|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]钟虹,何沙.基于贝叶斯网络的连续管作业人因失误风险因素评价分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(5):144-150.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.05.020]
　ZHONG Hong,HE Sha.Evaluation and analysis on risk factors of human error in coiled tubing operation based on Bayesian network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(5):144-150.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.05.020]
点击复制

基于贝叶斯网络的连续管作业人因失误风险因素评价分析*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
19
期数:
2023年5期
页码:
144-150
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2023-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation and analysis on risk factors of human error in coiled tubing operation based on Bayesian network
文章编号:
1673-193X(2023)-05-0144-07
作者:
钟虹; 何沙
（1.长江大学 经济与管理学院，湖北 荆州 434000；
2.西南石油大学 经济管理学院，四川 成都 610500）
Author(s):
ZHONG Hong;  HE Sha
(1.Economics and Management School,Yangtze University,Jingzhou Hubei 434000,China;
2.School of Economics and Management,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China)
关键词:
连续管作业; 人因失误; 贝叶斯网络; 模糊综合评价; 风险评价
Keywords:
coiled tubing operation;  human error;  Bayesian network;  fuzzy comprehensive evaluation;  risk assessment
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.05.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为准确评估连续管作业人因失误风险因素，针对人因失误风险评价缺乏因素耦合性、事故成因及损失模糊性的特点，运用贝叶斯网络方法对事故的条件概率进行计算，并结合模糊综合评价法对连续管作业人因失误风险因素进行等级评价，通过损失后果与事故发生概率相结合来解释事故成因。研究结果表明：该方法具备处理不确定因素的演绎推理和处理不确定风险的能力，增加评价结果的精确程度和风险预测的客观性；通过模型计算与推理，导致不同类型事故发生的重要风险因素影响程度不一样，技能失误和决策失误是事故影响较大的风险因素。研究结果可为连续管作业规避风险提供理论和方法支撑。
Abstract:
In order to accurately evaluate the risk factors of human error in the coiled tubing operation,aiming at the characteristics of lack of factors coupling,accident causes and loss fuzziness in the risk assessment of human error,the Bayesian network method was used to calculate the conditional probability of accidents,and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was combined to grade the risk factors of human error in the coiled tubing operation.The causes of accidents were explained through the combination of loss consequence and accident probability.The results showed that this method possessed the ability to handle deductive reasoning of uncertain factors and manage uncertain risks,thereby enhancing the precision of evaluation results and the objectivity of risk prediction.According to the model calculation and reasoning,the influence degree of the important risk factors leading to the occurrence of different types of accidents was different,and the skill error and decision-making error were the risk factors with larger accident influence.The research results can provide theoretical and methodological support for coiled tubing operation to avoid risk.

参考文献/References:

