|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张羽,任昱侨,岑康.新冠疫情背景下建筑从业人员统计生命价值研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(2):41-46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.02.006]
　ZHANG Yu,REN Yuqiao,CEN Kang.Research on VOSL of construction practitioners in context of COVID-19[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(2):41-46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.02.006]
点击复制

新冠疫情背景下建筑从业人员统计生命价值研究*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
19
期数:
2023年2期
页码:
41-46
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2023-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on VOSL of construction practitioners in context of COVID-19
文章编号:
1673-193X(2023)-02-0041-06
作者:
张羽; 任昱侨; 岑康
（西南石油大学 土木工程与测绘学院，四川 成都 610500）
Author(s):
ZHANG Yu;  REN Yuqiao;  CEN Kang
(School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China)
关键词:
新冠疫情; 建筑业; 统计生命价值（VOSL）; 条件价值法（CVM）; 生存分析
Keywords:
COVID-19;  construction industry;  value of a statistical life (VOSL);  contingent valuation method (CVM);  survival analysis
分类号:
X915.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.02.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究建筑职业风险和新冠疫情风险下的统计生命价值（VOSL），以成都市建筑从业者为对象采集数据，基于生存分析处理删失数据的特性，运用二分式条件价值法（CVM）和Kaplan-Meier法测算不同背景下的VOSL，运用COX回归对VOSL影响因素进行分析。研究结果表明：成都市建筑从业者在职业风险和新冠疫情风险下的VOSL分别为429.472，459.079万元，生命价值评估具有情境依赖性且存在“引导悖论”；2种风险背景下受访者学历、月收入及安全重视程度的提高均会增强支付意愿，而安全满意程度的提高则会降低支付意愿；职业风险下影响支付意愿的关键因素为安全设备保障满意程度、重视程度和学历，新冠疫情风险下影响支付意愿的关键因素为卫生安全重视程度、学历和月收入。
Abstract:
In order to study the value of a statistics life (VOSL) under the construction occupational risk and the COVID-19 risk,the data were collected from the construction practitioners in Chengdu,and based on the characteristics of survival analysis in processing the censored data,the VOSL under different backgrounds were calculated by the dichotomous contingent valuation method (CVM) and Kaplan-Meier method,then the influential factors of VOSL were analyzed with COX regression.The results showed that the VOSL of construction practitioners in Chengdu under the occupational risk and the COVID-19 risk was 4,294,720 yuan and 4,590,790 yuan respectively.The evaluation of life value had the scenarios dependence and “bootstrap paradox”.Under two risk backgrounds,all the educational level,monthly income and emphasis on safety of the respondents would enhance the willingness to pay (WTP),while the increase of safety satisfaction would reduce WTP.Under the influence of occupational risk,the key factors affecting WTP were the satisfaction and emphasis on guarantee of equipment and the educational level.Under the COVID-19 risk,the key factors affecting WTP were the emphasis on health and safety,educational level and monthly income.

参考文献/References:

