J］. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 2013, 45（6）：797-802.
［7］曹文贵，张永杰，赵明华.基坑支护方案确定的区间关联模糊优化方法研究［J］.岩土工程学报，2008，30（1）：66-71.
CAO Wengui, ZHANG Yongjie, ZHAO Minghua. Study on interval relative fuzzy optimization method to determine support schemes for foundation pits［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(1): 66-71.
［8］章恒全，蔡强.基于网络分析法的深基坑支护方案决策［J］.河南大学学报（自然科学版），2014，44（1）：113-117.
ZHANG Hengquan, CAI Qiang. Deep foundation pit supporting scheme based on ANP［J］. Journal of Henan University (Natural Science), 2014, 44(1): 113-117.
［9］周罕，曹平.软土地区城市深基坑支护方案优选的模糊层次分析法［J］.中南大学学报（自然科学版），2012，43（9）：3582-3588.
ZHOU Han, CAO Ping. A fuzzy AHP approach to select supporting schemes for city foundation pit in soft soil［J］. Journal of Central University(Science and Technology),2012,43（9）：3582-3588.
［10］魏新江，余银，张世明.基于模糊灰色关联投影法的深基坑支护方案优选［J］.岩土力学，2011，32（1）: 438-444.
WEI Xinjiang, YU Yin, ZHANG Shimin. Optimization of supporting schemes for deep foundation pit based on fuzzy grey relation projection method［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 438-444.
［11］梅年峰，罗学东，蒋楠，等.基坑支护方案灰色多目标决策优选模型的建立与应用［J］.中南大学学报（自然科学版），2013，44(5)：1982-1987.
MEI Nianfeng, LUO Xuedong, JIANG Nan, et al. Establishment and application of grey multi-objective decision-making optimization model for foundation pit supporting schemes［J］. Journal of Central University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(5): 1982-1987.
［12］郑绍羽，李素芹.混合型指标基坑支护方案优选的改进TOPSIS法［J］.中国安全科学学报，2014，24（5）: 98-103.
ZHENG Shaoyu, LI Suqin. Improved TOPSIS decision method for optimizing mixed indexes supporting schemes for Foundation pit［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24 (5): 98-103.
［13］黄国忠，吴忠广，杨灿生，等.基于灰色欧几里德理论的建筑施工安全评价模型［J］.北京科技大学学报，2011，33（4）：515-520.
HUANG Guozhong, WU Zhongguang, YANG Cansheng, et al. Safety evaluation model of construction based on grey Euclid relation theory［J］. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2011, 33(4): 515-520.
相似文献/References:
[1]卫建军,孙利亚.双排桩支护结构的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):155.
WEI Jian-jun,SUN Li-ya.The applied research of double-row piles retaining structure[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(3):155.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家自然科学基金项目（71373190）
