[1]张彬,金珠,崔铁军.基于快速图解评价法的地铁隧道施工方式选择[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(9):140-145.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.024]
ZHANG Bin,JIN Zhu,CUI Tie-jun.Selection of construction method for metro tunnel based on rapid graphical assessment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(9):140-145.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.024]
点击复制
基于快速图解评价法的地铁隧道施工方式选择
ZHANG Bin,JIN Zhu,CUI Tie-jun.Selection of construction method for metro tunnel based on rapid graphical assessment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(9):140-145.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.024]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 10
- 期数:
- 2014年9期
- 页码:
- 140-145
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2014-09-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Selection of construction method for metro tunnel based on rapid graphical assessment
- Keywords:
- rapid assessment; field evaluation; graphical method; metro tunnel; construction scheme selection
- 分类号:
- X913.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了解决目前评价方法复杂、不便在现场使用的现状，提出了一种以图形表示为主的快速评价法，该评价法主要分为两个步骤执行。第一步为根据评价指标体系确定指标的权重，并进行排序，以选择第二步绘图时绘制的指标。它是评价的准备阶段，是根据专家的意见或计算在场外确定的。第二步在指标权重排序中选择前若干指标并在现场确定他们的惩罚值，针对几个备选方案进行绘图，并根据图解准则分析。最终得到最具影响性的几个指标和惩罚值最小的最优方案。这里权重的确定使用模糊AHP法。使用矿山法、新奥法、掘进机法和盾构法作为备选方案，通过快速图解法在现场确定具体的施工方式，结果表明：对于举例隧道工程而言，盾构法的各指标惩罚值最小，对于这个隧道工程是较适合的施工方式。新奥法和掘进机法对于这个工程的适应性差不多，矿山法是最不适合的。
- Abstract:
- In order to solve the present situation that the current assessment method is complex and inconvenience to use, a rapid graphical assessment method was given with graphical representation. The assessment method was mainly divided into two steps. In the first step, the index weights were determined based on assessment index system and sorted, to select the index of plotting drawing in the second step. As the preparation stage of the assessment, it was determined according to the opinions of the experts or calculation out of construction site. In the second step, the indexes in front of the index weight sorted were selected, and their punishment value were determine in the construction site, with that and several alternatives scheme, a rapid assessment figure was drawn, and graphic analysis was conducted according to the graphic guidelines. Finally the most influential several indexes and minimum punishment value of the optimal solution were obtained. The weighs were determined using fuzzy AHP method. Using mining method, new Austrian method, boring machine and shield method as an alternative of construction schemes, the specific way of construction was determined through rapid graphical method in the field. The results showed that for the example of tunnel engineering, the punishment value of shield method is the minimum value, which is suitable for the construction of this tunnel engineering. New Austrian method and machine method had similar adaptability for this construction, and mining method was not appropriate.
参考文献/References:
[1]Gupta J P,Edwards D W. A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2003,104(1/3):15-30
[2］Gupta,J P,Edwards, et al. 2002.Inherently safer design:present and future［J］. Process Safety and Environment Protection,80(B3):115-125
[3］Hassim M H,Hurme M. Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2010,23(1):127-138
[4］于明,吴琳. PROMAX系统用于三维地震数据的快速评价［J］. 石油地球物理勘探,2008,43(S1):19-23, 195, 5-6
YU Ming,WU Lin. Using PROMAX system to rapidly evaluate 3-D seismic data［J］. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2008,43(S1):19-23, 195, 5-6
[5］唱彤. 刘之平,陈文学.滦河流域河流岸边带健康状况快速评价［J］. 水利水电技术,2013,44(2):35-39
[6］Hassim M H,Hurme M,Edwards D W, et al.Process safety and environmental protection91［Z］,2013:438-451
[7］崔铁军,马云东. 基于泛函网络的周期来压预测方法研究［J］. 计算机科学,2013,40(S1):243-246
CUI Tie-jun,MA Yun-dong. Prediction of periodic weighting based on optimized functional networks［J］. Computer Science,2013,40(S1):243-246
[8］崔铁军,马云东. 基于差异进化支持向量机的坑外土体沉降预测［J］. 中国安全科学学报,2013,23(1):83-89
CUI Tie-jun,MA Yun-dong. Prediction of Soil settlement outside pit based on DE and SVM［J］. China Safety Science Journal,2013,23(1):83-89
[9］崔铁军,马云东. 基于FLAC3D的盾构隧道施工过程建模影响因素分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(10):15-20
CUI Tie-jun,MA Yun-dong. Analysis on influence factors of modeling for construction process of shield tunnel based on FLAC3D［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2013,9(10):15-20
[10］崔铁军,马云东. 基于土压平衡盾构施工的双层地铁隧道引起地面沉降分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(12):78-84
CUI Tie-jun,MA Yun-dong. Study on surface settlement predictions for double-layer metro tunnels excavated by EPB-TBM［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2013,9(12):78-84
[11］FENG Wang,CUI Tie-jun. The comprehensive safety evaluation method on the safety situation of Iron mine based on AHP and extension theory［J］. Advanced Materials Research Vols,2013:208-212
[12］董绍斌,冯玉强,王雁军. 应用直觉模糊集多属性决策Topsis方法评价电站机组的运行状态［J］. 动力工程,2009,29(4):375-378, 383
DONG Shao-bin,FENG Yu-jiang,WANG Yan-jun. Evaluation on operating state of power plant unit by intuitionistic fuzzy Sets multiattribute decision making with topsis method［J］. Chinese Journal of Power Engineering,2009,29(4):375-378, 383
[13］Golestanifar M,Goshtasbi K,Jafarian M, et al. A multi-dimensional approach to the assessment of tunnel excavation methods［J］. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2011,48(7):1077-1085
[14］Maidl B,Schmid L,Ritz W, et al.Hardrock tunnel boring machines［Z］,2008
[15］Singh B,Goel R K.Tunnelling in weak rocks［Z］,2000
[16］Tunelling K D.Tunnel mechanics:a rational approach to tunnelling［Z］,2005
[17］胡丽芳,关欣,邓勇,等. 一种三角模糊数型多属性决策方法［J］. 控制与决策,2011,26(12):1877-1880, 1885
HU Li-fang,GUAN Xin,DENG Yong, et al. Approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making［J］. Control and Decision,2011,26(12):1877-1880, 1885
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家安监总局项目（0505079）； 辽宁省教育厅项目（1.2011048）