［1］魏振宽,周延峰,荆全忠.基于生命经济价值理论的生产安全分析［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2006，2(4):8-11. WEI Zhenkuan，ZHOU Yanfeng，JING Quanzhong.Safety analysis of production based on economic value of life［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2006，2(4):8-11.
［2］SCHELLING T C.The life you save may be your own［C］// Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis,American，1968.
［3］梅强,杨宗康,刘素霞,等.条件价值法评估生命价值的应用探讨［J］.中国安全科学学报,2009,19(12):28-33，204. MEI Qiang,YANG Zongkang,LIU Suxia,et al.Application study on the evaluation of VSL based on contingent valuation method［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2009,19(12):28-33，204.
［4］CARSON R T.Valuation of tropical rainforests:philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation［J］.Ecological Economics,1998,24(1):15-29.
［5］张志强,徐中民,程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用［J］.地球科学进展,2003(3):454-463. ZHANG Zhiqiang,XU Zhongmin,CHENG Guodong.The updated development and application of contingent valuation method［J］.Advances in Earth Science,2003(3):454-463.
［6］ARROW K,SOLOW R,PORTNEY P R,et al.NOAA panel on contingent valuation［J］.Federal Registe,1993,58:4602-4614.
［7］刘文歌,赵胜川.两分式条件价值法评估道路交通统计生命价值［J］.交通运输系统工程与信息,2014,14(1):65-70，241. LIU Wenge,ZHAO Shengchuan.The VOSL in road traffic based on CVM with dichotomous choice formats［J］.Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2014,14(1):65-70，241.
［8］VASSANADUMRONGDEE S,MATSUOKA S.Risk perceptions and value of a statistical life for air pollution and traffic accidents:evidence from bangkok,thailand［J］.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,2005,30(3):261-287.
［9］LIAO C H,LIU J T,PWU R F,et al.Valuation of the economic benefits of human papillomavirus vaccine in Taiwan［J］.Value in Health,2009,12(S3):74-77.
［10］SHANMUGAM K R.Valuations of life and injury risks［J］.Environmental and Resource Economics,2000,16(4):379-389.
［11］MICHAEL H W.Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses［J］.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1984,66(3):332-341.
［12］HAAB T C,MCCONNELL K E.Referendum models and negative willingness to pay:alternative solutions［J］.Working Papers,1997,32(2):251-270.
［13］AN M Y.A Semiparametric distribution for willingness to pay and statistical inference with dichotomous choice contingent valuation Data［J］.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2000,82(3):487-500.
［14］CARSON R T，MITCHELL R C，HANEMANN M，et a1.Contingent valuation and lost passive use：damages from the exxon valdez oil spill［J］.Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,25(3):257-286.
［15］蔡细平,沈月琴.持续性分析用于条件价值评估法数据统计分析—以浙江省临安市CVM调查数据为例［J］.东北林业大学学报,2009,37(1):94-95,104. CAI Xiping,SHEN Yueqin.Application of parameter estimation to contingent valuation method based on duration analysis:a case study of data analysis for Lin’an City,Zhejiang province［J］.Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2009,37(1):94-95,104.
［16］康良国,吴超,王秉.安全信息认知对心理安全感的作用机理研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(7):5-10. KANG Liangguo,WU Chao,WANG Bing.Research on action mechanism of safety information cognition on psychological safety sense［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2020,16(7):5-10.
［17］NUNNALLY J C.Psychometric theory［M］.New York：McGrawHill,1978.
［18］李静萍,谢邦昌.多元统计分析方法与应用［M］.北京：中国人民大学出版社,2008.
［19］COX D R.Regression models and life-tables［J］.Journal of the Royal Statal Society,1972,34(2):187-202.

相似文献/References:

[1]谢振华,陈茜,范冰冰,等.基于事故致因理论的建筑业事故隐患的界定和排查[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(9):113.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.019]
　XIE Zhen-hua,CHEN Xi,FAN Bing-bing,et al.Definition and inspection of accident potential in buildingconstruction based on accident-causing theories[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(2):113.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.019]
[2]叶贵,陈梦莉,汪红霞.建筑安全事故人为因素分类研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(4):131.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.024]
　YE Gui,CHEN Mengli,WANG Hongxia.Study on classification of human factors in construction safety accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(2):131.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.024]
[3]仝立杨,郑霞忠,陈国梁.建筑业省域安全生产目标设置和政策优化路径研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(8):155.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.025]
　TONG Liyang,ZHENG Xiazhong,CHEN Guoliang.Research on provincial work safety target setting and policy optimization route for construction industry[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(2):155.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.08.025]
[4]史玉芳,董芮.组织支持感对建筑业农民工不安全行为的影响*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(10):158.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.10.025]
　SHI Yufang,DONG Rui.Impact of perceived organizational support on unsafe behavior of migrant workers in construction industry[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(2):158.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.10.025]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2021-10-20
* 基金项目： 教育部人文社科青年基金项目( 14XJCZH004)；四川省社科规划项目(SC21B162)
作者简介： 张羽，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为安全知识与行为、安全监管博弈。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-07