［1］钟虹,何沙,胡尧,等.人因视角下连续管作业失误影响因素辨识［J］.安全与环境学报,2022,22(5):2631-2639. ZHONG Hong,HE Sha,HU Yao,et al.Identification of influencing factors of error in coiled tubing service fromthe perspective of human factors［J］.Journal of Safety and Environment,2022,22(5):2631-2639.
［2］武晓光,黄中伟,李根生,等.“连续管+柔性钻具”超短半径水平井钻井技术研究与现场试验［J］.石油钻探技术,2022,50(6):56-63. WU Xiaoguang,HUANG Zhongwei,LI Gensheng,et al.Research and field test of ultra-short radius horizontal drilling technology combining coiled tubing and flexible BHA［J］.Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2022,50(6):56-63.
［3］ZHANG L G,YUE Q B,LUO M.The prediction of the low cycle fatigue life about the coiled tubing with ovality and wall thickness［J］.Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention,2017,17(6):1288-1296.
［4］BURGOS R,ALLCORM M,MALLALIEU R,et al.Eliminating human error during coiled tubing operations［J］.SPE Production & Operations，2007,22(3):335-338.
［5］WILLEM P V A，ADNAN S.Innovative solution to prevent coiled tubing operational failures caused by human errors［R］.SPE 68427-MS,2001.
［6］AITKEN B,MICHELI R,RAMSEY T,et al.Reducing the impact of experience gap and increasing service delivery by automating the coiled tubing intervention［R］.SPE 188685-MS,2017.
［7］KUMAR P,GUPTA S,AGARWAL M,et al.Categorization and standardization of accidental risk-criticality levels of human error to develop risk and safety management policy［J］.Safety Science,2016,85:88-98.
［8］VIRDI P S,PAMNANI G.Human error identification and risk prioritization in LPG unloading operations［J］.International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics,2023,29(1):392-406.
［9］LI P C,CHEN G H,DAI L C,et al.Fuzzy logic-based approach for identifying the risk importance of human error［J］.Safety Science,2010,48(7):902-913.
［10］ZHANG M,ZHANG D,YAO H,et al.A probabilistic model of human error assessment for autonomous cargo ships focusing on human-autonomy collaboration［J］.Safety Science,2020,130:104838.
［11］LI Y,ZHU L.Risk analysis of human error in interaction design by using a hybrid approach based on FMEA,SHERPA,and fuzzy TOPSIS［J］.Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2020,36(5):1657-1677.
［12］郝祖龙,袁睿,郝琦,等.网络攻击下安全级仪控系统人因失误风险分析初探［J］.核科学与工程,2022,42(4):959-967. HAO Zulong,YUAN Rui,HAO Qi,et al.Preliminary risk analysis of human errors for safety digital I&C system induced by cyber attacks in nuclear power plants［J］.Nuclear Science and Engineering,2022,42(4):959-967.
［13］周颖,刘正江,王新建,等.自主船舶避碰过程中人为失误的分析与评估［J］.大连海事大学学报,2022,48(3):12-19. ZHOU Ying,LIU Zhengjiang,WANG Xinjian,et al.Analysis and evaluation of human errors in collision avoidance process of maritime autonomous surface ships［J］.Journal of Dalian Maritime University,2022,48(3):12-19.
［14］郑霞忠,王晓宇,陈述,等.高处坠落事故的人因失误与干预策略研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(6):139-144. ZHENG Xiazhong,WANG Xiaoyu,CHEN Shu,et al.Study on human error and intervention strategies of high falling accidents［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(6):139-144.
［15］杨柏丞,赵志垒,陈海力.基于模糊规则库Fine-Kinney方法的沿海水域碰撞事故人为失误风险分析［J］.大连海事大学学报,2019,45(1):40-46. YANG Baicheng,ZHAO Zhilei,CHEN Haili.Human error risk analysis of coastal water collision accidents based on Fine-Kinney method of fuzzy rule base［J］.Journal of Dalian Maritime University,2019,45(1):40-46.
［16］PEARL J.Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems:networks of plausible inference［M］.San Francisco,California:Morgan kaufmann,1988.
［17］KORB K B,NICHOLSON A E.Bayesian artificial intelligence［M］.Boca Raton,New York:CRC press,2010.
［18］李洪兴，汪群，段钦治，等.工程模糊数学方法及应用［M］.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1993.
［19］张驰,陈涛,倪顺江.基于层次分析和模糊综合评价的电网系统应急能力评估［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(2):180-186. ZHANG Chi，CHEN Tao，NI Shunjiang.Evaluation on emergency capability of power grid system based on AHP and FCE［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2020,16(2):180-186.
［20］NADKARNI S,SHENOY P P.A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks［J］.Decision Support Systems,2004,38(2):259-281.
［21］李艳颖.贝叶斯网络学习及数据分类［M］.北京:科学出版社,2018.
［22］中国石油天然气集团有限公司质量安全环保部.油田企业生产安全风险防控指南［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,2018.
［23］河南省安全生产标准化技术委员会.石油天然气开采企业安全生产风险隐患双重预防体系建设实施指南:DB41/T 2249—2022［S］.郑州:河南省市场监督管理局,2022.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡晓,陈胜,石岿然,等.电梯检验过程中的人因失误分析与管理对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.031]
　HU Xiao,CHEN Sheng,SHI Kui ran,et al.Research on human error failure analysis and management countermeasures in the process of elevator inspection[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(5):160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.031]
[2]吴海涛,罗霞.基于直觉三角模糊TOPSIS的高铁列车调度指挥人因失误风险排序[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(4):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.024]
　WU Hai tao,LUO Xia.Risk prioritization model of human error for highspeed railwaydispatchers based on intuitionistic triangular fuzzy TOPSIS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(5):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.04.024]
[3]王永刚,吴潘根.民航人因失误分类框架[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(6):171.
　WANG Yong gang,WU Pan Gen.A framework of classifying human error for civil aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(5):171.
[4]兰建义,乔美英,周英.基于灰色系统理论的煤矿人因事故关键因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(2):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.029]
　LAN Jian-yi,QIAO Mei-ying,ZHOU Ying.Analysis on critical factor of human error accidents in coal mine based on gray system theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(5):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.029]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2023-02-02
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目（51974036）
作者简介： 钟虹，博士，讲师，主要研究方向为行为安全与安全文化、设备健康管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-12